Best Of

Re: Do not take cure. Feel hunger. Be zombie

You are not alone. Have alliance mates asking for the cure in our group chat. Bunch a quitters…

Giantwalrus56

2

Re: Tired of arguing with strangers in the forums? Go to Battlegrounds and fight it out!!!

is this kindergarten

Fit_Fun9329

11

Re: Tired of arguing with strangers in the forums? Go to Battlegrounds and fight it out!!!

Losing a round to him should count as a whole match loss

MrSakuragi

26

Re: Initial Thoughts On Dracula?

Everyone is talking about the lagacy video as proof hes mid as if he didnt openly say he wasnt going to use slow combos which was stated multiple times in the deep dive to be the optimal way to play him lmao.

WednesdayLength

-4

Re: Dracula and Frank are not good. Buffs? No? Well, KABAM LOGIC.

They're not about to buff Champs that have been out for all of 5 minutes.

GroundedWisdom

6

Re: Initial Thoughts On Dracula?

people need to gtfo with “slow combos.” Yeah, that’s gonna work great in a high leverage matchup with this AI…

Herbal_Taxman

2

Re: Dracula and Frank are not good. Buffs? No? Well, KABAM LOGIC.

And now Dracula is replacing Juggernaut and Purgatory in AQ raids 😂 have fun with that…

Capricious

7

Dracula and Frank are not good. Buffs? No? Well, KABAM LOGIC.

Hey Kabam,

Your newest champions are almost universally received as what I like to call "ass." You graded Dracula's damage as 4/5, and it is very clearly not. It's more like 3/5, or possibly 3.1119745/5. Clearly, no one should buy him from early release bundles. But, here is the question: Are you going to buff your forgettable most-recently-released champions? Dracula is way below a 4/5 damage-dealer. You said he was 4/5, and you were wrong. How are you going to make it right? Totally fair after Spider-Woman was nerfed after being better on defense than 3.5/5, right? Please, thrill us all with your justifications and acumen! Thank you for your attention to this matter!

Love,

The Blubberiest Whale in the Ocean