**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Comments
I just hope they have a fair way of determining who only did it once and those who really abused the glitch. Fortunately, I'm not one who received anything because of it. For those who did, good luck in dealing with how Kabam doles out their "fairness"
Neither did I. Still itching for my first 5*, just 43 shards away! Hearing about the 6*s coming out a few days before I get my first 5* was disheartening.
We don't leave bugs in any longer than they need to. This includes ones that make the game harder for players. It's not fair to say that every bug that affects players is not acted on right away. There have been countless bugs that we act on and are able to fix as fast as possible, but some bugs take much longer, especially ones that are performance related, because they do not affect all players the same way.
For instance, there is a known issue where some players are experiencing trouble with game mechanics in fights. That requires engineering time, investigation, and then usually a HUGE change to the base of the game itself, while a server side fix on an issue like this is much simpler and can usually be done in a matter of hours.
Additionally, this is ignoring a lot of issues that negatively affect players that are dealt with very quickly. Those issues are usually something server side as well. If we had a simple way to just fix every bug with a little switch, we would do it, but that's not possible.
Agree. Mcoc need more care. We will always help to find bugs. U guys need to help us too by giving more better service.
@HoidCosmere
"Back in the day" you were able to chat with the opposing alliance during the PLACEMENT phase of your Alliance War. This was AWESOME because you could make a gentlemen's agreement to only place 2 star or 3 star champs, and then fight it out to see the best alliance win. This was done because the nodes were goddamn ridiculous, and AW was NOT fun.
Kabam, in all it's glory, decided that this was "unfair", and not the way we should play. They made up some story, but everyone knows that they were not making $$$$ on AW item use, and alliances were having too much fun. So they disabled the war room chat until the attack phase, and now "2 star wars" are impossible, as the agreement can't be made.
Completely pointless from a game perspective... Almost petty I would have said.
It's ancient history now, but some of us have looooong memories.
There have been MANY instances like this that HURTS the player, but whatever. We are still here, so they must be doing something right.
Well that was a poor decision. So many ways they could have stopped that practice without making it look like they were trying to stop that practice. Stuff like that makes them look like the spoiled kid in the sandbox.
Not that it matters much since Kabam is going to take all of the extra rewards away from players who did recieve them, but based on the above I am curious why player a (me) did not get them in the first place, but player b (the guy who just got banned for running the shortest path on easy 1000 times) did?
Just goes to show they have the means to do it but choose not to when it benefits them.
DRAX AND MORDO
It's not an exploit or bug. They've acknowledged it and even use it in champion spotlights now when talking about matchups. Drax (and some others) have a unique attack that allows them to bypass the ability because Kabam. No longer a bug and not an exploit.
What's this?
Drax bypasses astral evade of Mordo because his medium attack is a fast double-hit. They used this mechanic on why he's a good matchup vs vulture in vulture's spotlight (iirc).
Moon Knight medium is also a double hit if I remember, does that bypass Mordo astral evade as well?
Deciding not to fix it doesn't make it not a bug. They acknowledged that it wasn't intended.
Here's a link to the TOS, if you can find it in there, please let me know because I am very curious to see what wording they used to cover this issue:
https://www.kabam.com/corporate/terms-of-service/
Looks like it's a little less than half way down the page:
"9. Online Services/Your Responsibilities.
· Use features of the Websites or Services for anything other than their intended purpose, including exploiting glitches for personal gain;"
I appreciate the plight that the developers have of trying to keep this game bug free, I do. But, the fact of the matter is, each and every bug that is known about that is not fixed and costs a player units should be able to be refunded then. If not able to be refunded, I still take the stance that this would be considered an exploit for monetary gain. If a player "can not gain from a bug" why should Kabam be able to?
for the amount of money that alot of us have spent on this damn game, why not take advantage of thier **** design and flaws. they take an advantage whenever they can.
Shoe fits and all that
Welcome to the world of websnatch. He is entitled to his opinion and your opinion. You have no opinion in the school of websnatch. Classes held daily in a dang dark basement with poor lighting.