Best Of
Re: The Blubberiest Whale in the Ocean
I'm higher than all of those guys. I've finished top-6 in Banquet several times. Focus less on the money and more on what is pro-player, pro-fairness, and pro-fun.
Re: The Blubberiest Whale in the Ocean
I thought my $5k per year for several years was bad…
Re: Why not send 10 etherion in the mail to Valiants?
Thinking about this more, sending us 10 etherion would allow us to get full rewards without even touching Elder difficulty. Let’s do it.
September dev diary.
I personally think it’s still lacking and the dev team need to test their new systems very well before implementing them live in the game. We can’t have a trend of mishaps only for them to be resolved after a very long time ( adaptive EQ ).
Paragon gauntlet should have taught the mcoc team not to make classic difficulty compulsory to enter elder difficulty… but do they listen ? NO !! Do they care if we are screwed over ??? NO!!!
As for spider woman’s balance update it’s still not what I was hoping for… removing ensnare is just not it.
Re: Was he taken out back?
Well said. Pretty much how I feel as well.
This game feels way too cliquey a lot of the time. Para-social BS is way too common. Maybe some of these kids will grow up some day, or face hard reality when the game which they've made their identity shuts down.
Re: Was he taken out back?
Well now we know why Spider Woman need a nerf, hard to watch your baby Photon not being the top Science champ. 🤣🤣🤣.
Serpent is perfect and Spider Woman is too OP, why? Because I designed Serpent 🤣
Also the same person saying, Kabam should stick to their plan and not let the community pressure them.
So essentially say don't listen to your customers concern, don't listen to your customers when they tell you ar mistreating them, don't listen to your customer when they tellijg you they don'tl like your product anymore and will stop spending. That right just stick to what the company plan even if it is wrong.
Also said that Kabam think that Spider Woman is too strong offensive, hence why she need the nerf, pretty much saying that Kabam lied on their announcement.
Doesn't we just "love" that level is smartness 🤣
The Blubberiest Whale in the Ocean
You know me. I have the sixth-largest account in the game and the highest Prestige in the world. On average, I have spent more than $25,000/year on this game, and sometimes a lot more. I am privileged to be in this position. I am very mindful of that. It seems to me that you need to be reminded of the fact that you exist because of the players, and not the other way around.
The last time I failed to buy a newly released champion from early release bundles was The Serpent in March 2024. To be sure, I think I spent at least $1,500 trying for him, but no dice. Guess what? You didn't nerf The Serpent. You didn't nerf Onslaught, or Enchantress. But, you nerfed "defensive" Spider-woman. And you made sure to nerf her by also nerfing her offensive kit. You advertise **** logic, and then you even go against that. You could have just removed SW's Ensnare on defense, and despite all of the loud community voices calling for that, you decided to nerf her on offense anyway. Your disingenuous nature continues to be noted.
I have often read and heard it said, "Kabam needs money. They don't need your money." Well, they **** need mine. No matter how good Dracula or Frankendurrdurr are, I am not buying them. What faith would I have, even if they are good, that they would be allowed to be good just a few months later? None.
Kabam, you did this. It's fantastically unfortunate that your processes have led to so many enthusiastic players being so disillusioned with your game. From my perspective, leave SW alone, or at least leave her Ensnare on offense. But that's not going to happen, is it? NO ONE should buy any of your newly released champs. If you do, you could be buying a Lexus that is PLANNED to become a Mercury Cougar.
To anyone that has any comments about my spend or whatnot, you should know that I would have to try a lot harder to care about you. I'm the players' advocate. If you insist on being a poverty shill for Kabam, then have fun with that.
Re: Was he taken out back?
By and large I presume other CCP creators are not directly commenting on this out of a sense of respect and decorum. Most of the content creators in the CCP, and this includes Vega himself, respect the program and the participants enough to respect the relatively private nature of the discussions and interactions within it. Why Vega decides to do what he does is his own story to tell. No one should read their own interpretations into the absence of commentary, although I suspect most people will.
Here’s what I’m willing to state. My own direct interactions with Vega were less frequent than with some others, but they were generally respectful, and I agreed with some of this stances and disagreed with others. He was not the lone voice of dissent in the CCP by any means, nor do I believe he ever implied he was. I believe the farthest he went in his video was saying he was a minority voice in the specific ways in which he took some of that criticism to logical conclusions, and in that I would agree. I cannot speak for Vega or anyone else for that matter, and I have no insight or knowledge of any private interactions he had with other CCP members or the Kabam people, but there was some definite friction that came about in what I will call here Vega’s style. This happened even in some of my interactions with Vega, although I never took any of it personally myself. I simply understood Vega was often a very pointed advocate. But this does come with challenges in groups.
As far as I am aware, Vega left the CCP of his own accord, and even he states this. He did say that he felt a discomfort that I will paraphrase as feeling “unwanted” but that’s a thing only he can or should elaborate upon, as that’s a personal feeling. To the extent that I know any of those details, that’s wholly not my place to disclose. What I will say is the narrative that Vega was kicked out of the CCP because Kabam didn’t like his feedback is at best ludicrously oversimplified, and I think Vega would agree that’s not the foundation of his issue with the CCP. It is quite a bit more complicated than that.
The opposite narrative going around is this is just Vega trying to farm clicks. I don’t know him personally myself, but I don’t believe that either. As I said, Vega is a very pointed advocate, and I think he’s doing what he is doing because he believes in it, whatever it is. I think he feels what he is doing is the best thing for his own advocacy goals. The fact that how he thinks and what he does is not always obvious to other people encourages people to fill in the narrative with something they find easier to understand. He’s a drama queen, he’s trying to get attention, he’s farming views. These are easy narratives to promote, but I don’t think they capture the complexity of real people.
I’m not saying I agree with his stance, or that I think it even makes sense to me per se in all respects. But real people march to the beat of their own drummer. They do what makes sense to them. They don’t usually care if their internal logic doesn’t make sense to others. If there’s one thing I can say about the CCP, as is true in any group of people, even when people agree no two people arrive at the same conclusion by the same path. The number of times I have found myself in agreement with someone, but could not make heads or tails of how they arrived at the same conclusion as me, is uncountable.
Agree with Vega, disagree with him, take up his cause or ignore him completely, that’s up to others to decide for themselves. The one thing I would say is don’t fill in the gaps in the narrative with easy spackle. It is basically always wrong. I think of all the things we might have disagreed with, this is something for which I believe Vega and I would be in complete agreement.
Re: They partially went back on Spider Woman Nerf,not completly
“I’d have two nickels…which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it’s happened twice!!”
(I really hope y’all get this reference 😂)
Re: September dev diary.
And fairness of competition means if you want to go for the rewards at the top then you face the accounts you might not want to face