**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
I haven't faced Iceman enough to really get a grip on countering cold snap, but magiks damage is avoidable. Some cases more than others, but it is not completely unavoidable.
This thread was posted by the OP to find answers, you have provided nothing constructive here. @GroundedWisdom has a valid point. It's an alliance event, not every fight will be a one shot ko and those fights, mainly boss and minis, require a group effort. No matter what tier your in, that statement holds weight.
As for me, I've been in tier 1 allies but find tier 2 much more enjoyable. I run 6-8 fights every war that include l1 and l2 unblockable nodes, stun immune, thorns and right mini. My team consists of vision, ww2 and sl. I've been playing for 2.5 years.
Takes some practice bit it can be done fairly regularly. I usually stand back in neutral and do a little cat/mouse to get her to proc so dex doesn't kick in
Lol it's not a pissing contest. It's just nice when people talk about things they actually experienced.
Actually it does, if your not in tier 1 or 2 then how can you give an accurate statement on what's its like. It's got nothing to do with discrediting anyone. You actually alluded to the fact you encounter this by says "we can have top tier rewards"
It would be too bad if it wasn't fuelled by 5\5 MD
This is not the first time someone has tried to discredit my view based on that fact. It's a constant issue. No one can speak for what I have and have not fought in the game. For that matter, anyone has a right to express a view, and they're all equally as valid. Some people don't like that fact, but that's how it is in a free discussion. If someone doesn't agree with what someone says, they are perfectly capable of presenting an argument and a case using their own facts, and it does not require people to put others on the spot and try to exploit their views. I'm not sensitive to it at all. I'm calling it as it is. If someone attacks where someone is at in the game, that is exactly what it is. If they debate on what someone is saying, that's entirely different.
Sorry, but you're not in the right here. It certainly DOES matter where you're "at" in the game because that informs you're opinion. Or should.
If you haven't faced a T1 Magik boss, your opinion is not as valid as someone who has. That's just common sense. It doesnt mean you can't have an opinion, it just means yours isn't as valid when the discussion moves that way.
You are welcome to comment and give advice, but make the caveat statement that you don't know what it's like at the top tires do people who are looking for that type of opinion can safely ignore yours.
I expressed my opinion. People agree, people disagree. That's fine. What's not acceptable is devaluing that opinion based on where they are. I didn't give advice. What you're saying is, someone's opinion is welcomed, but people have the right to devalue it by demanding to know what they have and have not fought. That's a contradiction. I didn't state where I was and was not in the game. That's the point. That's not the topic. The topic is about the effect of Limbo. Sorry, people don't have the right to take a dump on someone's opinion by demanding they validate it with Rank. That's not a respectable conversation.
Ok simple question. Not insulting anyone here.
Theres someone from MMXIV or CØRE talking to someone who started playing the game yesterday. They are having a conversation about act 5 and the difficulties faced. Does the person who started yesterday have a valid opinion on act 5 when he hasn't played it? Just say yes or no please.
It's called finding out a person's credentials. You know like how real life works too. Everyone can have an opinion but that doesn't mean that opinion is equal to another person's opinion.
Exactly. I mean I can't go up to Stephen hawking and say, I think black holes are made from liquorice and expect him to think "hmm I must accept the validity of this opinion because it doesn't matter how much they know"
Every opinion is valid in an open discussion. That's just how it works. You may agree or disagree. That doesn't give you the right to demand that everyone validate their opinion. My statement was general. I did not question anyone's progress or skill. I did not direct it at anyone, or ask them to validate their views. I stated my opinion.
That's not how it works in a Forum. People are not required to qualify for discussions. It's actually an ignorant point of view. Any opinion is valid, and people aren't screened based on progress. It's not how it works here. A discussion is not a job interview. People are not required to prove anything. The credential argument doesn't hold here. We have a discussion about Limbo, and an effort to discredit someone's opinion rather than a respectful debate.
You're right that people aren't required to qualify for these discussions. Anyone can join in. Even the people who don't even know what marvel contest of champions is. But like i said. You and even they can have their opinions. Nobody is and should take that away from you. It's just that they aren't equal to say someone who's actually been playing the game since launch and has done most of everything the game has to offer. Don't kid yourself lol.
The worst champ to go against in aw is dorm. Come to one of my wars (2500+ war rating) and take a shot at a R4 5* duped dormamu and see how long you last lol. Magik is nothing compared to him.
@GroundedWisdom's response was spot on. It really doesn't matter what tier you're in for this discussion. Magik is magik. Use some glory for potions and heal up after you fight a magik or iceman. Simple solution. Iceman is a piss easy fight lol.
Every opinion is equal. The question of where someone is at in the game has nothing to do with my comment. I said these Champs present a challenge, and I understand how unavoidable Damage is frustrating, but if we didn't have challenges, the game would be boring. I said the higher you go, the more Damage you can incur, and that's the reason Limbo is scaled so high. Finally, I said that the Top Tiers are supposed to be hard for some people because they are the top. None of that statement warrants questioning where I'm at in the game. What you're saying is everyone has the right to express their opinion, but it's only as valid as their position in the game. That's a contradiction. Their opinion is valid. Every opinion is equally valid in a discussion. Opinions are not the same as experience. Anyone can have an understanding on the game regardless of where they are at, and if someone is choosing to focus on the person's status rather than the validity of their points, it's a small-minded view that will inevitably lead to missing some real information. A human being does not equal their Rank. Neither does their knowledge or understanding on it. I'm going to leave the conversation because this has turned into something that the topic is not about. I've stated my opinions. If people want to question where I'm at because they don't like them, that's up to them.
Except a human being does equal rank lol. This whole game even revolves around ranks, brackets etc. AQ brackets? AW war ratings? Arena ranks? All opinions being equal is just wishful thinking lol.
Anyways that being said I don't want Magik to get nerfed
challenge is other thing and frustration is another
you havent experienced her in tier 1 fight and I have, today I fought 5star r4 magik with md5 on 200% power gain node and ended up using 2 team revives.
and there is no balance in aw defence this time every war we know there will be magik or dormammu will be on boss node its boring now things should be change.
Seriously can someone summarize all the essays in this thread?
Forgive me for jumping in thinking logically here, but if everyone's opinion is equally valid then aren't the opinions that are disagreeing with you, by your own admission, valid? That's the problem with trying to hide behind a buffer like that. You are either discredited because you affirm the validity of other's posts about you and their right to do so, or you dismiss them and become a hypocrite. I wonder which one you will choose? ****mind blown ****
To the OP, Magik is a very difficult champ. Power lock champs, champs with energy resistance (except Ultron, thanks Kabam), high regen champs, and even some power gain champs work the best against her. You can also adjust your masteries to give you a bit of an edge if she is a consistent problem. Also, in t1 AW you have to be really careful about triggering MD with dexterity. Probably the best champ against Magik funny enough, is Magik. Hope this helps.
I never said that people who disagree with me aren't valid. I said the topic had nothing to do with proving what Tier you're in. That was what was questioned. On the subject of nerfing Magik, I commented. Never said anyone didn't have the right to express their views. On the contrary. My validity was questioned when I in no way questioned the validity of others. You are adding conjecture and twisting my comments. What does it have to do with the topic? Nothing. If it were anyone else commenting, they would not be questioned as to where they are. That makes it personal. The only person whose views are challenged here are mine.
Therefore, the discussion about me will end. The topic is Limbo. I commented. Anyone else is free to offer their view. It just doesn't have to involve making the Thread about me.
If I have reason to believe someone doesn't know what they're talking about I'll call them out on it, thing is, you post so much and so often with so much "dribble" that I can see that you don't know what you're talking about all the time. I've also seen a screenshot of your account, which has rank 4s as the top champions (not saying that makes you a bad player, just that not many have done act 5 chapter 2 with 4/40) Which makes me question where you are in the game, which I'm not trying to pull rank and say you're **** because you're not where I am.
As an example, I have a better understanding of act 5 than you because I've 100% the first 5 in chapter 2 act 5 and I don't even know if you've completed act 4. But I know you havnt done act 5 because you don't post about it in the act 5 thread and if you had done it you'd be spouting about it there too.
What does this mean? I have a better understanding about act 5 because I have hands on experience with it, you don't have a good understanding of it because you havnt done it. This means that my opinion on act 5 and the difficulties faced is more valid than yours. You could say oh I don't think bane is a fair node because "a, b and c" but I could say actually I've fought it and it's ok because "X,y and z".
This doesn't mean you're **** because you havnt done it, it just means I know more than you. Its not an insult against you, I'm not making you a victim, it's simple facts and simple levels of knowledge. I'd call anyone out on it given the evidence you've given us.
That's why I place magik on stun immune nodes
When you say you beat her with Wolvie and Dr Strange, she probably wasn't on boss node right? If I understood correctly, you use only vision and magik if she is on a boss node.