Best Of
New relics going into the same crystal?
Do we know if new relics are going into the existing crystal pools when they eventually release? There have been conflicting statements at different times.
Also, when relic pools were expanded in the past, I think it was done 2 at a time. Is that what we’re expecting here?
Also, when relic pools were expanded in the past, I think it was done 2 at a time. Is that what we’re expecting here?
TyEdge
5
Anti-cheating update for June 2025
Today we opened up a new front in the war against cheaters. For the first time, we have deployed new technology that allows us to identify players using a client that was not distributed by one of our legitimate partners or by Kabam. In doing so, we found and banned over 10,000 accounts that have been using modified or otherwise illegitimate versions of our client to play the game. Another couple thousand accounts have received warnings for potential infractions, and if you received this warning know that your account will have more scrutiny on it moving forward. If you are in fact using an illegitimate client, now is the time to stop.
We believe this action will result in a massive improvement to the overall anti-cheat ecosystem, as the vast majority of players caught and banned for cheating so far this year failed this test.
Moving forward, all Summoners should be aware that using a client other than one distributed by us or our partners puts your account at risk of a permanent ban.
We believe this action will result in a massive improvement to the overall anti-cheat ecosystem, as the vast majority of players caught and banned for cheating so far this year failed this test.
Moving forward, all Summoners should be aware that using a client other than one distributed by us or our partners puts your account at risk of a permanent ban.
MCOC Team
48
Re: My first 7 star....
@Mrbruh7658 KUDOS!
also, mutants that get prowess real easy keep popping up in nodes all over. you’ll get better mutants, but Emma is still a great asset (no pun, I swear) to have. EQ, BG in the correct meta, special quests… You get to the jacked up Punisher 2099 monster (Glykkan??), she’s actually awesome for that as well.
also, mutants that get prowess real easy keep popping up in nodes all over. you’ll get better mutants, but Emma is still a great asset (no pun, I swear) to have. EQ, BG in the correct meta, special quests… You get to the jacked up Punisher 2099 monster (Glykkan??), she’s actually awesome for that as well.
Re: who do i ascend
if you have the ressources to rank up onslaught and potenntially learn his playstyle his the best option here . if you have to choose from your r5 i would say galan benefits the most from it + okoye is a good option . kushala abs dpx aree also nice
t123459
4
Re: who do i ascend
Ultron would be another good candidate. Very sustainable, immunities, multiple dot effects…
Re: who do i ascend
Since you’re thronebreaker, ghost. You won’t be using 5*s a lot anymore, but having her ascended as an option will be helpful.
Will3808
2
Re: Battlegrounds Matchups is disgusting and unfair
I’ll chime in saying on the way to GC I feel dirty from raking up forfeits after people see my deck. I’ve never seen match making quite this rough. I think the right answer is fixing the seeding thoughIn principle, it is. In practice, its complicated because seeding affects rewards.
The reason we seed at all is because there are rank rewards in GC. Which means anyone who enters GC can theoretically get free rewards forever if there was no seeding, because once you're in GC you can't demote out of it.
And while that's fixable, trying to fix that one problem causes a whole bunch of things to come apart as you pull on that thread. Eventually, you've changed everything about tiers, ranks, and rewards, and you essentially have built an entirely new game mode.
The desire to make these "fair match ups" is so high, Kabam themselves tried to do it several times in the early days of BG even though we already established it is completely broken in Alliance war. Remember prestige/rating matching in AW? It took Kabam two years to give up on it, while we had to see season after season after season after season of alliances full of Uncollecteds placing super high in war seasons. I think one season an alliance like that placed second overall.
Knowing this, they implemented it again in BG when there was absolutely no chance for any other result than what happened. And then tried to patch it over and over. Seeding is itself a path of sorts. I actually suggested that patch as a way to mitigate some of the match up problems in BG as a way to soften the problem without completely tossing out the structure of BG. But it is a mitigator, not an eliminator.
At the end of the day, either you have to face stronger opponents to progress past them, or you don't. If you don't, the entire game mode becomes a mockery of competition. If you do, then the only question is how. It would be nice if each individual player saw a slowly escalating ramp up of match ups rather than the cliff we used to have or the random jumble we have now, but those are side effects of how the game mode works. If you try to prevent this by actually putting in explicit rules to prevent it, you're back to horrible results.
I did suggest a kind of match up metric phase in/phase out mechanic way back when, but the specifics of trying to make that actually fair are non-trivial.
DNA3000
2
Re: Event Quest Titles: a legal analysis
This is the kind of content that makes forums great 
