Announcing QS’s synergy nerf with SW immediately after selling prerelease bundles feels super shady

2»

Comments

  • Aomine_Daiki10Aomine_Daiki10 Member Posts: 1,643 ★★★★★
    Well is obvious that people will keep on spending so don't expect any change from kabaam. As long as the money keep coming in they have nothing to be worried about. I just don't see how I will buy a product and keep getting scammed time after time. Everything is RNG based in these game even what is purchased with real cash has no guarantee of giving you what you purchased for. When buying anything from kabaam just know it is subject to change so when it does you know you expected it.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 21,764 ★★★★★

    DNA3000 said:

    Lordabck said:

    It was shady from the beginning. When there was no limit to Prowess, that time I was sure about it. US and Canadian citizens should visit consumer court. These champs are Kabam’s product, when they sell something they just simply can’t change things in the name of Meta. Wait for the Quick silver nerf now. Never purchase from them until and unless they confirm that, champs won’t be nerfed.

    You should try reading the ToS you agreed to when creating your account. You have zero legal standing. In fact, you don't even own your own account. The ToS states they can make changes at any time to anything in the game. Good luck in court.
    Terms of Service can’t override consumer laws.
    No they can't, but a) the consumer laws that apply to products in the US and Canada do not apply to services and b) if you believe the TOS is unenforceable, you are legally required to cease playing the game. You are not allowed to ignore the TOS and still use a service that the service provider *only* provides to people who accept the terms of service. That would be fraud and theft of service, which would expose you to both civil penalties and criminal penalties.

    In other words, arguing the TOS is unenforceable has only two possibilities, both bad - for you. You lose, and you lose. You win, and you're admitting to two separate crimes in a court of law. Good luck with that.
    Yes, that may be the case in the US and Canada, but the legal standing applied is for the country where the game/app is offered and received in, so countries like Australia goods and services offered online are subject to the Australian Consumer Law. The TOS are enforceable except where they go against the ACL. Stating that they will enforce a TOS violation where it goes against the ACL is an offence (similar to a no refund sign, which are illegal in Australia unless where they say “except in line with Australian Consumer Law” or similar). Australian Laws will uphold the contract for the company (or TOS) but the illegal portions of the TOS cannot be held up. Case law is applicable in this regard to guarantees are not to be excluded, restricted or modified by a term in the contract. (Insight Vacations Pty Ltd v Young (2011) 243 CLR 149; 276 ALR 497; [2011] HCA 16.

    You will also likely find similar case law in other parts of the world.
    Again, The bundle offers QS, 5 crystals 3 boosts and 6* shards.

    Was QS changed? No.

    Did you get champs from crystals? Yes.

    Was Scarlet Witch offered in the bundle? No.

    You have no legal standing here. There's not a single court in the world that would rule in your favor.
    I think you are mistakenly thinking I am talking about civil court here. I am actually talking about an offence punishable for misleading advertising (I believe the penalty is up to $1.1 mil). So it’s not about finding in favour of me (you will find I have made no mentioned if I have purchased or not). It’s about whether they have advertised something and not provided EXACTLY what was advertised (including a synergy)
    The synergy wasn't advertised.
  • Real_Madrid_76_2Real_Madrid_76_2 Member Posts: 3,547 ★★★★★
    Ftp supremacy😎
This discussion has been closed.