How about summoners get a six month trial run with champs? Lol

Skydad23Skydad23 Posts: 252 ★★★
edited February 1 in General Discussion
Kabam is the professional company that gets to test these champs before they release them and now they’re giving themselves a loophole to Nerf there champions six months down the road after they created them and tested them. Kabam is the professional company if they get a Mulligan shouldn’t the summoners who spent time money and resources get mulligans on champs also? I think it would only be fair for us to get a six month run on new champs we put resources in and if we don’t like the way it’s going to be able to get those resources back? You can’t honestly expect anyone to invest in New champ calve crystals or new champ bundles if there’s a chance that those champs get changed in six months without us getting some kind of compensation back.
Post edited by Kabam Miike on

Comments

  • winterthurwinterthur Posts: 6,832 ★★★★★
    I have to check dictionary to understand a specific word in your message. Learnt something new. :)

    What do you suggest to be given back by Summoners' if the re-balancing result is the champ getting better?
  • booscka2536booscka2536 Posts: 2,022 ★★★
    if i was to guess id say we will get a 3* of each new champ they are doing it alot of times anyway . maybe even a 4* with the new system .
  • CaptainGameCaptainGame Posts: 350 ★★★
    winterthur said:

    I have to check dictionary to understand a specific word in your message. Learnt something new. :)

    What do you suggest to be given back by Summoners' if the re-balancing result is the champ getting better?

    In what business are you in where the customers have to pay a business back when the business makes changes after purchase?
  • BigManOnCampusBigManOnCampus Posts: 334 ★★★
    CaptainGame said:

    winterthur said:

    I have to check dictionary to understand a specific word in your message. Learnt something new. :)

    What do you suggest to be given back by Summoners' if the re-balancing result is the champ getting better?

    In what business are you in where the customers have to pay a business back when the business makes changes after purchase?
    Rental lease with option to buy , many companies do that .
  • KerneasKerneas Posts: 3,118 ★★★★★
    6 months is long, but getting the new champs for 2 weeks each (so that it adds to the month) is sth I fully support
  • winterthurwinterthur Posts: 6,832 ★★★★★
    Skydad23 said:

    winterthur said:

    I have to check dictionary to understand a specific word in your message. Learnt something new. :)

    What do you suggest to be given back by Summoners' if the re-balancing result is the champ getting better?

    And if they happen to rebalance the champion for the better nobody would need anything back but if they’re having to balance them for the better I doubt many summoners were investing a lot of resources into ranking them up if they were not very good.

    I’m sure they make a lot of money on people mine the new champion featured cavalier crystals in the new feature bundles why would anyone dump a lot of money on those figuring they are risky odds anyway especially if they’re going after a very strong champion that could possibly be re-balanced and toned down
    It is difficult to label a general term "better". Did Hood became better after the rework? Perhaps for the majority (and still did not rank him up after) but not for those who ranked them up for a specific attribute Hood had before the reworked.

    Was Falcon good before the reworked? and I have seen account with Falcon as their top champ way before the buff program was on.

    I don't know why would anyone dump 9k cash on a gifting event but there are. If the Summoner is end-game, and have lots of resources, chasing prestige, does it matter if the new champ is a dud?

    https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/144305/how-dare-you-give-namor-a-higher-prestige-than-goldpool
  • Kabam MiikeKabam Miike Posts: 7,390
    Please use the designated sticky thread for discussion of this subject.
This discussion has been closed.