MrMaat ★★
Comentarios
-
the assumption is if you did it on UC you would have done it on master no items used. if you did it on master you would have done it on heroic no items used. however i do believe if you used items on UC on one path and you ran it 6 times you would have likely used items all 6 times. but how do they give everyone exact…
-
personally i didnt use any items on clearing him so this is all bonus for me. i have done him on UC 5 of the 6 time solo so far. but it does seem odd everyone gets 1 package only. i mean it would only be reasonable to assume that if someone beat him 6 times they used more items then if they had of only beat him once.
-
yeah u could easily do it with much less.... all that being said depends on your skill... i know i did act 4 with my 3/30's for initial completion.
-
r u not in a an alliance? can you friend peeps in you alliance??? have you tried global chat???
-
it all stems from top allies scheduling their matchmaking to avoid each other. forcing the matchmaking algortithm to search lower down to find matches. another benifit to being lower tier. Never have to deal with this kinda ****. always plenty similar allies looking. matchmaking yesterday took bout 3 seconds
-
here is where i would love to say this is wat happens when you are near the top and noone else similar is looking for a war... but this should be a last resort style matchup... something that only happens after say like 3hrs of searchging. this is pretty darn ridiculous...
-
rewards for someones death is disgusting.... ways to commemorate him are a different story. a special event based around him would be great. because it could be used as a way to tell a story. but the one thing i wanted was a Stan Lee profile pic.
-
i dont believe it... video or it never happened....
-
not everymonth has something. it used to be only 2nd months did. its really strange... one minute there seem to be people complaining there is too much content and not enough time and too much stress, not enough energy... nek minute peeps are complainng there is not enough. it seems there will always be someone unhappy…
-
that number is not what would have been inputted. that number would be shown there as the result of a calculation done elsewhere. so it would be somewhere else a number was wrong and it would throw off an entire calculation. or where it should display 85 would actually be referencing a cell in a data base and instead of it…
-
lol... awesome... well noticed...
-
That is very odd then if it was a quick matchup...
-
No allinaces closer looking at the same time. They were the closest to be found. I bet this matchmaking took ages too. And if it waited longer to find a closer match you would probably complain it took tooo long. Its not kabams fault noone close to you was looking at the same time
-
There is multiple threads on this. No need to start another. To be banned there must be reason. The whole ally benifits from cheating whether or not u know about it. Merged thread here https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/108235/alliance-war-season-issues-again-merged-threads/p4
-
Something that could and should be looked at. We are not expecting full point recalculations but a reasonable assumption that the alliance cheated against would have won and therefore entitled to the win bonus
-
if kabam are the worst then you really have not played many games. kabam are far from perfect but no gaming company is. there are many companies worse. some bigger and some smaller. but there are many many companies worse. look at the whol EA lootbox fiasco. or the whole FOXNET thing with MSF. (even seatin stopped playing…
-
retype what you said. make sure it is not rude. and it will stay up.
-
2 week break unless they say otherwise.......
-
it would have been a very simple data entry error. the person inputting the data for Aegon would have simply put the wrong number and no percentage. the number in green is like that because it reads the data and shows watever the data reads. this is just a case of someone entering the wrong number and noone…
-
also too... an alliance can have a high tier and a high war rating but only play 1 or 2 bg wars and only play one or 2 a week so would end up gold quite easily. impossible for an ally ith a war rating of 868 to get gold 1. my ally is in t10 atm... our war rating is currently 1300. we have climbed up winning 7 of our 9…
-
All i know is the game data is there. maybe they need to adjust what is saved in the logs, but all the game data is there. with some effort put in there could easily be enough info to review wars where cheeating has occured and see exactly what happened. they may need to employ someone to do this but they should.
-
AA is great for maso path.... shame you dont have him.... yondu sp1 healblock may help... but only if u time the healblock to not trigger maso.... so its tough... dunno if his healblock is long enough...
-
defences never hold up.... and i meant wat tier as in wat multiplier... ie tier 8 has multiplier of like 3 so 144k loss = 432k points, t12 is like 2.2 so a 195k win is like 429k..... so a loss while at higher tier can still be more points that a win while at lower tier. lots of allies in gold 3 are like t12 lots of allies…
-
gold wat??? wat tier were you when you streak started and wat tier are you now? also have you lost wars cus you are not playing well or are you scoring like 145k but still norrowly losing??
-
not saying that either of these are sparky but he does have 2 very solid tech champs there both in GG and Ultron.
-
just curious as to how you cover that AQ with those donations? gold and battlechips seem very low.
-
upgrade your contract... pay an additional fee... lol
-
maybe he is australian... these bundles are normally $46.99 for aussies
-
exactly if they cheated and you lost by 1000 points or less it is very reasonable to assume that had they not cheated you would have won. exactly how many point would be considered a reasonable amount would often be affected by the manner of cheating used. for example. 1. if piloting is used the results would probably be…
-
F.Y.I. please be careful when talking bout cheating there are some words that may result in your post requiring admin approval before it is allowed. h_a_c_k will trigger the filter.