AW & AQ rewards are underwhelming compared to BG rewards
Tinnr95
Member Posts: 70 ★
I know AW and AQ rewards just been buffed but they can’t compare with BG rewards. Players are receiving rank up materials, 3+ 6*s a season & massive amounts of sigs stones. Whereas, AW & AQ rewards are not worth the fight for. Players are now looking for BG alliances with minimal AW & AQ because it’s not worth it. Locking in your defenders and attackers whilst, officers and leaders doing placements wasting their time for a 6* nexus and rank up materials that can go from R1 > R2 if you’re below G2.
Kabam needs to look into the unbalance rewards. Maybe do the same as battlegrounds rewards in AW so we can pick our own rewards based on our progress and what we want.
As a leader of an alliance I’m very frustrated because I’m losing so many good players because of Battlegrounds.
Kabam needs to look into the unbalance rewards. Maybe do the same as battlegrounds rewards in AW so we can pick our own rewards based on our progress and what we want.
As a leader of an alliance I’m very frustrated because I’m losing so many good players because of Battlegrounds.
Post edited by Kabam Ahab on
12
Comments
I'm in G1 and it's a struggle to even play the easy AW instead of BGs. You get more from BGs per season.
BG's you have to play every day and win way more just to move up to the rewards that you're referring to. Plus, if you lose 1 match, you're losing way more than if you lose 1 war. The current alliance I'm in, has stayed in Plat 4 with not that much effort. We've won and lost and still getting plat 4 rewards.
I hate AQ with a passion but I do it because of the massive amount of T2A and T5B we get plus the little bit of gold each day.
I'm not saying don't increase rewards but for the reasons OP gave, if they're in G2 or lower, they need to try harder in war. G2 and lower doesn't need R4 mats.
Alliance war tokens sound interesting but that’s basically loyalty isn’t it? You accumulate loyalty to buy what you want