Why nerfs are hands down the worst idea EVER....

I'd like to start off with, many spend cash, time, and all kinds of in game resources to build their squads accordingly. Calling for a nerf of ANY champ is pointless. We have 6* champs coming soon. If anything, we should be calling for more buffs to the champs that will be BLATANTLY obsolete in such coming times. Content is already challenging even with some previously mentioned champs that are "too OP." We will be handing Kabam cash/time on a silver platter in exchange for table scraps if top champs are nerfed. There's already a scramble going on to rank up off beat champs to increase defender diversity in AW. Do you REALLY think the people who've invested their time, sometimes money, and effort to build up their champs want to hear noobs whine about a nerf? No, they don't. I never hear vets calling for nerfs as they've invested the time to learning how to defeat the tough champs. When you call for a nerf, you're waving a flag that says "I can't do it so no one can." It shows you aren't willing to get better. More over, it typically shows you haven't allocated these champs, in turn have no real experience using them. Also, in Act 5 they've introduced new abilities to the tiles. They're already rather difficult for those who are more advanced than I am. I REALLY don't think anyone wants to go in with less than they already have. I know I don't, and I don't have half the champs people are screaming nerf at. So in conclusion, perhaps get better at the game before whining in the forum, and screaming nerf. Better to ask for pointers and advice. Just my 2 cents.
5
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
i agree with u act 5 is challenging to every sort of players and the nerfing demandes are just a sort of :
-people who got banned ( revenge)
-inexperienced players aka summoners that are new to the game and found it hard to progress (they wanna progress overnight when people did it in years ).
-people who are inactive and can't have a specific champ and the list goes on .....
personaly id like to see some crazy hard content than nerfing a champ.
It is too easy to dismiss people asking for nerfs as “noobs” or “unskilled.” It is just as likely, if not more so, that people who don’t want nerfs are just scared about losing their easy way to defeat the harder content.
If people spent a lot of money to buy their way to better champions, that is their problem. Game balance is very important to the enjoyment and survivability of any game, and it doesn’t just affect the people who are trying to buy their way to the top.
Insulting people who want nerfs is immature and really does nothing to enhance the debate. There are valid reasons for nerfing the god-tier champs and buffing the bottom tier. I wrote a reply to the other topic outlining my opinion, but the topic was closed before I could post.
The reason a lot of the newer champs go for such high arena cutoffs is because they are so much more powerful than the older champs. People don’t grind for them because they want a Marvel character they like or because they want to try playing as a different character. They do it to get the champs they know are OP. The problem with this is that it creates a never ending cycle of creating new ways to be OP. By balancing the new and old champs, Kabam can create demand by creating champs with new playstyles that are fun and unique instead of these immune-to-everything, super-powerful, buffs-all-the-time-for-no-reason champs they’ve been pushing out.
That is not the only reason behind wanting buffs and nerfs. Period. Balancing the champions makes the game more challenging and fun for everyone. I have some of the god tier champions, and frankly, they’re getting boring. I could take a lower champ to make it harder, but that would feel like a waste of my time. I will probably need these god tier champs for the harder content, but that is because Kabam keeps having to make the content harder to provide a challenge for these god tier champions. Again, it’s a never ending cycle.