“The realm event pace is slowing down, we won’t reach the 1 billion mileston”

2»

Comments

  • BlackTuranBlackTuran Member Posts: 1,022 ★★★★
    @DNA3000 what do you think
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 5,218 ★★★★★
    Zolobacsi said:

    We are slowing down as more and more reaching GC. Scoring wins there is not as easy as in VT, a loss only gives 5 points more than in VT, and players trying to finish higher in GC are not necessarily playing to keep their scores.

    Its the same wether you win or lose, the points for Realm event are the same, people just don't play as much after reaching GC
  • FrostGiantLordFrostGiantLord Member Posts: 2,063 ★★★★
    Even if somehow we don't get enough points to reach the 1 billion milestone, I'm confident the Stark Foundation will find some way to bail us out. In Stark We Trust!
  • MidnightfoxMidnightfox Member Posts: 1,285 ★★★
    I think what those slowing seem to forget is there is half a titan if we hit 1.5 billion.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 5,218 ★★★★★

    I think what those slowing seem to forget is there is half a titan if we hit 1.5 billion.

    Those are people who realized we will barely hit 1B...
  • GamerGamer Member Posts: 10,897 ★★★★★

    I think what those slowing seem to forget is there is half a titan if we hit 1.5 billion.

    i never expected the 1.5b 1b seems the best the offer was just more in case we hit it

  • Ceti_EelCeti_Eel Member Posts: 114
    Yeah I’m doubting that the stark foundation will top up to from 1 to 1.5 billion, so those milestones are likely not happening
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,375 ★★★★★
    edited October 21
    Danxor said:

    My issue is this is by far the worst GC meta and its just absolutely miserable to play because its so RNG heavy on if AI will let you have intercepts to do anything, its just a lesson in frustration and being miserable. If they are going to do an event that requires playing a **** ton they have to pick metas that are not awful.

    This was a player voted meta… it’s actually one of the best mixes of strategy and skill. Sadly the AI has ruined it for all though. I can definitely say its killed my motivation to play as much as I might have
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,375 ★★★★★

    I think what those slowing seem to forget is there is half a titan if we hit 1.5 billion.

    Those are people who realized we will barely hit 1B...
    Yeah without Stark I doubt even 1 billion was gonna happen.
  • BlackTuranBlackTuran Member Posts: 1,022 ★★★★
    BigBlueOx said:

    I think what those slowing seem to forget is there is half a titan if we hit 1.5 billion.

    Those are people who realized we will barely hit 1B...
    Yeah without Stark I doubt even 1 billion was gonna happen.
    Yeah without the 1st Stark donation we wouldn’t have made it to the billion but the way things stand, we’re definitely on pace to get it
  • SiliyoSiliyo Member Posts: 1,471 ★★★★★

    Danxor said:

    My issue is this is by far the worst GC meta and its just absolutely miserable to play because its so RNG heavy on if AI will let you have intercepts to do anything, its just a lesson in frustration and being miserable. If they are going to do an event that requires playing a **** ton they have to pick metas that are not awful.

    This was the meta that was voted by the summoners so I guess the majority of the summoners are to blame for this meta.
    The caveat? It was voted by Summoner’s in the MCOC Discord, which isn’t the majority. They should incorporate votes from all platforms for it to feel like a “majority” did vote but 🤷🏻‍♂️
  • MethodMan69MethodMan69 Member Posts: 398 ★★★

    Danxor said:

    My issue is this is by far the worst GC meta and its just absolutely miserable to play because its so RNG heavy on if AI will let you have intercepts to do anything, its just a lesson in frustration and being miserable. If they are going to do an event that requires playing a **** ton they have to pick metas that are not awful.

    This was the meta that was voted by the summoners so I guess the majority of the summoners are to blame for this meta.
    They couldn't predict that the state of AI would make the game so awful to play , they just went with a fun meta from last year .
  • DrZolaDrZola Member Posts: 9,126 ★★★★★

    Danxor said:

    My issue is this is by far the worst GC meta and its just absolutely miserable to play because its so RNG heavy on if AI will let you have intercepts to do anything, its just a lesson in frustration and being miserable. If they are going to do an event that requires playing a **** ton they have to pick metas that are not awful.

    This was the meta that was voted by the summoners so I guess the majority of the summoners are to blame for this meta.
    They couldn't predict that the state of AI would make the game so awful to play , they just went with a fun meta from last year .
    AI remains bad for me. Backdraft parries galore and weird passivity. Not much fun.

    Dr. Zola
  • CROSSHAIRSCROSSHAIRS Member Posts: 398
    "Gotta Earn em' all"
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 5,178 ★★★★★
    I enjoyed the meta, I enjoy most metas with the exception of stupid xmagica saga.
    Next power gain meta is sp3 galore meta.
    It doesn't look like I will enjoy it.
    But even if I won't enjoy it, I am pretty damn sure I'm gonna enjoy reading rant threads and people raging in streams.
Sign In or Register to comment.