Should I be worried or excited?

Midnite93Midnite93 Member Posts: 4,179 ★★★★★
in General Discussion
This does makes me smile and a bit of worry but we will see coz I do remember 12.0

Comments

  • SiriusBreakSiriusBreak Member, Guardian Posts: 2,156 Guardian
    Judging by the wording, it would seem they're going to be increasing the performance of leas than stellar champs instead of nerfing the already good champs. I think Kabam learned a valuable lesson from 12.0. Why nerf the few good champs when you can buff/tweak the many less than good champs? Increasing the underperforming champs effectiveness will help balance things out by giving the already good champs a harder fight.
  • hiddenblizzardhiddenblizzard Member Posts: 506 ★★
    SiriusBreak said:

    Judging by the wording, it would seem they're going to be increasing the performance of leas than stellar champs instead of nerfing the already good champs. I think Kabam learned a valuable lesson from 12.0. Why nerf the few good champs when you can buff/tweak the many less than good champs? Increasing the underperforming champs effectiveness will help balance things out by giving the already good champs a harder fight.

    I hope you're right
  • ZuroZuro Member Posts: 2,934 ★★★★★
    I think they are making the gap between bad champs and good champs by improving some of the lower used characters starting with HT and annihilus
  • KalantakKalantak Member Posts: 1,300 ★★★★
    i really hope this goes through and all champs get balanced. desperately need that in game!!
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • KalantakKalantak Member Posts: 1,300 ★★★★
    PeterQuill said:

    Double Punisher 2099's attack!

    what if he inflicted 50,100% & 200% incinerate and shock on specials (1,2,3)

  • KihlgastKihlgast Member Posts: 111 ★
    I think it is a good thing. They only mention champions that are underperforming. Not champions been too good. So hopefully they can make the bad champs usefull
Sign In or Register to comment.