Agree that is hypocrytical to think that current system is ok while it is matching 2mil paragon accounts with 5mil paragon accounts
Rating is meaningless. Prestige is slightly less meaningless. It should be matching on your ability to win, like all other competitions on Earth do, including the actual Gladiator Circuit for Battlegrounds itself.
Agree with you that matching should be done on your ability to win. Currently in bg it is not that way. Bcos matchmaking is based on prestige and not on your ability to win
Kinda ironic that you mention this while also asking for matchmaking to be completely random in every league cause if it was, lower level players wouldn't really have a chance. So I think what you meant was matchmaking should be based on a Paragon's ability to win correct?... The entitlement lol.
You can check my previous comment. In Real life nobody is asking if you are poor, rich, white, black, small, high, fat or slim. If you are competing for something you should have similar chances (if game is fair). Of course the are details that increase or decrease your chances to win. And such detail in bg should be your roster and your skill. If we are forcing that only white people are competing with whites the game is not fair. Easy
What similar chances are you even talking about? If an UC player faces a Paragon in Bronze there are no similar chances that Paragon is getting the win no matter what and the UC player will be stuck in Bronze until they miraculously manage to get a streak with out getting matched with a single Paragon. Also, what a kind of dumb comparison is that? Races are all equal, accounts in the game are not, they'll be different depending on their progression.
Races are all equal but black guys are winning 100m sprint and white did not have a chance with them. And in my world it is ok. You know why? Because we are not equal. And I am ok with that. World does not work that way.
They did have a chance though (regardless of race), they're both at a similar level that's why they're competing against each other. You never saw an amateur sprinter compete against Usain Bolt in the Olympics correct? There's a reason for that, stop pulling out more strawman arguments it ain't helping you prove anything.
Thanks for proving my point. Amateur did not have a chance with Bolt and that is fine. But there is a chance that amateur will have a race with Bolt. And in Bg such a chance to fight against Bolt is not existing for amateur
So it's fine for an amateur to face someone miles above them skillwise but when it happens to you it's not fine and they need to make some changes. Do I need to spell it out more so you realize how entitled you sound right now?
What chance? Bolt never competed with an amateur sprinter in the Olympics lmao what are you talking about? Only thing that's been made clear so far is that you have zero common sense, and reading comprehension.
Agree that is hypocrytical to think that current system is ok while it is matching 2mil paragon accounts with 5mil paragon accounts
Rating is meaningless. Prestige is slightly less meaningless. It should be matching on your ability to win, like all other competitions on Earth do, including the actual Gladiator Circuit for Battlegrounds itself.
Agree with you that matching should be done on your ability to win. Currently in bg it is not that way. Bcos matchmaking is based on prestige and not on your ability to win
Kinda ironic that you mention this while also asking for matchmaking to be completely random in every league cause if it was, lower level players wouldn't really have a chance. So I think what you meant was matchmaking should be based on a Paragon's ability to win correct?... The entitlement lol.
You can check my previous comment. In Real life nobody is asking if you are poor, rich, white, black, small, high, fat or slim. If you are competing for something you should have similar chances (if game is fair). Of course the are details that increase or decrease your chances to win. And such detail in bg should be your roster and your skill. If we are forcing that only white people are competing with whites the game is not fair. Easy
What similar chances are you even talking about? If an UC player faces a Paragon in Bronze there are no similar chances that Paragon is getting the win no matter what and the UC player will be stuck in Bronze until they miraculously manage to get a streak with out getting matched with a single Paragon. Also, what a kind of dumb comparison is that? Races are all equal, accounts in the game are not, they'll be different depending on their progression.
Races are all equal but black guys are winning 100m sprint and white did not have a chance with them. And in my world it is ok. You know why? Because we are not equal. And I am ok with that. World does not work that way.
They did have a chance though (regardless of race), they're both at a similar level that's why they're competing against each other. You never saw an amateur sprinter compete against Usain Bolt in the Olympics correct? There's a reason for that, stop pulling out more strawman arguments it ain't helping you prove anything.
Thanks for proving my point. Amateur did not have a chance with Bolt and that is fine. But there is a chance that amateur will have a race with Bolt. And in Bg such a chance to fight against Bolt is not existing for amateur
So it's fine for an amateur to face someone miles above them skillwise but when it happens to you it's not fine and they need to make some changes. Do I need to spell it out more so you realize how entitled you sound right now?
No. In both case it is fine and fair. It is not fine that amateur will not have a chance to prove himself agains me or Bolt
Agree that is hypocrytical to think that current system is ok while it is matching 2mil paragon accounts with 5mil paragon accounts
Rating is meaningless. Prestige is slightly less meaningless. It should be matching on your ability to win, like all other competitions on Earth do, including the actual Gladiator Circuit for Battlegrounds itself.
Agree with you that matching should be done on your ability to win. Currently in bg it is not that way. Bcos matchmaking is based on prestige and not on your ability to win
Kinda ironic that you mention this while also asking for matchmaking to be completely random in every league cause if it was, lower level players wouldn't really have a chance. So I think what you meant was matchmaking should be based on a Paragon's ability to win correct?... The entitlement lol.
You can check my previous comment. In Real life nobody is asking if you are poor, rich, white, black, small, high, fat or slim. If you are competing for something you should have similar chances (if game is fair). Of course the are details that increase or decrease your chances to win. And such detail in bg should be your roster and your skill. If we are forcing that only white people are competing with whites the game is not fair. Easy
What similar chances are you even talking about? If an UC player faces a Paragon in Bronze there are no similar chances that Paragon is getting the win no matter what and the UC player will be stuck in Bronze until they miraculously manage to get a streak with out getting matched with a single Paragon. Also, what a kind of dumb comparison is that? Races are all equal, accounts in the game are not, they'll be different depending on their progression.
Races are all equal but black guys are winning 100m sprint and white did not have a chance with them. And in my world it is ok. You know why? Because we are not equal. And I am ok with that. World does not work that way.
They did have a chance though (regardless of race), they're both at a similar level that's why they're competing against each other. You never saw an amateur sprinter compete against Usain Bolt in the Olympics correct? There's a reason for that, stop pulling out more strawman arguments it ain't helping you prove anything.
Thanks for proving my point. Amateur did not have a chance with Bolt and that is fine. But there is a chance that amateur will have a race with Bolt. And in Bg such a chance to fight against Bolt is not existing for amateur
What chance? Bolt never competed with an amateur sprinter in the Olympics lmao what are you talking about? Only thing that's been made clear so far is that you have zero common sense, and reading comprehension.
Correct. Bcos amateur is too week to advance to Olympics. But in BG amateur can advance to GC
That doesn't apply when people start out in the same Bracket. There's too much of a range difference. To be precise, I'm not saying it's perfect the way it is. I've been pretty vocal about wanting something at the start to keep the lowest Players from being bashed around. At least in the beginning. However, being at the highest marker and not expecting to fight people as strong or stronger is quite frankly, entitlement.
But it is not the highest marker. This is happening in bronze 3. If it happens in vibranium that paragons face off against stacked paragons, it’s still understandable but it’s happening in bronze 3. So not the highest marker.
The highest progress marker. If people at the Paragon level are more overpowered by a Paragon than an UC Player, there's something seriously wrong. I'm sorry, but there is no way I can justify such a difference in the first Bracket. That shouldn't be a thing. For that matter, people want to be able to take out UC Accounts with a Paragon Account, because they don't want to face higher Paragons to start off. That's totally hypocritical.
Weren’t you saying progress in other modes should not dictate how you do in battlegrounds? And now you are talking about paragons and uncollected in battlegrounds? Try and stay true to your statements.
That doesn't apply when people start out in the same Bracket. There's too much of a range difference. To be precise, I'm not saying it's perfect the way it is. I've been pretty vocal about wanting something at the start to keep the lowest Players from being bashed around. At least in the beginning. However, being at the highest marker and not expecting to fight people as strong or stronger is quite frankly, entitlement.
But it is not the highest marker. This is happening in bronze 3. If it happens in vibranium that paragons face off against stacked paragons, it’s still understandable but it’s happening in bronze 3. So not the highest marker.
The highest progress marker. If people at the Paragon level are more overpowered by a Paragon than an UC Player, there's something seriously wrong. I'm sorry, but there is no way I can justify such a difference in the first Bracket. That shouldn't be a thing. For that matter, people want to be able to take out UC Accounts with a Paragon Account, because they don't want to face higher Paragons to start off. That's totally hypocritical.
Weren’t you saying progress in other modes should not dictate how you do in battlegrounds? And now you are talking about paragons and uncollected in battlegrounds? Try and stay true to your statements.
What I said is people shouldn't be automatically awarded progress in the competition just for starting because of their progress in other areas.
Agree that is hypocrytical to think that current system is ok while it is matching 2mil paragon accounts with 5mil paragon accounts
Rating is meaningless. Prestige is slightly less meaningless. It should be matching on your ability to win, like all other competitions on Earth do, including the actual Gladiator Circuit for Battlegrounds itself.
Agree with you that matching should be done on your ability to win. Currently in bg it is not that way. Bcos matchmaking is based on prestige and not on your ability to win
Kinda ironic that you mention this while also asking for matchmaking to be completely random in every league cause if it was, lower level players wouldn't really have a chance. So I think what you meant was matchmaking should be based on a Paragon's ability to win correct?... The entitlement lol.
You can check my previous comment. In Real life nobody is asking if you are poor, rich, white, black, small, high, fat or slim. If you are competing for something you should have similar chances (if game is fair). Of course the are details that increase or decrease your chances to win. And such detail in bg should be your roster and your skill. If we are forcing that only white people are competing with whites the game is not fair. Easy
What similar chances are you even talking about? If an UC player faces a Paragon in Bronze there are no similar chances that Paragon is getting the win no matter what and the UC player will be stuck in Bronze until they miraculously manage to get a streak with out getting matched with a single Paragon. Also, what a kind of dumb comparison is that? Races are all equal, accounts in the game are not, they'll be different depending on their progression.
Races are all equal but black guys are winning 100m sprint and white did not have a chance with them. And in my world it is ok. You know why? Because we are not equal. And I am ok with that. World does not work that way.
They did have a chance though (regardless of race), they're both at a similar level that's why they're competing against each other. You never saw an amateur sprinter compete against Usain Bolt in the Olympics correct? There's a reason for that, stop pulling out more strawman arguments it ain't helping you prove anything.
Thanks for proving my point. Amateur did not have a chance with Bolt and that is fine. But there is a chance that amateur will have a race with Bolt. And in Bg such a chance to fight against Bolt is not existing for amateur
So it's fine for an amateur to face someone miles above them skillwise but when it happens to you it's not fine and they need to make some changes. Do I need to spell it out more so you realize how entitled you sound right now?
No. In both case it is fine and fair. It is not fine that amateur will not have a chance to prove himself agains me or Bolt
If this was true you wouldn't be here complaining asking the devs to make the game unfair for other people so it's no longer unfair for you.
Agree that is hypocrytical to think that current system is ok while it is matching 2mil paragon accounts with 5mil paragon accounts
Rating is meaningless. Prestige is slightly less meaningless. It should be matching on your ability to win, like all other competitions on Earth do, including the actual Gladiator Circuit for Battlegrounds itself.
Agree with you that matching should be done on your ability to win. Currently in bg it is not that way. Bcos matchmaking is based on prestige and not on your ability to win
Kinda ironic that you mention this while also asking for matchmaking to be completely random in every league cause if it was, lower level players wouldn't really have a chance. So I think what you meant was matchmaking should be based on a Paragon's ability to win correct?... The entitlement lol.
You can check my previous comment. In Real life nobody is asking if you are poor, rich, white, black, small, high, fat or slim. If you are competing for something you should have similar chances (if game is fair). Of course the are details that increase or decrease your chances to win. And such detail in bg should be your roster and your skill. If we are forcing that only white people are competing with whites the game is not fair. Easy
What similar chances are you even talking about? If an UC player faces a Paragon in Bronze there are no similar chances that Paragon is getting the win no matter what and the UC player will be stuck in Bronze until they miraculously manage to get a streak with out getting matched with a single Paragon. Also, what a kind of dumb comparison is that? Races are all equal, accounts in the game are not, they'll be different depending on their progression.
Races are all equal but black guys are winning 100m sprint and white did not have a chance with them. And in my world it is ok. You know why? Because we are not equal. And I am ok with that. World does not work that way.
They did have a chance though (regardless of race), they're both at a similar level that's why they're competing against each other. You never saw an amateur sprinter compete against Usain Bolt in the Olympics correct? There's a reason for that, stop pulling out more strawman arguments it ain't helping you prove anything.
Thanks for proving my point. Amateur did not have a chance with Bolt and that is fine. But there is a chance that amateur will have a race with Bolt. And in Bg such a chance to fight against Bolt is not existing for amateur
What chance? Bolt never competed with an amateur sprinter in the Olympics lmao what are you talking about? Only thing that's been made clear so far is that you have zero common sense, and reading comprehension.
Yes bcos amateur is too week to advance to Olympics. In BG amateur can advance to GC
Comments
What chance? Bolt never competed with an amateur sprinter in the Olympics lmao what are you talking about? Only thing that's been made clear so far is that you have zero common sense, and reading comprehension.