Comments

  • So we all can agree to disagree. Some think it is fair and some don't. Bottom line here is kabam should be more careful as well as the players in the game. We know Kabam's track record with releasing content or items that are not ready. If this happens again (kabam releasing a crystal as not intended), and ppl open another…
  • Wow that is gonna be ridiculous and ppl still think kabam is doing the right thing. So dumb. If ppl choose not to read, then it is their fault.
  • Well it is their business and they certainly have the right to run it however they see fit and do things as they feel is "fair". Not sure where you are grabbing this idea that the majority of players are ok with. I didn't open one of these crystals. I am not upset that about not opening or opening and not getting on this…
  • I just say let it ride and keep the sentry champ and they get nothing else. Not sure why kabam wants to step up and do something this time when they screw up in other areas and don't make it right.
  • Maybe it is with the last part, but regardless this was handled incorrectly with kabam. What would be fairer than just giving them a void 5* is just giving them the featured crystal to have a 2nd chance and keep sentry.
  • I honestly don't think kabam handled this the right way. Getting 2 champs for the price of one is absurd. Just take away the sentry they got and give them void and gift back any gold and rank up material they used on sentry. Fair trade. Guess the only problem is what if sentry was pulled as the subfeatured and not as the…