Another dumb post. Too easy? Duh, use less OP Champs. That makes way more sense than complaining when the solution is in your hands. People with large rosters and top Champs claim new content is easier because they have those things. When your account was smaller and the counters weren't all there, was it as easy then?
Why didn't you just use less OP Champs or lower star versions to challenge yourself? Probably cause you didn't want the actual challenge or risk of having to use items that you knew could be saved by using your top Champs.
Problem solved, stopped whining.
So please explain to me what the point of building a roster in the first place is. Apparently I'm too simple to understand how much sense it makes for someone to spend a large amount of time and/or money acquiring something to never use.
No one said you can't. The point is, you are in control of who you use for content. If you want to use your big Champs, that's great, but it will be easier. If you want a challenge, then use your lesser Champs. You, and you alone, have the power to decide who you take into the challenges. If Kabam makes it too specific or combines nodes that completely stuck, they lose. If they reward players with nodes that benefit players rosters, apparently, they also lose.
Don't complain it's too easy if you go ham with your best roster though, and instead could be using other Champs to make it more challenging, if that's what you're looking for. Don't complain when you have the power to fix the problem yourself, but choose not to.
I can and will complain about whatever it is I don't agree with, just like everyone did incessantly about act 6.
It's not my job to make the game interesting, that's on the developers. If they can't keep certain sections of their playerbase engaged then that's their failure. You all say they needed to address story content to keep all the casual participation trophy crowd around, that's fine, they did that. If they fail to address the other end of the spectrum, those people either get bored and leave, stick around an complain like most of this forum membership did with Act 6, or just play casually and be barely interested in keeping up with the game.
What they choose to do and what effect that has on the game remains to be seen and as much as some of you claim to know what's good for the game, you don't really you're just making an assumption. One way or the other we'll find out where this goes and if it was a good move. Until then if I don't like something, I have zero intention of being quiet about it.
My last comment got reduced to atoms. FYI, the developers made the option for you to pick your team. They did their job in giving flexibility to make it more or less challenging. The rest is up to you. We all have our opinions, doesn't make yours right anymore than mine. However you do have a choice and an option to make content more challenging. If you disregard it, that's on you. Id rather play a fun game that I can make challenging, than a challenging game I can't make fun.
Comments