Has their ever been a Champion that got a nerf

MaxGamingMaxGaming Member Posts: 3,211 ★★★★★
in General Discussion
This counts as a NERF not a buff that people call a nerf i don't have great of memory so I dont remember
«1

Comments

  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Member Posts: 14,109 ★★★★★
    Apart from bug fixes and other stuff that player's mistakenly call "nerf", yes there has been a couple of nerfs in the past.
    Mostly were done on patch 12.0
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Mrspider568Mrspider568 Member Posts: 2,007 ★★★
    The infamous guillotine 2099 synergy change
  • Thunderstruck77Thunderstruck77 Member Posts: 78 ★
    Sorry... Dr. Strange and Thor take the cake. Sad days...
  • SpideyFunkoSpideyFunko Member Posts: 21,960 ★★★★★
    Steel_Ball_Run said:

    The 12.0 Extinction Event

    yes... yes
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,431 ★★★★★
    MikeyBoi69 said:

    Drax
    AA

    Those weren't nerfs.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,431 ★★★★★
    The true nerfs were 12.0. After that, there weren't any. You could technically call Namors regen a nerf but really the only true thing that matters on Namors is his reflection damage.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • GreekhitGreekhit Member Posts: 2,820 ★★★★★
    Demonzfyre said:

    The true nerfs were 12.0. After that, there weren't any. You could technically call Namors regen a nerf but really the only true thing that matters on Namors is his reflection damage.

    Namor, She Hulk, Morningstar, BWCV and others disagree with that.
    Champs like SH and MS were working like this for years.
    How would you call a change on a champ, that decreases his performance, no matter if it wasn’t “intended” to work like that or not?
    Cause there is only one word describe it precisely and it is NERF.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • ItsDamienItsDamien Member Posts: 5,626 ★★★★★
    Greekhit said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    The true nerfs were 12.0. After that, there weren't any. You could technically call Namors regen a nerf but really the only true thing that matters on Namors is his reflection damage.

    Namor, She Hulk, Morningstar, BWCV and others disagree with that.
    Champs like SH and MS were working like this for years.
    How would you call a change on a champ, that decreases his performance, no matter if it wasn’t “intended” to work like that or not?
    Cause there is only one word describe it precisely and it is NERF.
    If something isn't intended to work in a way, then you can't call it a nerf. That's literally a fix. There's a massive difference between the two, trust me, I spent almost a decade working in the Games Industry having to define the difference between these two things.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • ItsDamienItsDamien Member Posts: 5,626 ★★★★★
    HI_guys said:

    ItsDamien said:

    Greekhit said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    The true nerfs were 12.0. After that, there weren't any. You could technically call Namors regen a nerf but really the only true thing that matters on Namors is his reflection damage.

    Namor, She Hulk, Morningstar, BWCV and others disagree with that.
    Champs like SH and MS were working like this for years.
    How would you call a change on a champ, that decreases his performance, no matter if it wasn’t “intended” to work like that or not?
    Cause there is only one word describe it precisely and it is NERF.
    If something isn't intended to work in a way, then you can't call it a nerf. That's literally a fix. There's a massive difference between the two, trust me, I spent almost a decade working in the Games Industry having to define the difference between these two things.
    A decade in gaming industry and can't tell the difference between asking a question and complaining
    A decade in the gaming industry to tell you that you need to learn not to complain and say that you're not like some absolute child. Go back to school.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • ItsDamienItsDamien Member Posts: 5,626 ★★★★★
    HI_guys said:

    ItsDamien said:

    HI_guys said:

    ItsDamien said:

    Greekhit said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    The true nerfs were 12.0. After that, there weren't any. You could technically call Namors regen a nerf but really the only true thing that matters on Namors is his reflection damage.

    Namor, She Hulk, Morningstar, BWCV and others disagree with that.
    Champs like SH and MS were working like this for years.
    How would you call a change on a champ, that decreases his performance, no matter if it wasn’t “intended” to work like that or not?
    Cause there is only one word describe it precisely and it is NERF.
    If something isn't intended to work in a way, then you can't call it a nerf. That's literally a fix. There's a massive difference between the two, trust me, I spent almost a decade working in the Games Industry having to define the difference between these two things.
    A decade in gaming industry and can't tell the difference between asking a question and complaining
    A decade in the gaming industry to tell you that you need to learn not to complain and say that you're not like some absolute child. Go back to school.
    I wish. College sucks
    Clearly, because they still haven't taught you the difference.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • GreekhitGreekhit Member Posts: 2,820 ★★★★★
    ItsDamien said:

    Greekhit said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    The true nerfs were 12.0. After that, there weren't any. You could technically call Namors regen a nerf but really the only true thing that matters on Namors is his reflection damage.

    Namor, She Hulk, Morningstar, BWCV and others disagree with that.
    Champs like SH and MS were working like this for years.
    How would you call a change on a champ, that decreases his performance, no matter if it wasn’t “intended” to work like that or not?
    Cause there is only one word describe it precisely and it is NERF.
    If something isn't intended to work in a way, then you can't call it a nerf. That's literally a fix. There's a massive difference between the two, trust me, I spent almost a decade working in the Games Industry having to define the difference between these two things.
    I don’t disagree with that, but a fix can be a nerf also, since it reduces the champion’s performance. One thing doesn’t cancel another.
    She hulk could chain her heavy since her release. It wasn’t a secret and Kabam probably was aware of that for years. The truth is that they change it, because she was destroying 6.2 Champion. She still does, but not with the comfort she could pre change.
    Also truth is that the 6.2 Champion was the cause of many champion “fixes”.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Mr_PlatypusMr_Platypus Member Posts: 2,779 ★★★★★
    edited December 2020
    Depends on your definition of nerf.
    But the indisputable ones include
    Star lord
    Scarlet witch
    Dr strange
    Rocket technically got nerfed when they switched from percentages to numerical values as he lost his ability to reach 100% crit rate, though that change affected a few champs in different ways.
    And the forgotten victim of 12.0... magneto
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.