I'm having a really difficult time seeing what your problem, and not just because you ignorantly commented on my own post about She Hulk. From where I stand, you objectively have no merit in the situation, and if you do, you haven't offered any true critiques / criticisms to the argument. All you are doing is telling people what they should / should not feel, which is completely unproductive.
As for everyone else affected (like I am), I do hope we receive the gold / ISO we invested. Taking SH to Rank 5 was no affordable endeavor, and I can only hope--if this is the true direction we are going--that we have the chance to make a new rank-up decision.
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
In the she hulk fix compensation it says resources and iso and gold is technically a source of resource so in reality we should get the gold and iso back
If I were to rank up she hulk to R4 to test her am I then able to use the rank down ticket to put her back to r3 if I decide she isn't worth that rank? Or if you rank her up can you then not use the rank down ticket?
Sorry if this sounds a stupid question, just want to see if it's worth ranking her to test out if she's worth R4 and can still put her back to 3 if I decide she isn't?
Despite the people who stand behind the 'be happy with what you got' movement, this is still absurd. I ranked up She Hulk to R5 LONG before she was deemed a 'cheat code' by the community.
I ranked her up for one reason: enjoying her mechanics. Like I've said before, I liked the ability to play a character differently than all the others. I didn't care about the furies. I didn't care about the Slow. Hell, I didn't even care about the Petrify. I enioyed just playing with her.
Taking a champ to R5 is not at all affordable, and it's a decision a player makes when they truly enjoy the respective champ. To have me rank her down WITHOUT receiving either ISO / Gold is ludicrous. Yes, I get that some champs are modified down the road, but the fact that this 'bug adjustment' came SO soon after her update, you can't expect players to just eat it as a loss. What would honestly keep them playing if they're going to be royally screwed over?
If I were to rank up she hulk to R4 to test her am I then able to use the rank down ticket to put her back to r3 if I decide she isn't worth that rank? Or if you rank her up can you then not use the rank down ticket?
Sorry if this sounds a stupid question, just want to see if it's worth ranking her to test out if she's worth R4 and can still put her back to 3 if I decide she isn't?
A ł p h a
I want to say I think so, but mine is already R5 so I'm not sure. But if you make that decision you will NOT receive the ISO / gold you used to rank her up--so that sounds like too costly for a trial.
If I were to rank up she hulk to R4 to test her am I then able to use the rank down ticket to put her back to r3 if I decide she isn't worth that rank? Or if you rank her up can you then not use the rank down ticket?
Sorry if this sounds a stupid question, just want to see if it's worth ranking her to test out if she's worth R4 and can still put her back to 3 if I decide she isn't?
A ł p h a
If you have the Tickets, they're yours to use until the cutoff date.
If I were to rank up she hulk to R4 to test her am I then able to use the rank down ticket to put her back to r3 if I decide she isn't worth that rank? Or if you rank her up can you then not use the rank down ticket?
Sorry if this sounds a stupid question, just want to see if it's worth ranking her to test out if she's worth R4 and can still put her back to 3 if I decide she isn't?
A ł p h a
If you have the Tickets, they're yours to use until the cutoff date.
Incase I wasn't clear, yes. You can test her out and use a Ticket after.
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
He's not wrong you know. People who used rank up gems on her are now able to use the RDT on her and get basic cats back in return. Essentially trading a 2016 class specific gem for generic items that can be used on anyone.
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
He's not wrong you know. People who used rank up gems on her are now able to use the RDT on her and get basic cats back in return. Essentially trading a 2016 class specific gem for generic items that can be used on anyone.
True, but at this point, it's really collateral damage. It would likely be too much work to go back and convert individual cases.
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
He's not wrong you know. People who used rank up gems on her are now able to use the RDT on her and get basic cats back in return. Essentially trading a 2016 class specific gem for generic items that can be used on anyone.
Yep or trade Variant 4 to 5 science gems to rank any class.
They also do not return the content you completed with her nor reverse the rewards earned, fair trade IMO.
Why would they reverse anything on anyone? How do you deem who is deserving of punishment and who isn't? I've heard the same argument about folks who used Loki versus 5.4 Ultron, or Ghost for Variant 3. Would you punish players who found a niche champ that is perfect for certain situations?
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
He's not wrong you know. People who used rank up gems on her are now able to use the RDT on her and get basic cats back in return. Essentially trading a 2016 class specific gem for generic items that can be used on anyone.
True, but at this point, it's really collateral damage. It would likely be too much work to go back and convert individual cases.
What it does is allows people to use a backdoor to potentially have essentially a 4-5 generic rankup gem instead of science specific if they use it on SH and then reverse it. That's a massive deal
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
He's not wrong you know. People who used rank up gems on her are now able to use the RDT on her and get basic cats back in return. Essentially trading a 2016 class specific gem for generic items that can be used on anyone.
True, but at this point, it's really collateral damage. It would likely be too much work to go back and convert individual cases.
What it does is allows people to use a backdoor to potentially have essentially a 4-5 generic rankup gem instead of science specific if they use it on SH and then reverse it. That's a massive deal
It's still Science. The difference is the pool they can use the Resources on. I wouldn't say it's massive. It's limited to the number of people who used their Gem on Shulk.
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
He's not wrong you know. People who used rank up gems on her are now able to use the RDT on her and get basic cats back in return. Essentially trading a 2016 class specific gem for generic items that can be used on anyone.
True, but at this point, it's really collateral damage. It would likely be too much work to go back and convert individual cases.
What it does is allows people to use a backdoor to potentially have essentially a 4-5 generic rankup gem instead of science specific if they use it on SH and then reverse it. That's a massive deal
It's still Science. The difference is the pool they can use the Resources on. I wouldn't say it's massive. It's limited to the number of people who used their Gem on Shulk.
The T5B aren't science, that's generic and can be applied to ANY champ of ANY class. Also it would apply to people who are sitting on a 4-5 Science gem now who can choose to do what I said and then undo it
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
He's not wrong you know. People who used rank up gems on her are now able to use the RDT on her and get basic cats back in return. Essentially trading a 2016 class specific gem for generic items that can be used on anyone.
True, but at this point, it's really collateral damage. It would likely be too much work to go back and convert individual cases.
What it does is allows people to use a backdoor to potentially have essentially a 4-5 generic rankup gem instead of science specific if they use it on SH and then reverse it. That's a massive deal
It's still Science. The difference is the pool they can use the Resources on. I wouldn't say it's massive. It's limited to the number of people who used their Gem on Shulk.
The T5B aren't science, that's generic and can be applied to ANY champ of ANY class. Also it would apply to people who are sitting on a 4-5 Science gem now who can choose to do what I said and then undo it
You think many people are sitting on a 4-5 Gem who would Max out Shulk just to convert it to Cats?
You think many people are sitting on a 4-5 Gem who would Max out Shulk just to convert it to Cats?
Actually, yeah, yeah I do. I also personally know a few people who used a 4-5 gem on her previously. If the number is more than 6 digits that's still more than say what we saw my recent AW rewards bug.
I did the same thing to rank HT. I definitely would not have used that rank down ticket had I known I’d miss out on all that gold, and iso. PLEASE FIX.
Lol so apparently we're not supposed to talk about the huge loophole you guys left in where people can trade their rank up gems in for cats now? Just gonna delete posts about it?
He's not wrong you know. People who used rank up gems on her are now able to use the RDT on her and get basic cats back in return. Essentially trading a 2016 class specific gem for generic items that can be used on anyone.
True, but at this point, it's really collateral damage. It would likely be too much work to go back and convert individual cases.
What it does is allows people to use a backdoor to potentially have essentially a 4-5 generic rankup gem instead of science specific if they use it on SH and then reverse it. That's a massive deal
It's still Science. The difference is the pool they can use the Resources on. I wouldn't say it's massive. It's limited to the number of people who used their Gem on Shulk.
The T5B aren't science, that's generic and can be applied to ANY champ of ANY class. Also it would apply to people who are sitting on a 4-5 Science gem now who can choose to do what I said and then undo it
You think many people are sitting on a 4-5 Gem who would Max out Shulk just to convert it to Cats?
Comments
As for everyone else affected (like I am), I do hope we receive the gold / ISO we invested. Taking SH to Rank 5 was no affordable endeavor, and I can only hope--if this is the true direction we are going--that we have the chance to make a new rank-up decision.
Sorry if this sounds a stupid question, just want to see if it's worth ranking her to test out if she's worth R4 and can still put her back to 3 if I decide she isn't?
A ł p h a
I ranked her up for one reason: enjoying her mechanics. Like I've said before, I liked the ability to play a character differently than all the others. I didn't care about the furies. I didn't care about the Slow. Hell, I didn't even care about the Petrify. I enioyed just playing with her.
Taking a champ to R5 is not at all affordable, and it's a decision a player makes when they truly enjoy the respective champ. To have me rank her down WITHOUT receiving either ISO / Gold is ludicrous. Yes, I get that some champs are modified down the road, but the fact that this 'bug adjustment' came SO soon after her update, you can't expect players to just eat it as a loss. What would honestly keep them playing if they're going to be royally screwed over?
Its basically the V1 2015 gems all over again