Lol. Not to make this about Joe so I'll drop it after this, but poison immune, good stun on sp2, and sp1 is good with deep wounds plus he follows me around like the plague, can't shake that guy!
Lol. Not to make this about Joe so I'll drop it after this, but poison immune, good stun on sp2, and sp1 is good with deep wounds plus he follows me around like the plague, can't shake that guy!
Lol. My last 4* Crystal. Already have him Duped. It's how they roll. I've had no issues with him since pre-WP Nerf. His Bleed from the L3 always cut through.
Eh, I find him pretty useless, but whatever. His Stun only lets you do one combo or heavy like Parry would, and his Bleed on SP1 is inconsistent. His SP3 Bleed looks awesome, but his SP3 is purposely bad and the Bleed does the whole SP3 damage again. So his SP3 is average as a whole. Anyway, he crystal is fine as is, let's not whine about it.
Adding champs which have no value to the game and don't seem to have any marketing tie ins requiring them to be added just seems like a very bizarre approach to me. I can't quite figure it.
They aren't being added to the game, they already exists. They are being added to the 5* crystals.
And they are all being added over time because asking the players pretty please which ones should they add is a game development strategy basically no one follows.
Also, the notion that the vocal player chatter is always correct on champion value is dubious to me at best. Magik for example was generally spoken of as a great defender but subpar attacker by most people. Only a small minority of players (I kept track, because I was one of them) promoted her as a great attacker until Daves event, whereupon suddenly everyone seemed to be extolling the virtues of power control. Dormammu was considered similarly when he first came out until people figured out how to leverage his power control optimally.
The vocal chatter says everyone thinks Doctor Strange is worthless and not worth using (the arena scores disprove that). There were people not that long ago who claimed using anything besides 5* or 4* Starlord in LoL was ridiculous, but I've heard it done with like maybe dozen different primary attackers, including Yellowjacket which was mentioned in the thread.
I find the player chatter about the value of champions to be interesting and useful, but also hyperbolic and distorted. It is not always right. I believe no champion has no value, and there is significant disagreement over many aspects of who is more or less valuable. Things only seem bizarre when you believe your evaluation of the value of things is obvious and universal.
Comments
I guess he is pretty good at racking up kills for the other team's defenders in AW.
Lol. My last 4* Crystal. Already have him Duped. It's how they roll. I've had no issues with him since pre-WP Nerf. His Bleed from the L3 always cut through.
They aren't being added to the game, they already exists. They are being added to the 5* crystals.
And they are all being added over time because asking the players pretty please which ones should they add is a game development strategy basically no one follows.
Also, the notion that the vocal player chatter is always correct on champion value is dubious to me at best. Magik for example was generally spoken of as a great defender but subpar attacker by most people. Only a small minority of players (I kept track, because I was one of them) promoted her as a great attacker until Daves event, whereupon suddenly everyone seemed to be extolling the virtues of power control. Dormammu was considered similarly when he first came out until people figured out how to leverage his power control optimally.
The vocal chatter says everyone thinks Doctor Strange is worthless and not worth using (the arena scores disprove that). There were people not that long ago who claimed using anything besides 5* or 4* Starlord in LoL was ridiculous, but I've heard it done with like maybe dozen different primary attackers, including Yellowjacket which was mentioned in the thread.
I find the player chatter about the value of champions to be interesting and useful, but also hyperbolic and distorted. It is not always right. I believe no champion has no value, and there is significant disagreement over many aspects of who is more or less valuable. Things only seem bizarre when you believe your evaluation of the value of things is obvious and universal.