**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Matchmaking Discussion [Merged Threads]
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
The mismatches is the exact issue I'm talking about. You seem to be the one ignoring the points I'm making. Doing things faster at the expense of honest Players is not something I'm willing to consider more than a more tempered transition.
I hear some people blaming mismatched alliances, which makes no sense. They played the system which was designed. What were they supposed to do? Lose matches just because they got easy matches. Most people playing the game don't care about the mechanics of matchmaking. If what they seem is fair, they go about their day. When matches become screwed, they complain in forums. If you see many people complaining, they have under 50 posts. Telling them that they were enjoying higher rewards simply is untrue because as GW said, according to them, they won their wars, and moved up. They were not looking at other alliances at all.
I agree that war rating is better in the long run, even GW agrees that though I doubt he will admit it. lol. But, kabam has to sort out the kinks in the system to prevent exploitation by so called high skilled high tiered players. As far as I see, they are the ones creating shell alliances and tanking and all that nonsense. I have not seen anyone abandon engaging with GW and post creatively. If you don'e want someone to reply? stop replying to them.
Also...
So not exceeding twice the size? Funny. A 10m matching a 20m is fair to you? Or a 15m matching a 30m?
See what I mean by subjectivity? You need to do ALOT better for ANY of your arguments to hold any ground (pun intended).
Taking war rating to 0 means the season has to be longer because we cannot have enough matches to find out the best alliance. It could be some metric of prestige, tier and alliance rating at the start of the season.
Guess what? A 40m alliance is now set at 0 war ratings, so is a 5m alliance.
Sometimes your suggestions really don’t make sense. (Seriously)
Forget it bro. He doesn’t dare to answer questions that he doesn’t have a counter point to.
Just look at what I asked him. Define “reasonable”.
His answer? Reasonable is... “reasonable”. Omg debate king of the year.
What’s your definition of it?
when i bought up a post that you made 2 years ago contradicting what you are saying now you had a go at me and told me not to bring 2 year old posts up in this thread.
here you are now bringing up 3 year old posts.
SMH...