**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Battle Ground is too P2W
IonGaming
Posts: 34 ★
Battle Ground is too P2W, they need to be able to sort out the matches by total Prestige or your Profile Prestige or the matches will be way to unfair, here’s one match that I played 
and here’s his pfp
You can’t tell me that P2W is going to lose to a F2P, you can even be a person that spends like 10 dollars and you’ll still lose to people who spend a lot
and here’s his pfpYou can’t tell me that P2W is going to lose to a F2P, you can even be a person that spends like 10 dollars and you’ll still lose to people who spend a lot
9
Comments
or you know maybe this guy also isn’t as good as his roster would suggest
F2P can beat “P2W”. It’s very possible
I’ve won matches against people with full decks of R3s when I don’t even have a full deck of R5s. It depends a lot on skill and strategy
the match making is obviously not taking a lot into consideration but im sure that can be updated as things progress, like theyve said its still technically beta. terminology doesnt apply here but the actual issue of bad matchmaking makes sense
Soon we'll see similar division that we see in AW & AQ
Spenders will be at the top in Masters with some F2P in Platinums, & most F2Ps in Golds
Other than that I think we'll also see a division between grinders & non-grinders in BGs but that probably won't be as apparent
Anyway we do not yet know how this will be structured in terms of competition, whether there will be tiers a la Incursions, etc.
I’ve lost to accounts much lower than mine because my ranked champs are not great for the global node, and some people just had better defensive strategy.
Plus I’m running suicides and the parry bug still sucks. But point is, it’s not just about the roster. BG has a huge strategy aspect to it.
Or (even more likely!) Have a "bro" in his "top" alliance, that, (according to kabam) all we f2p players need to bottom feed off of to get three rank 4 six stars for the new title???
But ya can't buy it huh?
Sorry buds! But there isn't anything in this game that is strictly up to skill!
But how can you possibly argue that somebody who drops thousands (as some whales do) on brand new champs, that they can immediately awaken and rank with $, does not have a huge PURCHASED advantage over f2p players with smaller rosters and less buffed up champs!
Even in battlegrounds!
You can simply rank your way to victory.
And seriously??? Which part actually requires skill?
And do not get me wrong! There are many players with skill! And many place in the game you can prove it.
But in this game having skill never equals being at the top by itself!
I won to an account that a significant amount of rank 3s, even a rank 4 herc...
No pay to win. All skill, depends on your roster, who you get in a roll, who you pick etc. Obviously those with a bigger roster have more choices, but pay to win? No, not this mode let alone any mode.
What it is is an event for spenders to show off what they have bought and win back some of the stuff they paid for, and used previously to rank champs.
And claiming great skill when the truth is you simply have purchased a massive, well developed roster!
In the example above, if kabam provided the roster, a player with awesome skills and a very limited roster could potentally take down platinum and master alliance players.
Then we would see pure skill at work
Just please stop arguing that there is anyplace in this game where you cannot buy your way to the top!.