5* Punisher issue not addressed

My previous thread was closed stating it had already been addressed. This is not correct. The original thread's issue was not addressed. Stating that 5* Punisher has a low drop rate is not an answer. The community wants to know if the 5* version was even in the uncollected crystal prior to maintenance. Please give us a real answer. More threads will be created until we the community receive a real answer. Either yes or no.
«1

Comments

  • Deadbyrd9Deadbyrd9 Posts: 3,460 ★★★★
    Oh look another post that will be closed
  • Mcord11758Mcord11758 Posts: 1,257 ★★★★
    Amazing
  • TKalTKal Posts: 534 ★★
    We won't let this wash away, you should understand
  • I was waiting for this one ...
    I guess it will take a while to understand that the issue wasn't addressed anywhere and that we still are waiting for answers
  • TKalTKal Posts: 534 ★★
    eXtripa69 wrote: »
    I was waiting for this one ...
    I guess it will take a while to understand that the issue wasn't addressed anywhere and that we still are waiting for answers

    They perfectly know that, they just don't want to give a real answer
  • The one that remains, and closed of course, got scrubbed first, wonder why.
    And why can't they see that repeatedly stating its been answered makes them look worse? Kabam we know you're smart enough to know what the issue is, what we are actually asking, so when you say it's been answered we know you are lying! Or very very dumb, so which is it?
  • TKalTKal Posts: 534 ★★
    They just keep saying that he is really rare, but there are people who had a crystal land on him, and they just got an error message. No Punisher. They refuse to respond on this or something.

    It is confirmed that he is in here now, many people got him.

    But it wasn't the case before the maintenance, and that's why we want to know if he was before. We still don't know that

  • And it's not fair to keep closing threads either until the issue is addressed, we're on a different topic here, one that has NOT been answered, one we patiently waited for 9 days for an answer originally and never got.

    Were the 70 pulls confirmed as actually recieving a 5*, and not a falsely reported 4*??
  • Draco2199Draco2199 Posts: 803 ★★★
    Official answer it doesn't matter hes in now and you wont get compensation so oh well. Move on.
  • Draco2199 wrote: »
    Official answer it doesn't matter hes in now and you wont get compensation so oh well. Move on.

    , no?
  • Leiva_darkLeiva_dark Posts: 320 ★★
    edited September 2017
    exact the issue is if it was before the maintenance because it was not able to prove since there is no evidence and we need answers !!! do not respond if it is rare or not to get that already known and is not what the community is looking for.
  • He thanked us for raising a concern in that awesome response, and here we are raising a concern again, where's the gratitude?
  • It's both- 70 pulls in first couple of hours, but the proof is rare...
  • In there interest of good business practice the consumer expects an answer to valid questions. If you have invested money into this game at any point you would want to make sure you are not taken for a sucker.

    This community has had enough. We want Kabam to take responsibility and to treat us with respect.
  • @Seatin is going to light them up, and all this will be almost worth it. The "official response" is more than enough material by itself.
This discussion has been closed.