@Kabam Miike is our war rating going to be adjusted down before the end of the season? This should not be a difficult question
The War Rating adjustment should have been completed days ago when we said it was. If you don't think it has been, we need more information. You can start with your Alliance's name, and we'll let you know if there is more that we need.
The alliance name is DarkRealm Redeemers Tag RDMRZ. We won war 5 and our war rating was never reduced. Please let me know when this is going to happen
I'm sorry, I know why people are confused. There was no REMOVAL of War Rating for those that Won, just adding War Rating for those that Tied/Lost. I'll clear this up.
Please tell me this isn’t true? If this is the case, people advanced war rating and possibly war tier in a war that didn’t count (and we were told in advance it didn’t count). Why would that rating be allowed to stand when they may have faced an alliance (like many of us) that didn’t bother fighting since you told us it didn’t count and wouldn’t reimburse for item usage. This is even more unfair than I thought.
Adding War Rating to one side nullifies the Rating won on the other.
Please explain how. 2 alliances go into war 5 it 2000 rating. One gets bumped up to 2050 and one goes down to 1950 1950 then gets moved back to 2000 while 2050 stays the same. In what world does this "nullify" to you?
It's very simple. It's an interconnected system. War A wins and takes 50 WR from War B. War B loses their 50 WR. Which means War A is ahead 50. Giving the 50 back to War B means War A shows 50 more, but they're no further ahead because War B has their 50 back. So they're no longer 50 ahead. Get it?
Haha are you serious? Did you even read my example? The war ratings went from 2000 and 2000 to 2000 and 2050. After war 5 the winning alliance will be up by 100 until they remove the war rating from the losing alliance and then they will still be up by 50. Please don't go to the casino ever lol
How does an Alliance lose and keep War Rating? The loss of Rating is what they're correcting. Your example is not logical.
2 alliances that have 2000 war rating go into war 5 with +- 50. One alliance goes to 2050 and one goes to 1950 after war 5 before the adjustment which is a difference of 100. The 1950 alliance goes back to 2000 after the adjustment and the 2050 alliance stays the same. This is now a difference of 50 after their adjustment. So how does this nullify?
One allaince tanked on purpose one put in effort and was rewarded as such.
Sorry I'll never support punishing effort snd rewarding a lack of it in any way.
The winners earned those wins the losers didnt and I'm ok with them being set back to a null state(ie back to what they would be pre war)
We are the alliance that won war 5. I still think this is completely unfair
I think telling people war rating will be effected then having it be effected is unfair. Which was done.
My effort was based on a kabam employee telling me to out in effort to protect our rating. You want that removed because I didnt read the (corrected hrs later info that went against that?) Sorry punishing an allaince for following a direct message from kabam isnt ok
I agree with you. We were given directly conflicting information so how can they actually make this fair?
Hire competant staff to deliver messages. Stick to original message. Proceed
If by competent you mean incapable of making errors, prepare for a turnover rate that's astronomical.
My company fires people over errors like this all the time you tell a client something IT HAPPENS.
If it doesnt happen you lose your job.
Then the team makes your comment happen to satisfy the customer.
Closing this thread down now. I asked that we please keep this civil, and it has only gotten worse. We will release more information in announcements soon.
Comments