Maat1985 wrote: » If the company could be seen as or fojnd to be harbouring cyberbullying then it could very easily be held somewhat accountable. It would be very easy to show that by releasing a players name they have opened up that player to cyberbullying. By not releasing the players name it would be easy for the company to defend that they did the best they could to maintain the playing experiance and integrity of its game for its users whilst also protecting the offender. The law for things like this is often bs amd keeps evolving and often means that noone has to take responsibility for its actions these days as there is always some bigger fish to blame. Agree or disagree thats your choice i dont think here is the place to continue this discussion on the legal side. But i agree with them bot releasing the name in an attempt to pretect the players privacy but also believe the player should be auto kicked from the alliance they are in
SuperFarz wrote: » Maat1985 wrote: » If the company could be seen as or fojnd to be harbouring cyberbullying then it could very easily be held somewhat accountable. It would be very easy to show that by releasing a players name they have opened up that player to cyberbullying. By not releasing the players name it would be easy for the company to defend that they did the best they could to maintain the playing experiance and integrity of its game for its users whilst also protecting the offender. The law for things like this is often bs amd keeps evolving and often means that noone has to take responsibility for its actions these days as there is always some bigger fish to blame. Agree or disagree thats your choice i dont think here is the place to continue this discussion on the legal side. But i agree with them bot releasing the name in an attempt to pretect the players privacy but also believe the player should be auto kicked from the alliance they are in What if an alliance gets the message that a player is cheating and they guess a random guy that they kick. The cheater in the alliance after that stops cheating and now the random guy is getting stalked because since he left the alliance is cheat free? We can make up more stories on both sides. However a Game that is heavy focused on Alliances and teamplay where now a group is being lpenalized and can’t take any action when an unknown player is refusing to play faire is terrible service.
InfinityWarrior123 wrote: » Saw one alliance dropped from master to plat 1 with 500 points reduction. These alliances will meet easier opponent based on their new war rating. They are somehow punished but also having advantage for the remaining wars? Does these alliances still deserve a plat 1 rewards after caught on cheating? Yes, they dont get master rewards. but do they even deserve to be in plat 1? Alliances who caught for cheating at the end of the season should be penalised more than those who get caught at the beginning of the season as they have gained points through cheating from more wars.
Maat1985 wrote: » @DNA3000 this was never in court but an out of court settlement in which nintendeo was offering gloves to all owners of mario party as a result of complaints that people were suffering injury from the way they were playing a game. So yes it is possible that a company can be found liable for this kind of thing.
Kabam Miike wrote: » Don't worry guys. We're on this. Any ratings or scores will rightly reflect actions that are taken against Alliances that did not play legitimately. I repeat: This is not the correct ranking right now.