**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Account Sharing Bans - InfoBot "Services"
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Round 2...whackidy wack
Allegedly banned for it. They don't share the reasons why so they could have violated any random part of the TOS. Proof is never shown.
No process is flawless, but I'm not sure in what context you're questioning which process. I don't think anyone is saying installation tracking is perfect: in fact most people are arguing it is not. I'm simply stating that the process you implied was something Kabam could get wrong is something that is literally handed to them by Apple (or Android). It isn't something *they* can get wrong. The system itself isn't perfect of course. But there aren't very many moving parts to go wrong either.
Within the context of people saying "Kabam can't track you" I'm pointing out they can, and in fact the vendors of the mobile devices themselves provide tools to do so. That isn't the sum total of everything Kabam or any other mobile vendor can do, it is just one piece. And it is not perfect, but nothing is perfect. People go to jail on the basis of imperfect information. I don't think the standard of proof for losing one's mobile game account is higher than that.
Confirmation bias is when someone believes something and then tends to remember every time the facts supported that belief and forgets or minimizes every time the facts contradict that belief.
As far as I can tell, you haven't given any evidence for the claim that a large majority of alliances use account sharing. You've simply asserted this to be true. The only logical reasoning you've presented in the thread in this context is the argument that since most alliances account share, and those alliances haven't been disrupted by the recent ban waves, this proves Kabam isn't banning for account sharing alone. That argument relies on the presumption that most alliances account share and this account sharing is known and detectable by Kabam, it doesn't attempt to prove it to be true. And by your own admission, you state you can't provide evidence of this because you state it would be against forum rules.
As I see it, there's good reason to be skeptical. Sharing your account login information with another person you do not know well on the internet (or even someone you do know well) is extremely risky because you are giving that person full control of a game account you could have spent thousands of hours and a lot of money to build up, especially for top tier players. All it takes is one person to get drunk, angry, or careless, and your account is gone with almost no hope of having it recovered. That's an enormous risk to take, and claiming that a large majority of the top players do this, regardless of the actual percentage, is making a very bold claim about the naivete or the risk-blindness of top tier players. 1% of top tier players might be that crazy or stupid. But a large percentage? I would need proof to accept that statement.
I'd love for my best friend in the world to try out my 5* spidy but afraid it would violate the TOS, wish there was a better way @Kabam Miike
I just see people saying that Kabam's system is flawless and there is no way someone could be banned incorrectly. I just can't agree with that I guess. I don't think Kabam is gunning for people sharing accounts honestly. Seems odd to me that a company losing players because of in game glitches/bugs/issues would want to lose even more. Opinions I guess.
I never said anything was flawless. I said the process is thorough, and that Account Sharing is against TOS, and has been enforced. Nothing in life is completely flawless. As for the argument of bugs, they're not likely to set rules and allow people to gain unfair advantages by cheating, just to soften the blow of glitches. That makes no sense at all. The fact of the matter is, Account Sharing has always been against TOS. Those Terms are what we all agree to when we play their product. No reasonable company would set rules and allow people to break them simply because there are ongoing issues. Quite frankly, they wouldn't be rules. However, in this case, they are. Sharing affects the entire system, as well as those playing by the rules. It's a major imbalance.
Will be bann?????
I never said kabam was going to let **** slide because of glitches. Regardless if you want to believe it or not they are losing players daily because of all the **** updates and issues so wasting time on "sharing" seems like a waste of effort. People sharing accounts isn't hurting my gaming experience but the horrible updates and bugs sure will.
Kabam won't have a game to push updates for unless they get things in order. 2020 content is laughable at this point.
No. Multiple Devices are allowed.
Anybody can use a proxy or vpn. Not against tos