Matchmaking Discussion [Merged Threads]

GroundedWisdom

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

Worknprogress

Gmonkey said:

GroundedWisdom said:

Then you can't call it War. If people are of the impression that Alliances are entitled to their spots because they spent the most and therefore deserve the top, and no one will catch up to them, then shut War down because that's not a competition. It's a monopoly. People aren't being really measured by their performance. They're taking Squatter's Rights for their spot. We pay the most so we deserve the most? Right.

By your logic we should just hand World Series to the highest spender. The spending gives you an advantage, a large one but you can still lose spending the most. The reality is if you do not spend you will have a very hard time, that is true of anything competitive.

The #1 war alliance is nowhere close the top spending alliance either.

Worknprogress

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

GroundedWisdom

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

No. They weren't getting byes. They were fighting Alliances with strengths in the same range as their own.

Worknprogress

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

No. They weren't getting byes. They were fighting Alliances with strengths in the same range as their own.

No one cares if they were the same "strength" if they had to span 6 tiers to find the match

Manup456

@Arsoz what I’m saying is match with equal or close war ratings I don’t care what the hero rating is or anything else for that matter. Also when did Kabam put you on the team? Do they offer good benefits? Because I know for a fact I wasn’t looking for a response from you.

GroundedWisdom

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

No. They weren't getting byes. They were fighting Alliances with strengths in the same range as their own.

No one cares if they were the same "strength" if they had to span 6 tiers to find the match

They didn't just jump ahead. They earned their Tier based on their own Wars. You win, you go up. You lose, you go down. Same as anyone else. The fact that people keep holding on to this archaic view of how the system used to be and should be, but doesn't apply to Seasons, is ridonkeylous to me.

Worknprogress

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

No. They weren't getting byes. They were fighting Alliances with strengths in the same range as their own.

No one cares if they were the same "strength" if they had to span 6 tiers to find the match

They didn't just jump ahead. They earned their Tier based on their own Wars. You win, you go up. You lose, you go down. Same as anyone else. The fact that people keep holding on to this archaic view of how the system used to be and should be, but doesn't apply to Seasons, is ridonkeylous to me.

They absolutely jumped ahead by never matching people in their own tier. There are absolutely some ridonkeylous things in this thread and probably 99% of them have been said by you

Manup456

@Arsoz I was looking for a legitimate answer from mods not your opinions because I could careless for those. People can’t get any official answers when the thread is clogged with wanna be mods.

GroundedWisdom

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

No. They weren't getting byes. They were fighting Alliances with strengths in the same range as their own.

No one cares if they were the same "strength" if they had to span 6 tiers to find the match

They didn't just jump ahead. They earned their Tier based on their own Wars. You win, you go up. You lose, you go down. Same as anyone else. The fact that people keep holding on to this archaic view of how the system used to be and should be, but doesn't apply to Seasons, is ridonkeylous to me.

They absolutely jumped ahead by never matching people in their own tier. There are absolutely some ridonkeylous things in this thread and probably 99% of them have been said by you

They Matched people in their own Tier. People just don't like that lower Alliances had a higher Tier.

Mr_Platypus

Manup456 said:

Just when I thought AW was starting to make sense this happens. What numbers was this matchup based off?

How many BGs are you running btw?
If it’s 3 BGs then this is the first screenshot ive seen in this thread where there’s genuine reason for a complaint about matchmaking

Worknprogress

Arsoz said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

If an alliance has a lower war rating than their enemy and win the war that shows that they earned their win and that they were skilled enough to take down the defenders.Why should lower war rating alliances not be matched with higher war rating alliances they earned their points if they lose too bad if they win then good

Why should people with higher multipliers get matches that are statistically easier? Most alliances with low war ratings have those ratings for a reason. They're either far less skilled or don't make much of an effort. If you're in tier 3, you should be matching with other alliances at the same level. Same when you're in tier 10.

Worknprogress

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

No. They weren't getting byes. They were fighting Alliances with strengths in the same range as their own.

No one cares if they were the same "strength" if they had to span 6 tiers to find the match

They didn't just jump ahead. They earned their Tier based on their own Wars. You win, you go up. You lose, you go down. Same as anyone else. The fact that people keep holding on to this archaic view of how the system used to be and should be, but doesn't apply to Seasons, is ridonkeylous to me.

They absolutely jumped ahead by never matching people in their own tier. There are absolutely some ridonkeylous things in this thread and probably 99% of them have been said by you

They Matched people in their own Tier. People just don't like that lower Alliances had a higher Tier.

What? No they didnt. You had alliances in tier 3 matching with alliances in tier 9 and below just to balance "strength"

Manup456

@Arsoz I never at any point complained that it was to hard what I asked is what numbers was the match up based off. If they are basing it off war rating that’s a big difference why I asked.

Corby11

I.kinda find it hilarious that people are still saying they deserve top rewards because they win all of their wars.... as long as they don’t get anyone stronger than they are to fight.... If only real life was like that, no the big country can’t attack the little country it wouldn’t be a fair fight they need to look for another big country to fight. It’s a war, the strongest teams should win that’s the whole point of developing your roster and alliance .... become stronger gain more prizes. What kind of game rewards lack of overall progression by allowing the lowest rated players to cream the top rewards while players who have worked hard to build end up with table scraps. Pure nonsense can’t even believe some of the people championing this ridiculous notion aren’t doing it purely out of a desire to have people pay them some attention rather than a belief that it was ever anything other than a broken ill conceived system.

If you want to have different bands based on a rigorous set of constraints within a competition then each band should be competing for an entirely separate pool of rewards, if your all competing for the same rewards you should be able to matched with any other team in the competition regardless of prestige or strength. Not a difficult concept 95% of the people on this forum seem to have no problem understanding it.

Adios50

3x war gets an unbalanced opponent

Adios50

Adios50

Panchulon21

This might be the fairest matchup ive seen. Exact same war rating

CaptainGame

Y

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

Worknprogress said:

GroundedWisdom said:

The whole reason we're here is because people worried about what others have.

No we're here bc people were betting byes all the way through the tiers while never facing anyone in their own tier. Please try to keep up dear

No. They weren't getting byes. They were fighting Alliances with strengths in the same range as their own.

No one cares if they were the same "strength" if they had to span 6 tiers to find the match

They didn't just jump ahead. They earned their Tier based on their own Wars. You win, you go up. You lose, you go down. Same as anyone else. The fact that people keep holding on to this archaic view of how the system used to be and should be, but doesn't apply to Seasons, is ridonkeylous to me.

This is easy. No they didn’t.