Weird interaction between Cassie and Wiccan

ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
I was playing battlegrounds and I nearly died to his incinerates. Why am I getting incinerates on me when I dex if there are no buffs being neutralized since she's buff immune is it a bug?
«1

Comments

  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
  • AverageDesiAverageDesi Member Posts: 5,260 ★★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
    edited June 2023

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place. It's dumb, especially because this is a champ designed to counter mystics who punish you for triggering buffs mainly, it makes no sense.
  • AverageDesiAverageDesi Member Posts: 5,260 ★★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place
    Here's the issue. She doesn't prevent the buff from triggering. It tries to trigger and her immunity stops it before it is placed on her. Aar stops the trigger itself from trying to trigger.


    Think of this situation. A Nick fury with 100% aar does a medium attack on a Colossus. No bleed is applied. Is it because Colossus is bleed immune or because Nick didn't have any ability accuracy to place bleed in the first place?
  • PikoluPikolu Member, Guardian Posts: 8,187 Guardian

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    That's why you don't parry wiccan if you don't have a proper counter. No parry means no neutralize so easy game easy life.
  • MaratoxMaratox Member Posts: 1,640 ★★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    It’s not dumb at all. An immunity never occurs if the effect they’re immune to was never placed on the champion at all.
  • AverageDesiAverageDesi Member Posts: 5,260 ★★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    It’s not dumb at all. An immunity never occurs if the effect they’re immune to was never placed on the champion at all.
    That's not the dumb part, the dumb part is that aar takes priority over her immunity.
  • AverageDesiAverageDesi Member Posts: 5,260 ★★★★★

    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    It’s not dumb at all. An immunity never occurs if the effect they’re immune to was never placed on the champion at all.
    That's not the dumb part, the dumb part is that aar takes priority over her immunity.
    What's your take on the nick fury -100% aar and Colossus situation? Did the bleed not apply because Colossus was immune or because Nick was unable to in the first place?
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
  • AverageDesiAverageDesi Member Posts: 5,260 ★★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    You said she was made to counter this fight. Which she isnt
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
    Pikolu said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    That's why you don't parry wiccan if you don't have a proper counter. No parry means no neutralize so easy game easy life.
    I said fights like this one which implies fights where you get punished for triggering buffs not Wiccan specifically, why are you trying to point out the obvious? She clearly doesn't work against neutralize we already know that.
  • MaratoxMaratox Member Posts: 1,640 ★★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
  • PikoluPikolu Member, Guardian Posts: 8,187 Guardian

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    I'll say this one time and one time only. If buffs didn't have a chance to trigger against Cassie period, then this line would be redundant because how can she trigger immunity if she can't trigger buffs?
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
    No I'm not lol that's just you assuming.
    What you're saying is basically: it's preventing the trigger (which still won't trigger a buff because of your immunity) from triggering. Totally makes sense.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
    Pikolu said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    I'll say this one time and one time only. If buffs didn't have a chance to trigger against Cassie period, then this line would be redundant because how can she trigger immunity if she can't trigger buffs?
    For the tenth time, yes it's preventing the trigger which still wouldn't have triggered a buff afterwards because of her immunity. Doesn't mean it isn't a dumb interaction.
  • MaratoxMaratox Member Posts: 1,640 ★★★★★

    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
    No I'm not lol that's just you assuming.
    What you're saying is basically: it's preventing the trigger (which still won't trigger a buff because of your immunity) from triggering. Totally makes sense.
    There’s a difference between a buff not applying because AAR prevented it, and a buff not applying because of an immunity. What part of that do you not get?
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
    No I'm not lol that's just you assuming.
    What you're saying is basically: it's preventing the trigger (which still won't trigger a buff because of your immunity) from triggering. Totally makes sense.
    There’s a difference between a buff not applying because AAR prevented it, and a buff not applying because of an immunity. What part of that do you not get?
    When did I ever say they were the same? Lmao all I've been saying is that the neutralize and aar taking priority over the immunity in this particular scenario is dumb. You're being punished for attempting to trigger a buff correct? There's absolutely no reason her immunity shouldn't trigger first it's dumb.
  • BitterSteelBitterSteel Member Posts: 9,264 ★★★★★
    Anly said:

    Something a champ is immune to shouldnt try to trigger in the first place.

    You’re saying this because you don’t quite understand how the game is coded.

    It would be impossible to be immune to something if there was no way to trigger it in the first place.

    The buff HAS to try to trigger in order for the game to know it has triggered. If it cannot even try and trigger, then the immunity can’t ever be triggered.

    If what you asked for happened, spider man 2099 would never be able to trigger his pause, because you’ve asked that the buff never tries to trigger, so the game has no idea that a buff tried to trigger at all - so it doesn’t know to pause his debuffs. What you asked for just destroyed the champion
  • CyborgNinja135CyborgNinja135 Member Posts: 1,120 ★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    I'll say this one time and one time only. If buffs didn't have a chance to trigger against Cassie period, then this line would be redundant because how can she trigger immunity if she can't trigger buffs?
    For the tenth time, yes it's preventing the trigger which still wouldn't have triggered a buff afterwards because of her immunity. Doesn't mean it isn't a dumb interaction.
    Copying my comment from a thread about the same issue earlier this week:

    "You're looking at it the wrong way. Neutralize taking priority over buff immunity makes sense, and it has to be this way. Why? Because AAR checks must take priority over every other check in the game.

    Let's say you have a friend that lives 2 hours away and you decide to visit them. Upon your arrival you notice that your friend isn't home and you have wasted gas and time. Your decision to visit your friend unannounced was costly. Logically, you should have called your friend before hand to make sure they would be at home.

    This is the idea behind AAR checks. Every ability check in this game has a certain computational complexity, and in most cases, it is higher than the complexity of AAR checks. While the difference might be 1 or 2 milliseconds, in a game like MCOC, or most games for that matter, there are thousands of calculations taking place every second, and operations with higher computational complexity will affect the game's performance. Therefore, it makes sense to perform AAR checks before every other ability check because it is less expensive for the program. In the few edge cases where the operation performed afterwards has the same computational complexity as the AAR check, the program just takes the hit and carries on. But on average, it will save more time and space than it loses by having AAR checks take priority over other abilities."
  • MaratoxMaratox Member Posts: 1,640 ★★★★★

    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
    No I'm not lol that's just you assuming.
    What you're saying is basically: it's preventing the trigger (which still won't trigger a buff because of your immunity) from triggering. Totally makes sense.
    There’s a difference between a buff not applying because AAR prevented it, and a buff not applying because of an immunity. What part of that do you not get?
    When did I ever say they were the same? Lmao all I've been saying is that the neutralize and aar taking priority over the immunity in this particular scenario is dumb. You're being punished for attempting to trigger a buff correct? There's absolutely no reason her immunity shouldn't trigger first it's dumb.
    But you’re completely ignoring the fact that an immunity can’t prevent something that was never applied in the first place. You just refuse to acknowledge it. It makes perfect logical sense.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★

    Pikolu said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    I'll say this one time and one time only. If buffs didn't have a chance to trigger against Cassie period, then this line would be redundant because how can she trigger immunity if she can't trigger buffs?
    For the tenth time, yes it's preventing the trigger which still wouldn't have triggered a buff afterwards because of her immunity. Doesn't mean it isn't a dumb interaction.
    Copying my comment from a thread about the same issue earlier this week:

    "You're looking at it the wrong way. Neutralize taking priority over buff immunity makes sense, and it has to be this way. Why? Because AAR checks must take priority over every other check in the game.

    Let's say you have a friend that lives 2 hours away and you decide to visit them. Upon your arrival you notice that your friend isn't home and you have wasted gas and time. Your decision to visit your friend unannounced was costly. Logically, you should have called your friend before hand to make sure they would be at home.

    This is the idea behind AAR checks. Every ability check in this game has a certain computational complexity, and in most cases, it is higher than the complexity of AAR checks. While the difference might be 1 or 2 milliseconds, in a game like MCOC, or most games for that matter, there are thousands of calculations taking place every second, and operations with higher computational complexity will affect the game's performance. Therefore, it makes sense to perform AAR checks before every other ability check because it is less expensive for the program. In the few edge cases where the operation performed afterwards has the same computational complexity as the AAR check, the program just takes the hit and carries on. But on average, it will save more time and space than it loses by having AAR checks take priority over other abilities."
    Okay now that's different, if it's more of a coding nightmare situation fair enough.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 5,443 ★★★★★
    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
    No I'm not lol that's just you assuming.
    What you're saying is basically: it's preventing the trigger (which still won't trigger a buff because of your immunity) from triggering. Totally makes sense.
    There’s a difference between a buff not applying because AAR prevented it, and a buff not applying because of an immunity. What part of that do you not get?
    When did I ever say they were the same? Lmao all I've been saying is that the neutralize and aar taking priority over the immunity in this particular scenario is dumb. You're being punished for attempting to trigger a buff correct? There's absolutely no reason her immunity shouldn't trigger first it's dumb.
    But you’re completely ignoring the fact that an immunity can’t prevent something that was never applied in the first place. You just refuse to acknowledge it. It makes perfect logical sense.
    I'm not refusing to acknowledge anything, all your counter arguments are valid, I'm just stating my opinion, immunity should trigger before aar does. Now, if it's more of a coding issue like someone else said then that's different.
  • Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
    No I'm not lol that's just you assuming.
    What you're saying is basically: it's preventing the trigger (which still won't trigger a buff because of your immunity) from triggering. Totally makes sense.
    There’s a difference between a buff not applying because AAR prevented it, and a buff not applying because of an immunity. What part of that do you not get?
    When did I ever say they were the same? Lmao all I've been saying is that the neutralize and aar taking priority over the immunity in this particular scenario is dumb. You're being punished for attempting to trigger a buff correct? There's absolutely no reason her immunity shouldn't trigger first it's dumb.
    But you’re completely ignoring the fact that an immunity can’t prevent something that was never applied in the first place. You just refuse to acknowledge it. It makes perfect logical sense.
    We get how it works, they're just pointing out that it's weird. Obviously the game is coded to check ability accuracy first, but it's just weird to punish buff immune characters for having the ability accuracy reduced on an ability that has no chance of ever happening. You can't raise the ability accuracy of gaining the buff and suddenly start gaining it, so why should reducing the ability accuracy of it punish you?

    This is just such a strange interaction that should either be changed or they should put more effort into explaining it in game. This interaction doesn't happen anywhere else in mcoc, and it's the furthest thing from self explanatory. Anyone with decent knowledge and experience would logically assume that reducing the ability accuracy of an ability that will never activate wouldn't cause a problem.
  • CyborgNinja135CyborgNinja135 Member Posts: 1,120 ★★★★

    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
    No I'm not lol that's just you assuming.
    What you're saying is basically: it's preventing the trigger (which still won't trigger a buff because of your immunity) from triggering. Totally makes sense.
    There’s a difference between a buff not applying because AAR prevented it, and a buff not applying because of an immunity. What part of that do you not get?
    When did I ever say they were the same? Lmao all I've been saying is that the neutralize and aar taking priority over the immunity in this particular scenario is dumb. You're being punished for attempting to trigger a buff correct? There's absolutely no reason her immunity shouldn't trigger first it's dumb.
    But you’re completely ignoring the fact that an immunity can’t prevent something that was never applied in the first place. You just refuse to acknowledge it. It makes perfect logical sense.
    We get how it works, they're just pointing out that it's weird. Obviously the game is coded to check ability accuracy first, but it's just weird to punish buff immune characters for having the ability accuracy reduced on an ability that has no chance of ever happening. You can't raise the ability accuracy of gaining the buff and suddenly start gaining it, so why should reducing the ability accuracy of it punish you?

    This is just such a strange interaction that should either be changed or they should put more effort into explaining it in game. This interaction doesn't happen anywhere else in mcoc, and it's the furthest thing from self explanatory. Anyone with decent knowledge and experience would logically assume that reducing the ability accuracy of an ability that will never activate wouldn't cause a problem.
    But here's the thing, the buff DOES trigger, but the immunity prevents it from applying to the champion. That is why you see the "immune" text pop up. You might not like it, but it has to work this way because the game needs a TRUE or FALSE to call the immunity, and many abilities are dependent on this. Basically, the game will check if effect == TRUE to call the immunity or any other ability that dependes on the effect being active. If the effect always has a state of FALSE then the game can't call any of the functions that depend on it.
  • BitterSteelBitterSteel Member Posts: 9,264 ★★★★★

    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Maratox said:

    Pikolu said:

    Buff immunes still get their buffs neutralized because AAR is checked before immunity is. Isn't a bug, it is a feature. Use someone immune to AAR, like AA, or has increased AA, like Longshot, to beat up wiccans. Alternatively you can use Quicksilver if there isn't a node placing buffs on you because he replaces dexterity so there is no dex buff period with him.

    I do know how to counter Wiccan and I do have QS I just had no choice there cause it was either Cassie or Jessica, my draft wasn't the best. I just think it's a bit dumb that you get the incinerates on you when you can't even trigger the thing that places those incinerates on you in the first place.
    You won't trigger incinerate with QS because he doesn't have a Dex buff to trigger at all. But buff immune champs have the ability to trigger it. It just gets prevented by immunity.

    Wiccan gets in before the trigger happens and reduces the ability accuracy to trigger it and causes the incinerate.
    I literally just said I know about QS, I just didn't draft him cause bad luck lol.

    That still doesn't make sense though, nothing is triggering, there's nothing to prevent from triggering there cause she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place.
    I didn't mention quicksilver as a counter. But to show how the mechanism works.

    There is something to trigger and prevent. Even if you take neutralize out of the conversation, Cassie tries to trigger a precision buff and her immunity prevents it . That's how immunities work.

    If you try to apply a bleed on Colossus, the bleed tries to trigger and his immunity prevents it. So there is something to trigger and something to prevent.
    she's already preventing the buffs from triggering in the first place

    Aar taking priority over an immunity in this particular situation is dumb, that's the whole point I'm trying to make here, especially for a champ whose main purpose is to counter fights like this one.
    I get what you're saying, sure it's preventing the buff before her immunity does but that's just dumb.
    You can't have the priority be one way for one fight and another for another fight. It's not even a priority question. It logically makes sense for it to be this way. Not that it's a priority either.

    Cassie was not made to counter this.if she was, she wouldn't get the incinerate
    In this case for neutralize, yes you can, and that's how it should be cause there's no buff being neutralized. It's neutralizing the trigger which won't trigger because you're immune, make it make sense.

    I said "she was designed to counter mystics that punish you for having buffs" hence the buff immunity, she obviously can't counter Wiccan which is I why made this post lol.
    Okay I’ll make it make sense very easy. You’re confused on what neutralize does. You’re thinking of it like stagger. It’s more like fate seal. It’s pretty much exactly like fate seal with two differences: the chance to prevent the buff isn’t always 100%, and neutralize doesn’t deal with buffs already on the opponent. But they do essentially the same thing: stop a buff from being applied. Your buff immunity never has to trigger if the buff never attempted to be applied in the first place.
    No I'm not lol that's just you assuming.
    What you're saying is basically: it's preventing the trigger (which still won't trigger a buff because of your immunity) from triggering. Totally makes sense.
    There’s a difference between a buff not applying because AAR prevented it, and a buff not applying because of an immunity. What part of that do you not get?
    When did I ever say they were the same? Lmao all I've been saying is that the neutralize and aar taking priority over the immunity in this particular scenario is dumb. You're being punished for attempting to trigger a buff correct? There's absolutely no reason her immunity shouldn't trigger first it's dumb.
    But you’re completely ignoring the fact that an immunity can’t prevent something that was never applied in the first place. You just refuse to acknowledge it. It makes perfect logical sense.
    We get how it works, they're just pointing out that it's weird. Obviously the game is coded to check ability accuracy first, but it's just weird to punish buff immune characters for having the ability accuracy reduced on an ability that has no chance of ever happening. You can't raise the ability accuracy of gaining the buff and suddenly start gaining it, so why should reducing the ability accuracy of it punish you?

    This is just such a strange interaction that should either be changed or they should put more effort into explaining it in game. This interaction doesn't happen anywhere else in mcoc, and it's the furthest thing from self explanatory. Anyone with decent knowledge and experience would logically assume that reducing the ability accuracy of an ability that will never activate wouldn't cause a problem.
    “You can't raise the ability accuracy of gaining the buff and suddenly start gaining it, so why should reducing the ability accuracy of it punish you?”

    That’s a bit of a false equivalency, those aren’t two opposite situations.

    Situation 1- buff immune champ can have ability accuracy of a buff reduced

    Situation 2- buff immune champ gains buff

    You’re mistaking what ability accuracy does. It’s just the chance for something to attempt to trigger. You can’t suddenly gain the buff because they’re still immune to it.

    But what you can do, is get extra ability accuracy and counteract neutralise. So if you grab a team of Quake 3,4 and 5* and a Hawkeye, that increases the ability accuracy of all champions, and it means that you can now have an extra 28% ability accuracy. So you now have a 128% chance to trigger the dexterity buff

    Rintrah tries to reduce it by 100%, leaving you with a 28% chance to attempt to gain the buff, and still pause your debuffs.


    I know you probably weren’t talking about this, and it might be an off hand comment about suddenly gaining the buff. But that seems a little in bad faith for this topic, because the game does actually already account for raising the ability accuracy of the buff.



    “they should put more effort into explaining it in game”

    I disagree. There are too many interactions in the game to completely cover all of them. And there is something lost by hand holding players through everything and pointing out things without pushing them to learn and test

    If someone is confused they can come to the forum or line chats and ask, and then it can be explained to them.
  • AnlyAnly Member Posts: 615 ★★

    Anly said:

    Something a champ is immune to shouldnt try to trigger in the first place.

    You’re saying this because you don’t quite understand how the game is coded.

    It would be impossible to be immune to something if there was no way to trigger it in the first place.

    The buff HAS to try to trigger in order for the game to know it has triggered. If it cannot even try and trigger, then the immunity can’t ever be triggered.

    If what you asked for happened, spider man 2099 would never be able to trigger his pause, because you’ve asked that the buff never tries to trigger, so the game has no idea that a buff tried to trigger at all - so it doesn’t know to pause his debuffs. What you asked for just destroyed the champion
    You cant trigger something that's already triggered, this would make sense if they were only immune sometimes, colossus is immune to bleed all the time, his immunity is triggered all the time it cannot be re-triggered, how can something try to trigger if it is impossible for that thing to trigger in the first place?
Sign In or Register to comment.