I only agree because Kamala Khan is cosmic and we have too many good cosmic champions already. IF they buff her she will certainly catapult to one of the best champs in game and I already have her at r3 so if they will keep it cosmic I say go ahead and buff her.
I have both Kamala Khan and Angela. They both are limited to arena fodder so I think if you have a decent roster it doesn't matter who is better. It's certainly not big enough to come to a consensus. If I had a choice though like I had to use all cosmics 5 stars on a path, more than Iikely I would take Angela instead of Kamala.
All of you just come with the same points yet the videos prove you wrong.
The videos demonstrate what one person can do with a particular champ. Champions are not reworked based on what one person can do. They are reworked based on what everyone in the game collectively can do with the champ, something that is difficult for any one player to determine, but which shows up collectively in the datamining reports the game spits out. If Kamala Khan is on Kabam's list of candidates to be buffed, that can only mean their reports say that when used by the playerbase as a whole she underperforms the average by enough to be considered underperforming (among other things). Nothing any one person says will change their mind once that happens, unless you can somehow prove the data mining reports wrong about what they are saying about all players in the game, not just the ones that are particularly skilled.
To put it another way, take Stark Enhanced Spiderman. Conventional wisdom says he is a top performing champion. However, we don't know how most players use him. If most players get a high percentage of his usable performance out of him, then he would be a top performing champion since his ceiling is so high. But on the other hand if 90% of the players who use him die while trying to push their luck building poise charges, then he'd be considered underperforming by the devs and no amount of videos by expert players would change that judgment. If I had to guess, I'd say Sparky is a better than average champ where some percentage of players get huge results from him but the rest of the players pull the average down to moderately above average, rather than the stellar results we see from the videos posed by self-selected skilled players using him.
I have a 6 star Angela to get the most out of her you gotta cycle sp1 to keep the furies up and throw in a couple heavies for some serious damage. Cycling her sp1 sucks because you literally do like no damage
Angela has no utility what so ever, Kk has more utility. Angela tho on basic attacks hits harder but due to her special damage lacking KK can finish long fights faster but short fights Angela wins there
No one said they were reworking her. They may in the future, but she was on the list because it was comprised of the lowest scoring among the data they collected.
You don’t really know what you are talking about.....Miike specifically stated that all the champions who were on the list for the community choice update would be getting buffed it was just a matter of deciding in what order.
No one said they were reworking her. They may in the future, but she was on the list because it was comprised of the lowest scoring among the data they collected.
You don’t really know what you are talking about.....Miike specifically stated that all the champions who were on the list for the community choice update would be getting buffed it was just a matter of deciding in what order.
Yes, a bit late on that. Someone already pointed that out. Thanks anyway.
No one said they were reworking her. They may in the future, but she was on the list because it was comprised of the lowest scoring among the data they collected.
She is on the list for a rework. I really want her to get one.
No one said they were reworking her. They may in the future, but she was on the list because it was comprised of the lowest scoring among the data they collected.
She is on the list for a rework. I really want her to get one.
Yeah I didn't see the comment that they're all getting worked on. Someone pointed that out. I agree. She's been a Meme for far too long. The OG one at that. Lol.
I'm taking out of this what I've always thought, Angela is a bit overrated, guess the healing makes her sustainable with suicides. Nobody mentioned that healing (as weak as it is) is a valuable utility. But somewhat agree with op khamala really isn't as meme tier as her rep goes, she's prob mid level. Also another utility for kk is her synergy with sparky for 7 hit combos off a parry
Comments
To put it another way, take Stark Enhanced Spiderman. Conventional wisdom says he is a top performing champion. However, we don't know how most players use him. If most players get a high percentage of his usable performance out of him, then he would be a top performing champion since his ceiling is so high. But on the other hand if 90% of the players who use him die while trying to push their luck building poise charges, then he'd be considered underperforming by the devs and no amount of videos by expert players would change that judgment. If I had to guess, I'd say Sparky is a better than average champ where some percentage of players get huge results from him but the rest of the players pull the average down to moderately above average, rather than the stellar results we see from the videos posed by self-selected skilled players using him.