official awards

Fdk_bruxoFdk_bruxo Member Posts: 1
in Suggestions and Requests
I suggest a bonus in the awards of the alliance missions and in the alliance wars, for officers and alliance owners, as these usually strive more during these events coordinated players, war defense organization. There is often no time left to play the monthly events, or complete the missions of the story.
It would be fair to bonus officers and owners, but to avoid fraud rules would need to be created, such as limiting the number of officers in an alliance, and rewarding according to the performance of the alliance in the war and during alliance missions.
Thank you very much for your attention

Comments

  • BadshadowBadshadow Member Posts: 1
    not to mention the whats groups, guidelines for other members, enlistments, set aside discussions, organization of diversity etc.
  • SiriusBreakSiriusBreak Member, Guardian Posts: 2,156 Guardian
    As a leader this sounds nice in theory, but without the members doing their part, the Alliance doesn't thrive. I wouldn't want anything more than they can get. Sure, I put in extra time with organizing, recruiting, building diversity lists, etc. My officers are a BIG help too. Just the same, I doubt something like this could ever happen. Too many would scream it's not fair. Truthfully, it kind of isn't. Even with all the added work I do, I do it so we ALL benefit. Maybe others will disagree and believe leadership deserves something extra.

    I wouldn't say deserves so much as would be appreciated. One of those situations where I'd never expect it, but wouldn't say no if it was given. Perhaps make this an annual to biannual bonus to Leadership for staying at it? Too often would be too much. An occasional 'thanks for all the hard work' bonus wouldn't be over the top. Also, would have to figure out what would be fair for such. Would it be tiered? Based around progress, Alliance size, time served, or some other parameters?

    I've heard this proposed in another thread recently. It's hard to be veiwed as being objective in the matter when being leadership of an Alliance. Some would say 'well of course you want it, you're a leader.' Again, I wouldn't be opposed, but I wouldn't expect it either. Welcomed? Of course. I guess hearing members say their piece on this would help get an idea of how it would be viewed. Would a small biannual bonus to leadership be unfair? I don't think a bonus to everything awarded is right. That's too much.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.