Best Of

My account is decently sized and I am up to date with the meta. My prowler is sig 160+ up until now he was one of my top 5 champs so he would always spook fear in the minds of the noobs everytime I make my climb to GC. I cant count up to 5 times I've ever drafted him since I became valiant in 2023. He stayed that long despite being used because i would always just hit GC hit 200 points and get my radiance and dip. I never played SERIOUSLY. But I've began to start pushing recently.

And as you keep adding and subtracting every time new champs come in there only is so much a ban bait can do. Also, no player who has indepth knowledge of the game is banning a r3 prowler over some of the other OP champs i try to sneak in lol.

AS for the sigs i don't consider him being worthy of generic sig stones in this day and age given how rare it is. Its just 200 sigs for decent damage. He's not even a great option for the mutants.

I can name you "9" tech champs YES 9 TECH CHAMPS (Maker included) that I'd place above prowler but this is a maker centric thread.

I also still run 6* kate, Hulkling and 7* r2 phoenix (solely for zola and sentinel) even though I now have karolina and r2 sinister (for bullseye). Even 6 stars made the deck over him.

After getting soo much dupes from Titans i don't trust my luck with those crystals anymore, i'm going for Zola simply because is a guareented result even tought i have the maxed out 6 star version

Also wouldn't mind a stronger version since i also use him as attacker sometimes

November is rumored to be a Spiderverse month

Hey buddy, this is on the Trello board and is called out as an unintentional bug.
It will be fixed very soon.

The constant sales are getting overwhelming for a lot of players, to the point where they are quitting the game, or reducing their spending like me. So, if they're going to do that, then they need to have a fair and "balanced" plan.

I've said as much elsewhere, may as well repeat it here.

This compensation package is, in a way, actually perfect. In a technical sense, it's quite literally the best and most direct compensation they could provide as it's overcorrecting and addressing the issue at hand. Zola wasn't in the crystal, people had a 0% chance of getting him; Kabam's response? Giving you Zola directly if you opt for it.

In that sense, the compensation is perfect - and I mean that genuinely.

In another sense, it's quite underwhelming and stops from being perfect because it appears to be limited to a single selector, regardless of how many crystals you opened or when you opened them.

As has been stated, in the past Kabam has issued a 1:1 compensation whenever incorrect crystals were purchased or when drop rates aren't what they have displayed. So … why is someone who opened twenty crystals getting the same as someone who opened one? Similarly, the petty part of me is wondering why people who opened crystals after they were corrected are getting compensated at all. They weren't affected.

I opened twelve Titans and a Nexus - had no desire for a Zola, technically I had better odds at getting the champion I did want and still failed. Is that the point? No. The point is that the crystals weren't as advertised - compensation should be 1:1.

Now, if Kabam were to offer this selector compensation as a 1:1? THAT would be amazing. If their thought or concern is "well we can't do that because it would effectively just be giving away a max sig Zola." … okay, but let's assume that the crystals WEREN'T broken. Then someone theoretically had a non-zero chance of getting a max sig Zola if they were to opening an equivalent number of crystals, correct?