Best Of

Not every thought is worth a new thread

This HAS to be a bait post, because Bastion wrecks shop.

As someone who hasn't ranked Bastion and has no interest in ranking Bastion, I can confidently say that this entire take is completely, and horrifically inaccurate.

Sometimes part of the strategy is throwing a match that you have no chance of winning by tossing champs you don't need in a matchup you can't win. This doesn't guarantee a win, but significantly increases your chances of winning because you are now stronger for the last two rounds. Your idea (which, sorry, is awful), would make this an overpowered strategy and give one player a significant advantage in the final two rounds. You would lose purposely against one tough defender, throwing away a champ that isn't useful in the remaining rounds, and then get to remove another strong defender, or possibly attacker, that you don't have a counter for or is a perfect counter against you. There is no argument against that being an absurd advantage.

Too many losing players have the mindset that fair gameplay is hidden behind putting the players they lose against at a disadvantage, and then make absurd suggestions that such actions wouldn't give them an advantage where there shouldn't be one.

Bro is schizophrenic

It's surprising there hasn't been a bigger uproar about this. My alliance is quite active yet struggles to hit the 2nd milestone. @Kabam (Osaurus) Rex very disappointing change.

At this point, I don't think it's fair to say that BGs has its own alliance event, lol. There's a dusty, two-year old BG alliance event that's still hanging around, but it's no longer relevant to the game economy and people have stopped chasing it (…speaking as an officer in a formerly BG-focused alliance).

sentinel is a good dual threat or red skull

I will after this