Best Of
Re: At a loss with the summoner fest event
I'm sorry but if there's NO way you can place #1 without having to spend, it's called a PAY TO WIN event.They are unobtainable even if you do pay, unless you also basically do everything. Normally the term pay to win refers to games where either whomever pays the most wins, or spending offers an overwhelming advantage compared to everything else. But that's not really true here, except in an essentially unrealistic extreme. Spending offers an advantage between two players who otherwise are tied in all other respects, but having an advantage between two competitors who otherwise do exactly the same things equally well is not pay to win, that is literally all competitions.There are ranked rewards, which will be unobtainable unless you payI wouldn't call it pay to win. Sure, spending could be a tie breaker for points, but if you don't do everything, especially Raids, no amount of spending is going to catch you up.There are 300,000 total earnable points, so yes you can reach the top milestone, even if you miss a few.Why do you make everything p2w?
Well, technically speaking $24,000 USD might catch you up. But even among the mega whales I suspect the number of people who will actually do that is very close to zero.
Since about a third of the realm points are in Raids, and my alliance doesn't do raids (much less Nightmare Raids which seems to be required to cap out the milestones) I'm basically out of it. But the event is still giving me a ton of rewards for basically just playing the game more or less as I normally do, so I can't be too upset. I find it ... odd that there's so much emphasis on Raids given their presumptive optional nature - and the fact they are tied to alliances, meaning individual players cannot simply choose to do them just for the event - but I suppose Kabam has its reasons there.
I would call that pay to win

8
Re: Yeah cheating is extinct
He's definitely smoking something but respectfully how do you throw that round 3... domino did her stuff for you
Re: So that's quite a lot.
It's so they can say they're giving away $10,000 in prizes to first place while that $10,000 only costs them about $1.25 in someone's labor to put it into their account.There's no cash reward for winner?
Just MCoC pixel money? 💀
Kinda crazy.

12
Re: VALIANT EVENT QUEST - CHECK IN!
Who thought increasing the last 3 quest to 28 fights includung doing the boss 6 times would be a good idea?

11
Re: Yeah cheating is extinct
When did anyone say it's extinct?Probably went to see the new Jurassic Park movie and learned a new word
Yeah cheating is extinct
His killmonger and mysterio is rank 1.
I have nothing to say. My domino is rank 2 , serpent and photon is rank 3


I have nothing to say. My domino is rank 2 , serpent and photon is rank 3




11
Re: At a loss with the summoner fest event
The real thing I don't understand about this event is: If the game team truly intended to set up the point thresholds this way, why did they bother making it a realm event?
The "realm" aspect of an event is meaningless if an individual has no vested interest in the performance of the community, and are solely focused on their own progress. It might as well have been a solo event.
If we look back at the first (unofficial) realm event, the necropolis run, we can see that the whole community rallied around that effort. Why? My theory is:
* The barrier to entry for an individual was challenging but reachable (a single run of necropolis)
* Once that barrier to entry was passed, the individual would receive all rewards achieved by the community.
These two elements meant that you, as an individual, had an incentive to achieve that necro run for yourself, and then you had an incentive to both cheer other people on, and do your own additional runs, with knowledge that you'd be helping out the community.
With this format, where individual thresholds will always be stricter than community targets, the community aspect of this event is simply irrelevant to every individual. It's a footnote. Nobody is going to do more than necessary to help our their friends, because they can't help their friends with their individual thresholds. And they couldn't do more than necessary even if they wanted to, because each individual's contribution is strictly limited.
I just don't get why they bothered to structure this in this way. If they simply made this a solo event, they probably would have gotten a lot less frustration. The community is looking for something to rally around. This is, by construction, simply not it.
The "realm" aspect of an event is meaningless if an individual has no vested interest in the performance of the community, and are solely focused on their own progress. It might as well have been a solo event.
If we look back at the first (unofficial) realm event, the necropolis run, we can see that the whole community rallied around that effort. Why? My theory is:
* The barrier to entry for an individual was challenging but reachable (a single run of necropolis)
* Once that barrier to entry was passed, the individual would receive all rewards achieved by the community.
These two elements meant that you, as an individual, had an incentive to achieve that necro run for yourself, and then you had an incentive to both cheer other people on, and do your own additional runs, with knowledge that you'd be helping out the community.
With this format, where individual thresholds will always be stricter than community targets, the community aspect of this event is simply irrelevant to every individual. It's a footnote. Nobody is going to do more than necessary to help our their friends, because they can't help their friends with their individual thresholds. And they couldn't do more than necessary even if they wanted to, because each individual's contribution is strictly limited.
I just don't get why they bothered to structure this in this way. If they simply made this a solo event, they probably would have gotten a lot less frustration. The community is looking for something to rally around. This is, by construction, simply not it.

24
Re: Raid comp
This comp is only for the raids as we've said, not for any of the other issues this week.
Re: Raid comp
my guess for comp 5 100% raid revives and thats itClose

Absolutely insane that this is all the comp we get for the **** state the game was in since Wednesday and I'm not talking about Raids only. Now we wait for next livestream to have another big sale announcement before cyberweekend as per usual lmfao