Best Of
Re: The Huge dependence on raids should have been announced earlier
What the heck do you mean by not all players are supposed to get the rewards ? Mr Wisdom you still seem to not get the point. You are looking at this from your perspective not from an endgame players vision, which if you are will want to complete all the milestones. Its an event, an event that you can fully finish if you complete all the requirements and most of the requirements just spell out -"Do all the events in the game and you will get points"..so yeah players who do that will get the rewards..again most of the endgame players who play BG, AW, raids..monthly content.If you're trying to do EVERYTHING, then perhaps. However, that's really an elective process. It's also extreme. Not all Players are meant to get all Rewards. Quite honestly, I'm playing as usual and whatever I pick up will be fine. It's not essential to do everything and get every Milestone, and people shouldn't drive themselves crazy if it's not in their wheelhouse, when you consider the Rewards, especially the last several ones. Some Titan Shards and a few extra thousand Gem Shards aren't worth that much stress. I suspect they didn't want to encourage everyone to go all out. That's not an essential thing.It's not absolutely essential, though.you mind elaborating on that mr wisdom? would you rather I spend thousands of dollars when i could have very well switched alliances, participated in raids and reached the last milestones had I been informed prior?
why dont you lay out a spreadsheet and see where you land on the milestones without a single point from raids?
The ranked rewards are not something all players are supposed to reach obviously cos its a whaling contest ..but the normal milestones in a community event/celebration like this, this was just poor communication.
Re: The Huge dependence on raids should have been announced earlier
I guess they assumed anyone worth a damn ( to kabam), was always doing raids anyways.

8
Re: The Huge dependence on raids should have been announced earlier
It's not absolutely essential, though.Good luck getting the top milestone without raids
Further Update?

While this is something, I’m left wondering “is this really the best they can do?”
The update is about as hot of a hot mess as you can get. Communication is either (a) in Announcements with no opportunity for feedback or (b) a quick Whack-A-Mole response to a silly or easily dismissed post. Interaction on real issues or questions pretty much nil (again, lone exception being Pinwheel).
Disappointing, to say the least.
Dr. Zola

23
Re: Is it just me or did Wheel of Fate destroy Enchantress’s defensive aura (Battlegrounds specifically)
No. She is still extremely annoying with the right set of nodes. Power gain enchantress or unblockable becomes a real pain
So that's quite a lot.

Battlerealm Brawl 2025 champion will get such rewards including 250k+ units. It seems like Kabam didn't want to think about resources at all and just shoved units everywhere

17
Re: So that's quite a lot.
It's so they can say they're giving away $10,000 in prizes to first place while that $10,000 only costs them about $1.25 in someone's labor to put it into their account.

23
Re: Vox in cosmic aw showcase path causing degen
Looks like the Dormammu bug is spreading.
Re: At a loss with the summoner fest event
Last year's Battlegrounds Realm Event was absolutely nothing like this Realm Event. I placed top 4 overall without spending a single penny.Nothing new really for realm events. Banquet was the exact same.I'm sorry but if there's NO way you can place #1 without having to spend, it's called a PAY TO WIN event.They are unobtainable even if you do pay, unless you also basically do everything. Normally the term pay to win refers to games where either whomever pays the most wins, or spending offers an overwhelming advantage compared to everything else. But that's not really true here, except in an essentially unrealistic extreme. Spending offers an advantage between two players who otherwise are tied in all other respects, but having an advantage between two competitors who otherwise do exactly the same things equally well is not pay to win, that is literally all competitions.There are ranked rewards, which will be unobtainable unless you payI wouldn't call it pay to win. Sure, spending could be a tie breaker for points, but if you don't do everything, especially Raids, no amount of spending is going to catch you up.There are 300,000 total earnable points, so yes you can reach the top milestone, even if you miss a few.Why do you make everything p2w?
Well, technically speaking $24,000 USD might catch you up. But even among the mega whales I suspect the number of people who will actually do that is very close to zero.
Since about a third of the realm points are in Raids, and my alliance doesn't do raids (much less Nightmare Raids which seems to be required to cap out the milestones) I'm basically out of it. But the event is still giving me a ton of rewards for basically just playing the game more or less as I normally do, so I can't be too upset. I find it ... odd that there's so much emphasis on Raids given their presumptive optional nature - and the fact they are tied to alliances, meaning individual players cannot simply choose to do them just for the event - but I suppose Kabam has its reasons there.
I would call that pay to win
Spenders had an advantage which was being able to purchase Units in order to buy elders BUT they still had to play the game AND win BG matches in order to rack up points.
This "Summoner Fest" is an absolute joke towards competition, it's a PAY to WIN event.

9
Re: At a loss with the summoner fest event
Nothing new really for realm events. Banquet was the exact same.I'm sorry but if there's NO way you can place #1 without having to spend, it's called a PAY TO WIN event.They are unobtainable even if you do pay, unless you also basically do everything. Normally the term pay to win refers to games where either whomever pays the most wins, or spending offers an overwhelming advantage compared to everything else. But that's not really true here, except in an essentially unrealistic extreme. Spending offers an advantage between two players who otherwise are tied in all other respects, but having an advantage between two competitors who otherwise do exactly the same things equally well is not pay to win, that is literally all competitions.There are ranked rewards, which will be unobtainable unless you payI wouldn't call it pay to win. Sure, spending could be a tie breaker for points, but if you don't do everything, especially Raids, no amount of spending is going to catch you up.There are 300,000 total earnable points, so yes you can reach the top milestone, even if you miss a few.Why do you make everything p2w?
Well, technically speaking $24,000 USD might catch you up. But even among the mega whales I suspect the number of people who will actually do that is very close to zero.
Since about a third of the realm points are in Raids, and my alliance doesn't do raids (much less Nightmare Raids which seems to be required to cap out the milestones) I'm basically out of it. But the event is still giving me a ton of rewards for basically just playing the game more or less as I normally do, so I can't be too upset. I find it ... odd that there's so much emphasis on Raids given their presumptive optional nature - and the fact they are tied to alliances, meaning individual players cannot simply choose to do them just for the event - but I suppose Kabam has its reasons there.
I would call that pay to win
Yeah, it is almost certain that a whale will rank first on that one too, however any f2p can try to compete for that spot (again, it is extremely unlikely that a f2p will get it, but the possibility is there)that's always been the case, even arena. you can get everything for free or pay a bunch of money to buy some time and convenience.I'm sorry but if there's NO way you can place #1 without having to spend, it's called a PAY TO WIN event.They are unobtainable even if you do pay, unless you also basically do everything. Normally the term pay to win refers to games where either whomever pays the most wins, or spending offers an overwhelming advantage compared to everything else. But that's not really true here, except in an essentially unrealistic extreme. Spending offers an advantage between two players who otherwise are tied in all other respects, but having an advantage between two competitors who otherwise do exactly the same things equally well is not pay to win, that is literally all competitions.There are ranked rewards, which will be unobtainable unless you payI wouldn't call it pay to win. Sure, spending could be a tie breaker for points, but if you don't do everything, especially Raids, no amount of spending is going to catch you up.There are 300,000 total earnable points, so yes you can reach the top milestone, even if you miss a few.Why do you make everything p2w?
Well, technically speaking $24,000 USD might catch you up. But even among the mega whales I suspect the number of people who will actually do that is very close to zero.
Since about a third of the realm points are in Raids, and my alliance doesn't do raids (much less Nightmare Raids which seems to be required to cap out the milestones) I'm basically out of it. But the event is still giving me a ton of rewards for basically just playing the game more or less as I normally do, so I can't be too upset. I find it ... odd that there's so much emphasis on Raids given their presumptive optional nature - and the fact they are tied to alliances, meaning individual players cannot simply choose to do them just for the event - but I suppose Kabam has its reasons there.
I would call that pay to win
next week's poker game mode or whatever is going to be the same thing.
In this one you have a cap on points, meaning the only way to rank 1 is spending money