What kabam is going to do with the issue that some people receive 2 5* wakening gems

Thanks for the christmas gift but as have a problem some people receive 2 5* wakening gema. And that gives them a unfair advantge on the people that receive One.

Comments

  • CapWW2CapWW2 Member Posts: 2,901 ★★★★
    No one did
  • Timone147Timone147 Member Posts: 1,276 ★★★★
    Most likely nothing. Very low probability they give everyone who didn’t get 2 another one.

    I’m just happy with the one I received honestly.
  • Shaun01Shaun01 Member Posts: 250 ★★
    I've seen absolutely nothing about people receiving Two AG crystals.
  • Edfranco7Edfranco7 Member Posts: 7
    I have a friend that got 2
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,103 ★★★★★
    CapWW2 wrote: »
    No one did

    that's not true, some people did get 2
  • VulcanMVulcanM Member Posts: 664 ★★
    i wouldnt mind another one lmao
  • DoctorJDoctorJ Member Posts: 842 ★★★
    If it did happen, id assume kabam will do their usual move. Nothing.
  • The_OneThe_One Member Posts: 2,936 ★★★★
    CapWW2 wrote: »
    No one did

    Actually they did.
    I know of people in my alliance that got 2 and no, they didn't already have one.
    They got one from the in game message and 1 in the stash
  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Member Posts: 14,018 ★★★★★
    It's a bug that allows you to duplicate itemd received in a message (somehow doesn't work with gifts sent by other players).

    People got the chance to duplicate the awakening gem crystal, that really happened
  • Kabam ZibiitKabam Zibiit Administrator Posts: 7,033
    Hey there, there is already a thread going for this topic here, where we have also let players know that we are currently looking into this. As updates become available, we will post them there.
  • PlagueisBanePlagueisBane Member Posts: 232
    think everyone got 1 for free from kabam through the in game mail. I pulled two more 5* AG's from the GG crystals.
    did your friend get 2 for free or maybe he pulled 1 from GG crystals and 1 for free.
This discussion has been closed.