Please note that when we enable the 1 Loyalty Cost for Revives in Alliance Wars for Season 34, they will not be visible from the screen that appears when you choose to Revive or Heal a Champion from the Fight Screen.

You will be able to purchase Revives from the Loyalty tab in the Store Menu.

Introducing your first Experience with 6-Star Champions: The Boss Rush Challenge! [UPDATED Oct 17]

1…6791112…20

Comments

  • Sw6bluezSw6bluez Posts: 18
    Will there be a title to go with this challenge?
  • AlejandrocastreAlejandrocastre Posts: 1
    Ojalá hagan más sencillo el obtener más catas de clase, y sobre todo suelten más oro e ISO en cristales
  • StL_SuitsStL_Suits Posts: 69
    CapWW2 wrote: »
    Skimbobbor wrote: »
    Can we please make a challenge that people who arent extremely strong can beat and get rewards? i get you want to challenge top players but this is just demoralising for anyone without a team of really good 4 stars at like max level.

    Stop complaining mate. The quest is what it is. Some players are weaker than others, guess what? Welcome to real life. I can do that challenge with 3 stars.

    Bwahahaha, and how many Odin's Vaults?
  • RaganatorRaganator Posts: 2,268 ★★★★★
    Dear Kabam,

    Initially I was not all that in to this quest, and would just run through it in passing. However, seeing the amount of people who complain that they won't be able to complete the quest and how it "just isn't fair" - please continue putting out similar content purely for forum entertainment value.

    Thanks. And feel free to Flag this post - I get a kick out of it.
  • DeathBringer77DeathBringer77 Posts: 159
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    DeathBringer77 wrote: »
    This isn't true Miike. A 5* rank one is 80 challenger rating and a 4* rank 4 is 90. Not the same bro.

    When I tried to edit my post it went into moderator limbo and I thought it was important enough to amplify. You are correct and @Kabam Miike is incorrect: 5* rank 1 is identical to 4* rank 3, just like 4* rank 1 is equal to 3* rank 3. The logical progression should be for 6* rank 1 to be equal to 5* rank 3, or CR 100.

    Miike, we need an answer on this please
  • KpatrixKpatrix Posts: 1,049 ★★★
    edited October 2017
    I really hope Miike is wrong about this, because if he is correct, a R1 6* with just iso used to level up will be as strong as the strongest champions currently in the game without using any T4 cats, class or basic, or any T2A.
    That's concerning, what will it take to bring a 6* to R2 where they will be as strong as a R5 5* ? And pushing champs that scale like this, then for sure 4*s will become obsolete, as a rank 1 level 1 6* will be as strong as a 5/50 4*.
  • KpatrixKpatrix Posts: 1,049 ★★★
    When you first introduced 5* champs, you told us a 3/45 5* would be slightly stronger than a 5/50 4*. Can you make the same comparison with the 6*s ? I'm really curious if the actual strength of the champs goes along with the CR, or if the CR is just jacked up for 6*s to make them feel much stronger than what their stats say.
  • RagamugginGunnerRagamugginGunner Posts: 2,210 ★★★★★
    Kabam Miike wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    DeathBringer77 wrote: »
    This isn't true Miike. A 5* rank one is 80 challenger rating and a 4* rank 4 is 90. Not the same bro.

    When I tried to edit my post it went into moderator limbo and I thought it was important enough to amplify. You are correct and @Kabam Miike is incorrect: 5* rank 1 is identical to 4* rank 3, just like 4* rank 1 is equal to 3* rank 3. The logical progression should be for 6* rank 1 to be equal to 5* rank 3, or CR 100.

    Yep. Looks like I read my chart wrong. Thank you for pointing that out! The Challenge Rating for 6-Stars is still correct though.

    This is just terrible.
  • KpatrixKpatrix Posts: 1,049 ★★★
    DeathBringer77 wrote: »
    Wow. That's the response. So 5* will be obsolete very soon. What a bunch of ****.

    I'm hoping it's just the CR that is jacked up, but the rest still scales, so a 4* 4/40~5* 2/35~6* 1/25

    If the base stats scale any higher than that then anything t4's are needed on are obsolete
  • TheMaskTheMask Posts: 104 ★
    Kabam Miike wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    DeathBringer77 wrote: »
    This isn't true Miike. A 5* rank one is 80 challenger rating and a 4* rank 4 is 90. Not the same bro.

    When I tried to edit my post it went into moderator limbo and I thought it was important enough to amplify. You are correct and @Kabam Miike is incorrect: 5* rank 1 is identical to 4* rank 3, just like 4* rank 1 is equal to 3* rank 3. The logical progression should be for 6* rank 1 to be equal to 5* rank 3, or CR 100.

    Yep. Looks like I read my chart wrong. Thank you for pointing that out! The Challenge Rating for 6-Stars is still correct though.

    @Kabam Miike , please reconsider this, challenger rating of 6 star rank 1 equal to 5 star rank 4 is just soo wrong

    Listen to the community kabam.....
  • TheMaskTheMask Posts: 104 ★
    U should be offering us 5* for doing such a disaster in challenger rating and you offer us a 4* who will get torn down to shreds like 2*
  • GreywardenGreywarden Posts: 843 ★★★★
    Kabam Miike wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    DeathBringer77 wrote: »
    This isn't true Miike. A 5* rank one is 80 challenger rating and a 4* rank 4 is 90. Not the same bro.

    When I tried to edit my post it went into moderator limbo and I thought it was important enough to amplify. You are correct and @Kabam Miike is incorrect: 5* rank 1 is identical to 4* rank 3, just like 4* rank 1 is equal to 3* rank 3. The logical progression should be for 6* rank 1 to be equal to 5* rank 3, or CR 100.

    Yep. Looks like I read my chart wrong. Thank you for pointing that out! The Challenge Rating for 6-Stars is still correct though.

    Whoa - so then 6* are NOT following the current progression on CR.

    Why would a 5* rank 1 be equal to a 4* rank 3 but a 6* rank 1 is equal to a 5* rank 4?
  • JRock808JRock808 Posts: 1,149 ★★★★
    A big fat LOL is all I have left. Just LOL.
  • LocoMotivesLocoMotives Posts: 1,200 ★★★
    @Iksdjvan a Hyp without sp3 is no challenge at all. It would just be evading specials and then attacking before he recovers.
  • RaganatorRaganator Posts: 2,268 ★★★★★
    Iksdjvan wrote: »
    I won't be touching this quest.

    Could have been a full stop there.

  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Posts: 7,711 ★★★★★
    Kabam Miike wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    DeathBringer77 wrote: »
    This isn't true Miike. A 5* rank one is 80 challenger rating and a 4* rank 4 is 90. Not the same bro.

    When I tried to edit my post it went into moderator limbo and I thought it was important enough to amplify. You are correct and @Kabam Miike is incorrect: 5* rank 1 is identical to 4* rank 3, just like 4* rank 1 is equal to 3* rank 3. The logical progression should be for 6* rank 1 to be equal to 5* rank 3, or CR 100.

    Yep. Looks like I read my chart wrong. Thank you for pointing that out! The Challenge Rating for 6-Stars is still correct though.

    Um...so you are confirming that 6*s are out of line with the challenger rating progression of rest of the game and that's it? No justification? That makes no sense. It sounds like there is a mistake somewhere. Some follow up would be helpful.
  • Viper1987Viper1987 Posts: 728 ★★★
    Kabam Miike wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    DeathBringer77 wrote: »
    This isn't true Miike. A 5* rank one is 80 challenger rating and a 4* rank 4 is 90. Not the same bro.

    When I tried to edit my post it went into moderator limbo and I thought it was important enough to amplify. You are correct and @Kabam Miike is incorrect: 5* rank 1 is identical to 4* rank 3, just like 4* rank 1 is equal to 3* rank 3. The logical progression should be for 6* rank 1 to be equal to 5* rank 3, or CR 100.

    Yep. Looks like I read my chart wrong. Thank you for pointing that out! The Challenge Rating for 6-Stars is still correct though.

    Can you please explain the reasoning behind this? Are you intentionally trying to only make 6* viable upon release? Why is it not following the logical CR progression?
  • Etaki_LirakoiEtaki_Lirakoi Posts: 480 ★★
    edited October 2017
    GroundedWisdom wrote: »
    LeNoirFaineant wrote: »
    Kabam Miike wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    DeathBringer77 wrote: »
    This isn't true Miike. A 5* rank one is 80 challenger rating and a 4* rank 4 is 90. Not the same bro.

    When I tried to edit my post it went into moderator limbo and I thought it was important enough to amplify. You are correct and @Kabam Miike is incorrect: 5* rank 1 is identical to 4* rank 3, just like 4* rank 1 is equal to 3* rank 3. The logical progression should be for 6* rank 1 to be equal to 5* rank 3, or CR 100.

    Yep. Looks like I read my chart wrong. Thank you for pointing that out! The Challenge Rating for 6-Stars is still correct though.

    Um...so you are confirming that 6*s are out of line with the challenger rating progression of rest of the game and that's it? No justification? That makes no sense. It sounds like there is a mistake somewhere. Some follow up would be helpful.

    Well, if I had to venture a guess, I'd say it's so that the progression is not as extreme. Presumably they will have Base Stats that are higher than 5*s. Which is fair considering one of the biggest concerns was using existing Champs and how they might become obsolete.
    What? That’s exactly what they’re doing, the challenger rating is higher than it should be, more than if it followed a steady progression.
Sign In or Register to comment.