KyrieRed wrote: » why King Groot can inflict poison with his l2 coming out of his mouth yet he's not poison immune. Kabam logic
Hulksmasshh wrote: » Balance. How many situations out there do you get hit with incinerate anyway lol
WinterSpider112 wrote: » Every champ takes damage from incineration
Maximus_Spankerson wrote: » @Kabam Miike, to generalize this statement, whenever Kabam introduces a new debuff, a step must be taken to review existing champions and how they should interact with that debuff. So many champions were released when bleed and poison were the only damage over time debuffs in the game. Since then, you added shock, incinerate, coldsnap, degen, etc. This is a Marvel superhero game, and, as such, champion abilities is a very important factor. I can't imagine it being difficult to review a roster of 100 champions and mark those who should be immune / resistant to a new damage over time debuff.. Indeed, having a champion with a flaming skull take incinerate damage, character made of electricity take shock damage isn't very well thought out.
eXtripa69 wrote: » Incinerate was in the game, but incinerate immunity not
Titan_A97 wrote: » There was a another thread on this less than 2 days ago but oh well, I'll repost my answer here as well: (Originally posted October 14)Ghost Rider's 'fire' isn't just a conventional fire where you light a match or turn on a stove; it's a mystical type of fire called 'Hellfire' that 'burns' the victim according to their sins (the intensity of the 'burn' depends on the severity of the sins, that's why GR has an extra % to place a judgement on a villain opponent, because of their sinful ways). This is why he's not immune to incinerate; it follows the comic book lore. If you need further clarification then Google 'ghost rider hellfire' and your questions wil be answered there.
mutamatt wrote: » hes not immune to incinerate bc incinerate immunity wasnt a thing when he was released