KABAM DIDN΄T REMOVE THE ADDITIONAL 6* NAMOR DUPES?????

2»

Comments

  • This content has been removed.
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 12,822 Guardian
    But the REASON of OP's complaint versus Coat's observation is totally opposite each other.

    So assuming for here that the actual count on Namor being returned should have only been x2 (if he only ever pulled him twice), or for sake of accounting for getting an extra Dup back that people got and then taken away later should have been x3 initially and then a minus x1 later on....
    And assuming that (admittedly not knowing exactly how many Sig Stones and of what type had been used between Namor and Cull before selling), that it seems clear from the video that he was probably SHORTED an amount of Sig Stones roughly equivalent to the “Extra” Dup count on Namor himself (whether your accounting for minus 1 Dup adjustment later or not)

    OP says it was in Seatin's Advantage to get the combination of DUP’S and Stones back the way he did.
    Versus Coat, saying it was a Disadvantage for Seatin’s to get them back like that (which is probably correct, Seatin probably would have liked the higher/correct SIG STONES, and only x2 on Namor).

    Point being, why does OP think it was more beneficial to Seatin to be forced into having the Levels in Namor instead of having the extra Stones to use in whomever he liked instead ??
  • edited April 2020
    This content has been removed.
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★

    But the REASON of OP's complaint versus Coat's observation is totally opposite each other.

    So assuming for here that the actual count on Namor being returned should have only been x2 (if he only ever pulled him twice), or for sake of accounting for getting an extra Dup back that people got and then taken away later should have been x3 initially and then a minus x1 later on....
    And assuming that (admittedly not knowing exactly how many Sig Stones and of what type had been used between Namor and Cull before selling), that it seems clear from the video that he was probably SHORTED an amount of Sig Stones roughly equivalent to the “Extra” Dup count on Namor himself (whether your accounting for minus 1 Dup adjustment later or not)

    OP says it was in Seatin's Advantage to get the combination of DUP’S and Stones back the way he did.
    Versus Coat, saying it was a Disadvantage for Seatin’s to get them back like that (which is probably correct, Seatin probably would have liked the higher/correct SIG STONES, and only x2 on Namor).

    Point being, why does OP think it was more beneficial to Seatin to be forced into having the Levels in Namor instead of having the extra Stones to use in whomever he liked instead ??

    I’m not saying it was/wasn’t a disadvantage, if you look at his account he has over 260 sig stones between Surfer and Sunspot with 28 generics still in overflow. The game has provided ~180 generics, i’m not going to go all investigative on this by evidencing his account tours and referencing his previous pulls and what’s been available via offers because Kabam themselves can see a discrepancy if they choose to look. But if you look over his recent account tour he appears to be significantly up 6* sig stones from what you can naturally acquire...
  • edited April 2020
    This content has been removed.
  • SentryPillowSentryPillow Member Posts: 307 ★★★
    @SummonerNR @lowlevelplayer the whole point is about the integrity of the matter. Who gets the extra 100 sig stones whether it be Seatin or some random person doesn’t excuse the fact that it’s extremely unfair. 100 6* sig stones is worth a ton in the current state of the game and provides an unfair advantage to whomever gets them for free.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,575 ★★★★★
    The problem is, it wasn't just Seatin by evidence of the Post shared. Which means if they say the process is completed and people need to contact Support, then that leaves it up to whoever is honest enough to do that. Am I implying he isn't? No. I am saying that most people wouldn't do that. Lol.
  • SentryPillowSentryPillow Member Posts: 307 ★★★
    @GroundedWisdom probably best to check the facts first lol. Support is super useless so I doubt that they’ll do anything
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,575 ★★★★★
    I'm having a conversation based on the information provided here, and I don't have much energy for the snowball effect of one person trying to call me out and others chiming in. I literally just pointed out that it's probably not going to be done if it's up to people to do it themselves. I'm agreeing that it's a problem, and still people are coming back with the whole facts argument. However, it's not my decision to make and if they said it's up to people to have them removed themselves, then that must mean they're okay with that, so getting reactive with me isn't going to change the outcome. I'm not the one that made that decision.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,575 ★★★★★

    Who cares lol

    Well, to be fair, I can understand why people are upset. In the interest of fairness alone, it's a trigger. It also affects Prestige, but only acutely for those close to them. In any case, it is what it is I guess.
  • ReferenceReference Member Posts: 2,910 ★★★★★

    @SummonerNR @lowlevelplayer the whole point is about the integrity of the matter. Who gets the extra 100 sig stones whether it be Seatin or some random person doesn’t excuse the fact that it’s extremely unfair. 100 6* sig stones is worth a ton in the current state of the game and provides an unfair advantage to whomever gets them for free.

    Good point
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,575 ★★★★★
    Honestly, the matter is over now anyway. If their response is that the work has been done on their end, I don't see them going back again, so like I said, it is what it is. As for the comments that I don't know what's going on, I wasn't aware there were people that kept them. This Forum is for sharing information, and it's a great deal more productive to point it out than go on the offensive. No one knows everything.
  • GamerGamer Member Posts: 10,898 ★★★★★
    It really doesn’t matter to most asides from top 20 so why bother abudt I’m get it it’s right but It what it is
  • New_Noob168New_Noob168 Member Posts: 1,585 ★★★★
    And how do you know if he didn't get another 6* namor recently... Stop making trouble.
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★

    And how do you know if he didn't get another 6* namor recently... Stop making trouble.

    He uploads his openings? Has only been opening 6* featured? Go ahead and show us him pullIng Namor, he documents it all. Stop making trouble.
  • This content has been removed.
  • SceptilemaniacSceptilemaniac Member Posts: 1,247 ★★★★
    Agree with the OP. Kabam owes us an explanation or I guess @Seatin can clarify what happened?
  • GamerGamer Member Posts: 10,898 ★★★★★

    The point is that he is probably not the only one who still has more 6* dupes
    , than he should have

    Gamer said:

    It really doesn’t matter to most asides from top 20 so why bother abudt I’m get it it’s right but It what it is

    I’m Agerd and that’s one don’t get me wrong but I’m for let’s said u got it then rank3 him ect then get take away the dups is so mut woser but then again own failures to rank a champions op u was aware of wasn’t right I’m get the point but you ikow he wil get him max sig sooner or later it just matter of time
  • This content has been removed.
  • GamerGamer Member Posts: 10,898 ★★★★★

    Gamer said:

    The point is that he is probably not the only one who still has more 6* dupes
    , than he should have

    Gamer said:

    It really doesn’t matter to most asides from top 20 so why bother abudt I’m get it it’s right but It what it is

    I’m Agerd and that’s one don’t get me wrong but I’m for let’s said u got it then rank3 him ect then get take away the dups is so mut woser but then again own failures to rank a champions op u was aware of wasn’t right I’m get the point but you ikow he wil get him max sig sooner or later it just matter of time
    Still is 100 sig stones. Which they cost quite a lot of money

    Now if someone rank namor up, then they should get a specific namor rank down ticket
    The problem here is he already had the stone if it has happened to someone with node stone at all ther wil ben a lot more isuse
  • KattohSKattohS Member Posts: 717 ★★
    I have a 6* and I wished they had dup’d mines by mistake during this whole debacle.
  • Pratham26Pratham26 Member Posts: 21
    Integrity went out of the window when RNG was introduced in video games . OP , why dont you just ask support for your answer.If you know others who have the same issue , why not state their names . Just adding seatin's name to the post doesn't make this credible or make him smaller. JUST ASK SUPPORT.... THAT'S WHAT IT'S FOR.

    ( not trying to be rude , but this just seems pointless . Either contact seatin himself or clarify with support)
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • New_Noob168New_Noob168 Member Posts: 1,585 ★★★★

    And how do you know if he didn't get another 6* namor recently... Stop making trouble.

    He uploads his openings? Has only been opening 6* featured? Go ahead and show us him pullIng Namor, he documents it all. Stop making trouble.
    Uh, you are assuming he uploads all his openings.
  • H3t3rH3t3r Member, Guardian Posts: 2,882 Guardian

    And how do you know if he didn't get another 6* namor recently... Stop making trouble.

    He uploads his openings? Has only been opening 6* featured? Go ahead and show us him pullIng Namor, he documents it all. Stop making trouble.
    Uh, you are assuming he uploads all his openings.
    Why wouldn't he upload a 6* opening or Cavalier crystal opening.? Only things he doesnt document much is War and Aq.
  • Kabam MiikeKabam Miike Moderator Posts: 8,269
    Thank you for bringing this up, but we will not discuss actions taken on individual accounts on the forums. We will look into this, but will not be giving updates on somebody else's account.
This discussion has been closed.