Best Of
Re: Kabam NERFED MYSTERYIUM store(100% true)
At least now you only need to spend 9k per week, because only one bundle is not trash value.
Re: Mysterium store
Which one got removed?6 star sigs, 500 7 star shards and a t6b/t3a selector I'm pretty sure
Zuro
9
Re: Updated Trader's store
Not just that. We f### need 7 of each to take someone to r2 and forget r3 or r4 but Kabam this is the biggest blunder on store BUFF they ever did . Absolute junk. Also the increased the cost of gold bundle from 500 to 600 FOR EXACT SAME GOLD AND ISO WTF ? R u kidding not only they hyped it but didn't even updated the gold iso bundle and we get absolutely jack **** on that too? Hope people makes more sound about very bad update lost making me loose interest in playing now
Re: Updated Trader's store
Why exactly are we still gatekeeping t6b and t3a? @KabamPinwheel
ahmynuts
6
Re: Mysterium store
The 5500 one now gives twice as many selectors, through, so you're getting 4 selectors for 11k instead of 26k in the old store.
...the bigger problem is that we need more than 4 a week.
...the bigger problem is that we need more than 4 a week.
Re: Kabam NERFED MYSTERYIUM store(100% true)
I don't know if the store overall is worse than it was before, but I at least feel pretty confident in saying that it really isn't any better and the effort put into it wasn't worth it. It is the same amount of ho hum it was before at best. Feels like another time waster.
Furrymoosen
36
Kabam NERFED MYSTERYIUM store(100% true)
This is not a rant video it is the truth. I'm someone who struggles with gold as Valinet and I know for a fact gold +iso used to cost 500 but now it's 600 WITHOUT ANY BUFF to good or iso in the deal? Anybody seeing this?
Also it's literally the same t6b and t3A in the store and what the h they are even thinking updating 7* shards from 500 to 625? Really was that even worth it? Are u guys serious? We need 7 t6b and 7t3a to take a 7* to r2 and ignoring r3 and 4s why the f Mysterium store not even giving atleast 4-5 of each of these cats? If not full 7? What the hell was the point of this buff entire community is fed up with the shortage of the cats as VALIENTs.
Also it's literally the same t6b and t3A in the store and what the h they are even thinking updating 7* shards from 500 to 625? Really was that even worth it? Are u guys serious? We need 7 t6b and 7t3a to take a 7* to r2 and ignoring r3 and 4s why the f Mysterium store not even giving atleast 4-5 of each of these cats? If not full 7? What the hell was the point of this buff entire community is fed up with the shortage of the cats as VALIENTs.
Montycarlo
37
Re: Please Make the New Mode Permanent
And thats fair feedback! Ultimately gotta try things and see what folks think. Seeing lots of positive reception once folks are able to play it but also want to get this kind of constructive feedback too to make it better!But the new event gets stale and repetitive after you figure out what's expected and do it once. And also it lacks any fighting mechanics, but has all the new type of card interactions that probably took noticable time to code.The plan is more that we'll have more variety in side quests and be able to swap between more diverse varieties. Want to combat the current status of side quests feeling a little stale and repetitive.Dreadful logic.So we finally discovered what you believe to be competitive. Totally RNG-based, grind-focused content. Got it. Please spare us any future posts from you about BGs.Read what I said in the last sentence. For a mode to be Competitive there has to be a level playing field which this mode does by giving everyone the same access to champs. Nobody is locked out of competing just because they don't have the champs or have them leveled up. I am consistently getting 900 points every reset by using the same strategy every time. You complain about it being too RNG focused yet BGs is literally the exact same and even worse.
First you have to get the champ, then you have to get the resources to rank them up, and finally you have to make sure you draft them. All of this is RNG that even requires money to achive.
The reason why I said a 2 star meta is because kabam doesn't have the technology to make it so your roster in one mode is separate from your roster in the main game. If I said kabam should give us 52 seven stars fully maxed out for a BGs meta they couldn't do that without actually giving those champs to keep permanently. Obviously there will be attacker and defender nodes along with the usual rules that will boost the health values so that fights wouldn't be done in 10 seconds.
When everyone has access to the same character all at max rank, the only deciding factor is who plays better not who spent the most.
I imagine we can’t call the premier league competitive then because some football clubs are richer, and spend more on players than others..I would say its more a single player mode with a competitive element than a straight up competitive mode. After all its the side quest still, but with an added leader board element. There is strategy and decision making in terms of how many swaps you do and when you do them, but yes also rng plays its role for sure.Are you expecting this release this type of game mode on a permanent basis?
I'd rather play something like that thing for top progression level where you swap champs every 3 fights. Add some rng there, like start with a limited deck like bg and give selection of 3 champs from 5-8 and then lock used champs for several 3 fights sections with random nodes or defenders. Or just challenging fights with objectives like it was for suffering season. Or just say that this month sq is arena, imo it would be somewhat similar to the new mode (I never play arena except since special events)
