Updated AW rewards: Still tone deaf
spaceoctopus
Member Posts: 1,111 ★★★
This is not a complaint about the rich getting richer, I have zero problem with those who put that much effort and resources into AW getting great rewards, this is about reward distribution.
Our alliance is typically tier 6, we normally place silver 1.
All of our opponents have rosters full of 5/65s and 6/2s. I assume they’re in the same boat as us, we play AW as a pastime and don’t put resources into it.
None of the new rewards do much of anything for us, especially since we can earn more than that in one week of AQ.
Where Kabam is missing the mark is in the t5 basic and class shard distribution. That’s what would make it worthwhile. As is 2% for platinum 4 seems extremely low for a class, that’s 2% after 6 weeks of waiting. After one whole year that’s only about 16% of a t5c, and those would rarely all be the same class. That’s a reward that should be going to bronze, or even stone. That low amount of shards isn’t going to upset any balance whatsoever.
Our alliance is typically tier 6, we normally place silver 1.
All of our opponents have rosters full of 5/65s and 6/2s. I assume they’re in the same boat as us, we play AW as a pastime and don’t put resources into it.
None of the new rewards do much of anything for us, especially since we can earn more than that in one week of AQ.
Where Kabam is missing the mark is in the t5 basic and class shard distribution. That’s what would make it worthwhile. As is 2% for platinum 4 seems extremely low for a class, that’s 2% after 6 weeks of waiting. After one whole year that’s only about 16% of a t5c, and those would rarely all be the same class. That’s a reward that should be going to bronze, or even stone. That low amount of shards isn’t going to upset any balance whatsoever.
29
This discussion has been closed.
Comments