**BANQUET EVENT PSA**
To fully participate in the upcoming Banquet's Alliance Event you will need to be in your alliance for 14 days prior to the event's start date on December 20th. That means, stay in your alliance from December 6th onwards to enjoy all there is to offer in the Banquet event.
To fully participate in the upcoming Banquet's Alliance Event you will need to be in your alliance for 14 days prior to the event's start date on December 20th. That means, stay in your alliance from December 6th onwards to enjoy all there is to offer in the Banquet event.
**Not Another Anime Reference Solo Event Returning**
This solo event has been fixed and will appear in game again on December 10th and will run through the 17th.
Reminder: This event is available to Paragon+ Summoners
This solo event has been fixed and will appear in game again on December 10th and will run through the 17th.
Reminder: This event is available to Paragon+ Summoners
Comments
When you face Black Widow, the timer can be removed too.
However if he has fate seal when he’s about to form his ice armour instead of forming it if the fate seal is still in her,it will remove the timer and then the iceman will need to use the l3 to get it back
The node that makes him fight agressive makes it hard
I'm sorry. It sounds like you're saying Mephisto is unfair to Iceman. Mephisto, who's unique damage ability is an incineration aura, is unfair to the champion who is immune to incinerate and can attack him with relative impunity.
I'm sure I must have misread that somehow.
Hmm...Iceman ignoring ONE of his features, still leaving him with the power gain from the aura, the regen from souls, soul imprisonment, and the features of his S2 and 3...so Mephisto is still left with the majority of his capability, while ALL of Iceman's get shut down.....Yes, Mephisto is unfaire to Iceman.
Iceman is indeed ignoring just one of his features but it is the most important one. Without the passive procing incinerate that can trigger at any time and the incineration aura that triggers when he uses special two, Mephisto is just not that dangerous of a boss.
Plus, you claim Mephisto gets to keep the "features" of his special two and special three attacks, but the special features of the special two and special three attack are incineration auras. You know, the very thing Iceman is immune to. Meanwhile, Iceman also gets to keep his special features of special three attacks. Which is to reform Ice armor.
So not only are you trivializing the most important advantage Iceman has over Mephisto - I repeat, the reason why players recommend using Iceman - you are also miscounting the ledger between Mephisto and Iceman. Mephisto doesn't get to "keep" the special features of S2 and S3 because both of those trigger incineration auras (S2 temporarily, S3 permanently). Those two effects are worthless against Iceman. Meanwhile if we are counting special attack features, Iceman still keeps reforming Ice Armor, so by your own counting scheme Mephisto doesn't shut down all of Iceman's features.
But separate from all of that, Mephisto cannot be unfair to Iceman when Iceman has the advantage over Mephisto. That twists the definition of "unfair" into a pretzel.
Yup and look how carnage i mean carbage turned out to be lmao