Unfair AW Rewards

Jazza68Jazza68 Member Posts: 1
in General Discussion
Many times we lost in AW due to the enemy team didn't fill up their defence phase e.g. only 17 or 19 players. So we can fully capture 100% of their bases due to this. However, during attack phase enemy gather their full squad of 20 and cap 100% on us whereas we can max to 95%. KABAM did not torture those allies that cant participate in full swing or being inactive but torture those Alliances that are fully active in AW. This is absurd. KABAM should penalized them for their shortage in defence and disallow others to join in attack phase. We demand a better outlook in the warring system and oversee such matters.

Comments

  • Repto23Repto23 Member Posts: 787 ★★★
    How about using diversity to beat them since they aren't placing all members
  • ScorpiodsuScorpiodsu Member Posts: 21 ★
    This is definitely not true. If you cover the entire map you get 100% whether or not they place defenders.
  • Crumb3307Crumb3307 Member Posts: 346 ★★
    You get full attack bonus for any defenders not placed, know what you’re talking about before blasting the system.
  • Forgotten2Forgotten2 Member Posts: 179 ★★
    Blame your own alliance skill if you are losing to a group who doesn't place all defenders
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,640 Guardian
    Crumb3307 said:

    You get full attack bonus for any defenders not placed, know what you’re talking about before blasting the system.

    Just a tiny correction: as Kabam Miike stated, you get full attack bonus for any node you enter, whether you defeat the defender placed there or just walk into the node because there's nothing placed there.

    In the past some players complained they did not get full attack bonus for "empty paths" without realizing that even though they are empty, they still have to traverse them with an attacker to actually get the points. Not just the exploration points but the attack bonus points as well.
  • ScorpiodsuScorpiodsu Member Posts: 21 ★
    You have to still cover the node to get full bonus even if it’s empty. Don’t skip a path because they didn’t place.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Member Posts: 8,672 ★★★★★
    GluteusMaximus said:

    Jazza68 said:

    KABAM should penalized them for their shortage in defence and disallow others to join in attack phase. We demand a better outlook in the warring system and oversee such matters.

    that's an interesting idea. i know half the guys in my alli get irked when some don't place defenders but still get rewards by joining after the map has cleared.
    If one of our players couldn't place defense because their phone broke or something, I'd still want them to be able to attack. If you've got guys not joining war until the map is cleared as a strategy you should kick them. Kabam doesn't need to make a rule for this.
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 12,686 Guardian
    Seems like a whole lot of relatively new people to game and forums doing a whole lot of complaining about higher level stuff without yet knowing how scoring system works, etc.

    They can jump up to level 40-50 fairly quickly, without the growing pains of finding out how the game actually works, and end up becoming higher alliances (relative to their experience).

    Not just this thread, but seems like it’s a whole lot of this going on in Forums the past few months.

    And not just asking a question about how scoring works, etc (which would be understandable). But demanding action by Kabam for some wrongly-assumed presumption of what is going on.
Sign In or Register to comment.