Do you agree that Hulkling is too strong to be a 7* ?

PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 5,406 ★★★★★
edited May 5 in General Discussion
Yesterday, Karate Mike made the claim that the game is not ready for a 7* Hulkling, which caught me by surprise since Mike is a well reknowned BGs player so is obviously in loop on competitive game modes and that there already are champs more broken than Hulkling in the game.

We have D. Thanos, Serpent, Juggernaut etc.

Hulkling is not a long form content champ unlike for example Kate.

On defense he has a ton more counters nowadays, especially compared to other dual threat champs like Medusa , in fact you don't even need a mystic to fight him.

Champs like Onslaught are not only a potent dual threat but have tremendous use in other games including Long Form Content.

Tigra who ALREADY IS in the crystal is even more broken than Hulkling, as echoed by several on the forums. She's not shut down by as many nodes as Juggernaut, and takes on a myriad of defenders, including Serpent, D Thanos, Thing, Kindred, Red Skull, Zola, Nick Fury, Sentinel.



This Screenshot is against a rank 4 Red SKull so she is literally punching up 2 ranks, and all it took was a single sp2. So just imagine a rank 4 sig 200 where only a single sp2 will nuke even the tankier defenders. Majority of the people living under a cave think she's fine to release since she has a high skill ceiling, but even Trappy said the skill requirement in BGs is significantly less in a video where he agreed shed be too OP as a 7*.

We can all see the retaliation in regards to the exclusive 36k unit paywalled Dark Phoenix, we get that the company needs to make money, so EVEN IF you guys thought Hulkling was too strong to be a 7*, you could have at least put Galan in the crystal and put a different champ in his place for the Titan.

Alternatively, the other option could have been to just put Dark Phoenix within the crystal as if you're only interested in say 3 of the 5 champs, and you manage to pull them early on, you still have to drop loads of units to get her.

July 4 which many argue will benefit a player overall more , already has a 36k spend for the chase champ, so having this one also require 36k just seems like a slap to the face. At least, Hulkling could have made the spend more worth it as with 6 champs in the crystal, now youll be more inclined to spend more units and end up closer to the 36k for Phoenix . Especially since Apoc won't be starting with extra charges in BGs

Do you agree that Hulkling is too strong to be a 7* ? 287 votes

I agree
27%
GroundedWisdomrazielCondemnedToeBizaaroShaggyMkus234Bluestonespiderknight616GarloJyotishkapseudosaneSachhyam257GyanemdjerButtehrsSoundwarpCASrinivasClatoniusAyden_noah1Agent_Tzerodude 79 votes
I disagree
72%
EgyptOverseerVaniteliaWorld EaterJaemon512BKSwisherSweetbenshbbuffajrTendersquadJets44JnacuaCdy824Johnnooooooquando213FireatwillBigTuna_2054SakkbanTerraMagrailothosJazz_MessengerBosley 208 votes
«13

Comments

  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 6,175 ★★★★★
    edited May 5
    I disagree
    Polygon said:

    These were exactly my thoughts, saying the game is not ready then proceeding to add Tigra and FAM is absolutely laughable lol I think the actual reason they didn't go for it is because they knew if Hulkling was locked behind that final milestone (and they absolutely wanted to lock one champ behind that final milestone to make even more money of course) there would've been a lot backlash so instead they just added a champ we knew nothing about until the spotlight came out which softened the blow, as seen in the other thread where most people seem to be completely fine with them locking a 4.5/5 defender behind one of the highest paywalls of the year, bummer but I'm probably going to have to spend 💀

    Good catch in bringing up FAM that I left out. I think in BGs they are either equal or close, however one crucial point which makes FAM better overall is that he is significantly the better long form content champ.

    The Carina Challenge by MSD for Dimensional Beings, I was able to do 50% of Silver Centurions health and this was just a 6*.

    Imagine how devastating the 7* will be.

    FAM is in my opinion an even bigger deal than Tigra, he may not be a nuke (tho he still finishes most fights in 40 secs) but he is 100% one of the best dual threat champs in the entire game. Defensively, ten times better than Hulkling it's a guaranteed timeout without a counter if RNG decides to trigger his armor buffs too often and interrupts your rotations, Hulkling you can still manage even if it's a long fight and you can't parry at all, you won't timeout and you can come out full health. offensively he can handle both short and long form content (Hulkling sucks for long form content) and he can handle most current meta defenders easily (Onslaught, Photon, Bullseye, Dust, Red Skull, Arcade etc).
    The 7* is going to be absolutely busted and the fact that they still had the nerve to claim Hulkling is too much for the game right now is wild and funny at the same time lol if that is the case then FAM has no business being in that crystal either. Sure Hulkling is a faster nuke, but FAM makes up for it by being way better on defense and being great for long form content as well.
    Hands down, the best champ in that crystal by far and even if Hulkling had been in it, I would still put FAM at the same level as Hulkling for all the reasons I just mentioned.
  • TheMostHated1TheMostHated1 Member Posts: 86
    I disagree
    Secondly, how is hulkling too strong, yet champs like onslaught and juggernaut are allowed to exist🤔
  • ErcarretErcarret Member Posts: 3,132 ★★★★★
    One thing that I think is worth keeping in mind is that Fantman is in the crystal, and Hulkling is one of the best Fantman counters. If they added both at the same time, that would kind of neutralize Fantman's defensive prowess. By not adding Hulking at the same time, we can see a resurgence of Fantman on defense without worrying too much about excellent counters. I'm not saying that there won't be any counters to him, but we'll likely see him countered by different champions now than during his 6* heyday. I think that's a good thing. Hulkling will probably show up sooner or later, especially with this pool being as good as it is.

    I'm not sure if I buy the "Hulkling is too OP for the game right now" argument, but I nonetheless think it may be wise to not release every broken champion in one crystal. I like the release cadence of older champs so far and I agree with Kabam's view of trying to hold some of the great ones back so that they have great older champs that they can release every now and again for a long period of time. I'd rather see a sustainable 5-year plan than just have all of them dumped on us in one year.
  • AlmccarthyAlmccarthy Member Posts: 156 ★★
    edited May 5
    I disagree
    I just dont understand it, the only thing I can think of is that hulkling was the most drafted champion and on that basis they are saying hes to much for the game ? I honestly have no idea. Once again with serpant being allowed then Hulking is not op
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 12,713 ★★★★★
    I agree
    Idk if hulking is the strongest but tigra , who has better damage and utility than hulking, has a high skill cap and not the favourite for everyone, especially not much useful for uru gang.

    FAM is not as good as hulking on attack. I think it's the versatility and SIMPLICITY of hulking in attack. He is not broken by any means, especially not when dthanos is a 7*, but he is so simple to use and is a lot more versatile.

    You definitely would have seen more hulking compared to fam, tigra and even cgr in bg decks, and even when 6* went obsolete for bgs, hulking is easily one of the last standing when days of tigra(in low to mid tiers) and FAM were long gone for most endgame players. That must be saying something right?


    Although I personally don't think any champ is BROKEN except cgr in a bg pov rn.
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 12,713 ★★★★★
    edited May 5
    I agree
    It should've been galan, and dark pheonix could be additional trophy or a trophy reserved for more bigger events like j4, cyber or banquet. Kabam planners do baffle me. Even a high schooler make better decisions.


    I think we shouldn't be debating about why hulking is not there, we should be debating why galan is not there, and why pheonix is paywalled instead of being the one in regular crystal.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 6,175 ★★★★★
    I disagree

    Idk if hulking is the strongest but tigra , who has better damage and utility than hulking, has a high skill cap and not the favourite for everyone, especially not much useful for uru gang.

    FAM is not as good as hulking on attack. I think it's the versatility and SIMPLICITY of hulking in attack. He is not broken by any means, especially not when dthanos is a 7*, but he is so simple to use and is a lot more versatile.

    You definitely would have seen more hulking compared to fam, tigra and even cgr in bg decks, and even when 6* went obsolete for bgs, hulking is easily one of the last standing when days of tigra(in low to mid tiers) and FAM were long gone for most endgame players. That must be saying something right?


    Although I personally don't think any champ is BROKEN except cgr in a bg pov rn.

    Skill cap is irrelevant here, it's like saying Quake has a high skill cap so she's not as good, just doesn't make sense. Tigra in the right hands is faster than Hulkling for basically any matchup without neutralize or rupture immunity.

    As for FAM, he may not be as fast as Hulkling but he can take basically all the current meta defenders Hulkling can take just not in 35 secs. So, while Hulkling is to some extent better for short fights, the difference isn't big enough for them to just go "oh no we're definitely not ready for that".

    I still have both Hulkling and FAM 6* in my deck myself, I can't really see power levels being that different and far apart that they couldn't add both.
  • WhatsGoodEnglishWhatsGoodEnglish Member Posts: 149 ★★
    I disagree
    I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if Hulkling ends up in the game later on this year taking the place of one of the eidol champions in the Titan Crystal like Gallan is next refresh
  • Chris_SummersChris_Summers Member Posts: 337 ★★★
    I disagree
    We have champs like Serpent, and Onslaught, and Photon, and Enchantress, and Deathless Thanos, and soon to be Future Ant-man, and Yelena, and Dark Phoenix and we’re worried about bringing a counter to all of these fools… 🙄
  • PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 5,406 ★★★★★

    Idk if hulking is the strongest but tigra , who has better damage and utility than hulking, has a high skill cap and not the favourite for everyone, especially not much useful for uru gang.

    FAM is not as good as hulking on attack. I think it's the versatility and SIMPLICITY of hulking in attack. He is not broken by any means, especially not when dthanos is a 7*, but he is so simple to use and is a lot more versatile.

    You definitely would have seen more hulking compared to fam, tigra and even cgr in bg decks, and even when 6* went obsolete for bgs, hulking is easily one of the last standing when days of tigra(in low to mid tiers) and FAM were long gone for most endgame players. That must be saying something right?


    Although I personally don't think any champ is BROKEN except cgr in a bg pov rn.

    Skill cap is irrelevant here, it's like saying Quake has a high skill cap so she's not as good, just doesn't make sense. Tigra in the right hands is faster than Hulkling for basically any matchup without neutralize or rupture immunity.

    As for FAM, he may not be as fast as Hulkling but he can take basically all the current meta defenders Hulkling can take just not in 35 secs. So, while Hulkling is to some extent better for short fights, the difference isn't big enough for them to just go "oh no we're definitely not ready for that".

    I still have both Hulkling and FAM 6* in my deck myself, I can't really see power levels being that different and far apart that they couldn't add both.
    In addition to that, Tigras skill requirement is substantially less for BGs where fights end after 1 sp2 (can punish heavies). Plus some defenders specials have very easy spacing lile Maestro, Serpent, Red Skull.

    Also, @captain_rogers @ItsClobberinTime ease of use or skill ceiling was never a factor when we have champs like Deathless Thanos and Juggernaut in game already ☠️
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 6,175 ★★★★★
    I disagree
    Polygon said:

    Idk if hulking is the strongest but tigra , who has better damage and utility than hulking, has a high skill cap and not the favourite for everyone, especially not much useful for uru gang.

    FAM is not as good as hulking on attack. I think it's the versatility and SIMPLICITY of hulking in attack. He is not broken by any means, especially not when dthanos is a 7*, but he is so simple to use and is a lot more versatile.

    You definitely would have seen more hulking compared to fam, tigra and even cgr in bg decks, and even when 6* went obsolete for bgs, hulking is easily one of the last standing when days of tigra(in low to mid tiers) and FAM were long gone for most endgame players. That must be saying something right?


    Although I personally don't think any champ is BROKEN except cgr in a bg pov rn.

    Skill cap is irrelevant here, it's like saying Quake has a high skill cap so she's not as good, just doesn't make sense. Tigra in the right hands is faster than Hulkling for basically any matchup without neutralize or rupture immunity.

    As for FAM, he may not be as fast as Hulkling but he can take basically all the current meta defenders Hulkling can take just not in 35 secs. So, while Hulkling is to some extent better for short fights, the difference isn't big enough for them to just go "oh no we're definitely not ready for that".

    I still have both Hulkling and FAM 6* in my deck myself, I can't really see power levels being that different and far apart that they couldn't add both.
    In addition to that, Tigras skill requirement is substantially less for BGs where fights end after 1 sp2 (can punish heavies). Plus some defenders specials have very easy spacing lile Maestro, Serpent, Red Skull.

    Also, @captain_rogers @ItsClobberinTime ease of use or skill ceiling was never a factor when we have champs like Deathless Thanos and Juggernaut in game already ☠️
    Also you don't necessarily need to miss and punish specials to get good damage with her, maybe if you're punching two ranks above but with the 7* I don't think that will even be a problem anymore because she's already going to be hitting so damn hard.

    Yeah that's why I said skill cap is irrelevant, if a champ is capable of doing cheesy stuff then it is what it is and that's that. People not being good at it doesn't make a champ worse.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,294 ★★★★★
    I agree
    Considering I still rock my 6* in most content, maybe at the moment. In time, perhaps.
  • VaniteliaVanitelia Member Posts: 594 ★★★
    I disagree
    This is the reason why the argument of a champ being too OP is a silly argument to have. He was released after the balancing program started. If they didn't feel he was too OP then, then why is he too OP now? What's the point of a balancing program if there isn't enough foresight to plan for the future? I get it for the champs released before the BP started, but that's not the case here.

    Hulkling
    So far we’re happy with how Hulkling is performing in the Battlerealm! Hulkling was designed to be a Cosmic bruiser, with access to consistent damage as long as you can trigger his Pierce and Fury buffs. In Alliance Wars, we’re seeing him match up well against some of his intended targets such as Peni Parker, while also doing well in other matchups where you can utilize his Immunities. All in all, we’re happy with where Hulkling has landed and will be leaving him as is.
  • TheMostHated1TheMostHated1 Member Posts: 86
    I disagree

    To add to your Juggs and Tigra comments, here's another even better example:
    https://youtu.be/AygNlkwB_ZQ?si=oXW8lkKT3NBovq7t
    550k healthpools in six hits, yet the game is not ready for Hulkling lmao it is for Red Guardian but not for Hulkling, sure.

    Mane I didn’t even think about red guardian, like kabam miss me with that “Hulkling is too strong” argument💀
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 6,175 ★★★★★
    I disagree
    BigBlueOx said:

    Idk if hulking is the strongest but tigra , who has better damage and utility than hulking, has a high skill cap and not the favourite for everyone, especially not much useful for uru gang.

    FAM is not as good as hulking on attack. I think it's the versatility and SIMPLICITY of hulking in attack. He is not broken by any means, especially not when dthanos is a 7*, but he is so simple to use and is a lot more versatile.

    You definitely would have seen more hulking compared to fam, tigra and even cgr in bg decks, and even when 6* went obsolete for bgs, hulking is easily one of the last standing when days of tigra(in low to mid tiers) and FAM were long gone for most endgame players. That must be saying something right?


    Although I personally don't think any champ is BROKEN except cgr in a bg pov rn.

    Skill cap is irrelevant here, it's like saying Quake has a high skill cap so she's not as good, just doesn't make sense. Tigra in the right hands is faster than Hulkling for basically any matchup without neutralize or rupture immunity.

    As for FAM, he may not be as fast as Hulkling but he can take basically all the current meta defenders Hulkling can take just not in 35 secs. So, while Hulkling is to some extent better for short fights, the difference isn't big enough for them to just go "oh no we're definitely not ready for that".

    I still have both Hulkling and FAM 6* in my deck myself, I can't really see power levels being that different and far apart that they couldn't add both.
    I don’t have a super strong opinion on Hulkling being too strong to be a 7star… but I don’t see how we can say that skill ask of a kit is irrelevant either. Out of all the champs at the very top of their classes Hulkling has the highest utility AND the lowest skill ask when maximizing his damage. That combination of utility and damage is why I can understand Kabam’s position on him specifically… not saying I share that opinion but I understand

    That said, I don’t think the same applies to CGR. There’s a much higher skill ask in general and there’s a lot that can disturb his optimal “flow” effectively neutering the character. He may be slightly easier to use than Tigra, but more messed with him. I think he’s more likely to come first.
    I worded my comment wrong, it's not that it's entirely irrelevant I just don't think that that makes a champ worse if that makes sense. The abilities and the potential are both there regardless.

    As for ease of use, I would agree with that if Juggs and Red Guardian weren't already in the game as 7*, but they are so I can't really agree with that either.

    I don't know what their true reasons are for not adding Hulkling but I find it hard to believe they genuinely think he'd be that strong at this point. Look at Red Guardian doing 550k HPs in six hits or Juggs doing fights in 20 seconds, it's absurd to even think Hulkling would do more harm than good to the game when champs like that are already 7*. You could try to argue the dual threat potential for which the other two obviously suck but as it stands, Hulkling is not even that good of a defender anymore because of all the mystic attackers that melt anything with a lot of buffs (Chavez, Kushala etc) these days.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 6,175 ★★★★★
    I disagree

    To add to your Juggs and Tigra comments, here's another even better example:
    https://youtu.be/AygNlkwB_ZQ?si=oXW8lkKT3NBovq7t
    550k healthpools in six hits, yet the game is not ready for Hulkling lmao it is for Red Guardian but not for Hulkling, sure.

    Mane I didn’t even think about red guardian, like kabam miss me with that “Hulkling is too strong” argument💀
    "The game is not ready for Hulkling or CGR"
    *Red Guardian casually killing anything in BGs in six heavy attacks* 💀
  • HungaryHippoHungaryHippo Member Posts: 1,164 ★★★★
    I disagree
    Right there with you OP. Slower but also against r4 in GC.


  • xPolloLocoxPolloLoco Member Posts: 91
    I disagree
    I've been saying the same thing bro. Tigra is a bigger nuke than hulkling. Tigra is going to be ridiculous in battlegrounds. She will be a instant ban every match even if you have her also.
  • TheMostHated1TheMostHated1 Member Posts: 86
    edited May 5
    I disagree

    To add to your Juggs and Tigra comments, here's another even better example:
    https://youtu.be/AygNlkwB_ZQ?si=oXW8lkKT3NBovq7t
    550k healthpools in six hits, yet the game is not ready for Hulkling lmao it is for Red Guardian but not for Hulkling, sure.

    Mane I didn’t even think about red guardian, like kabam miss me with that “Hulkling is too strong” argument💀
    "The game is not ready for Hulkling or CGR"
    *Red Guardian casually killing anything in BGs in six heavy attacks* 💀
    Exactly bro, what is in hulkling, CGR, and scorpion’s kit that’s so strong that they’re “too good to be 7 stars” but the game is allowed to have characters such as juggernaut, okoye, and now red guardian, fantman and Tigra as 7 stars, like hulkling and CGR are not that special
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,952 ★★★★★
    edited May 6

    BigBlueOx said:

    Idk if hulking is the strongest but tigra , who has better damage and utility than hulking, has a high skill cap and not the favourite for everyone, especially not much useful for uru gang.

    FAM is not as good as hulking on attack. I think it's the versatility and SIMPLICITY of hulking in attack. He is not broken by any means, especially not when dthanos is a 7*, but he is so simple to use and is a lot more versatile.

    You definitely would have seen more hulking compared to fam, tigra and even cgr in bg decks, and even when 6* went obsolete for bgs, hulking is easily one of the last standing when days of tigra(in low to mid tiers) and FAM were long gone for most endgame players. That must be saying something right?


    Although I personally don't think any champ is BROKEN except cgr in a bg pov rn.

    Skill cap is irrelevant here, it's like saying Quake has a high skill cap so she's not as good, just doesn't make sense. Tigra in the right hands is faster than Hulkling for basically any matchup without neutralize or rupture immunity.

    As for FAM, he may not be as fast as Hulkling but he can take basically all the current meta defenders Hulkling can take just not in 35 secs. So, while Hulkling is to some extent better for short fights, the difference isn't big enough for them to just go "oh no we're definitely not ready for that".

    I still have both Hulkling and FAM 6* in my deck myself, I can't really see power levels being that different and far apart that they couldn't add both.
    I don’t have a super strong opinion on Hulkling being too strong to be a 7star… but I don’t see how we can say that skill ask of a kit is irrelevant either. Out of all the champs at the very top of their classes Hulkling has the highest utility AND the lowest skill ask when maximizing his damage. That combination of utility and damage is why I can understand Kabam’s position on him specifically… not saying I share that opinion but I understand

    That said, I don’t think the same applies to CGR. There’s a much higher skill ask in general and there’s a lot that can disturb his optimal “flow” effectively neutering the character. He may be slightly easier to use than Tigra, but more messed with him. I think he’s more likely to come first.
    I worded my comment wrong, it's not that it's entirely irrelevant I just don't think that that makes a champ worse if that makes sense. The abilities and the potential are both there regardless.

    As for ease of use, I would agree with that if Juggs and Red Guardian weren't already in the game as 7*, but they are so I can't really agree with that either.

    I don't know what their true reasons are for not adding Hulkling but I find it hard to believe they genuinely think he'd be that strong at this point. Look at Red Guardian doing 550k HPs in six hits or Juggs doing fights in 20 seconds, it's absurd to even think Hulkling would do more harm than good to the game when champs like that are already 7*. You could try to argue the dual threat potential for which the other two obviously suck but as it stands, Hulkling is not even that good of a defender anymore because of all the mystic attackers that melt anything with a lot of buffs (Chavez, Kushala etc) these days.
    Just my opinion here, but it’s not just the damage output when looking at Hulkling, his utility is even more insane. He’s immune to shock, poison, power drain, burn and steal. He reduces healblock duration and his immunities can be used to fuel his in a kit. In addition to that when converting his charges he gains power. As a result there’s no easy way to turn off his kit without punishing any champ that uses buffs. Right now he’s one of the toughest toughest defenders in the Battlegrounds as a 6star as he’s constantly going indestructible and stalling either his power bar.

    Conversely, both Red G and Juggy have really no defensive value and the game team has access to fairly easy off buttons that don’t hinder 60% of the other champions in the game.

    Now again, I’m not arguing that he’s too OP, but I can even foresee a reality where Hercules comes out as a 7star first now as even he’s easier to turn off than Hulkling now that we have champs that limit burst damage. And Hulkling hits harder, faster, and has far far more utility
  • PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 5,406 ★★★★★
    BigBlueOx said:

    BigBlueOx said:

    Idk if hulking is the strongest but tigra , who has better damage and utility than hulking, has a high skill cap and not the favourite for everyone, especially not much useful for uru gang.

    FAM is not as good as hulking on attack. I think it's the versatility and SIMPLICITY of hulking in attack. He is not broken by any means, especially not when dthanos is a 7*, but he is so simple to use and is a lot more versatile.

    You definitely would have seen more hulking compared to fam, tigra and even cgr in bg decks, and even when 6* went obsolete for bgs, hulking is easily one of the last standing when days of tigra(in low to mid tiers) and FAM were long gone for most endgame players. That must be saying something right?


    Although I personally don't think any champ is BROKEN except cgr in a bg pov rn.

    Skill cap is irrelevant here, it's like saying Quake has a high skill cap so she's not as good, just doesn't make sense. Tigra in the right hands is faster than Hulkling for basically any matchup without neutralize or rupture immunity.

    As for FAM, he may not be as fast as Hulkling but he can take basically all the current meta defenders Hulkling can take just not in 35 secs. So, while Hulkling is to some extent better for short fights, the difference isn't big enough for them to just go "oh no we're definitely not ready for that".

    I still have both Hulkling and FAM 6* in my deck myself, I can't really see power levels being that different and far apart that they couldn't add both.
    I don’t have a super strong opinion on Hulkling being too strong to be a 7star… but I don’t see how we can say that skill ask of a kit is irrelevant either. Out of all the champs at the very top of their classes Hulkling has the highest utility AND the lowest skill ask when maximizing his damage. That combination of utility and damage is why I can understand Kabam’s position on him specifically… not saying I share that opinion but I understand

    That said, I don’t think the same applies to CGR. There’s a much higher skill ask in general and there’s a lot that can disturb his optimal “flow” effectively neutering the character. He may be slightly easier to use than Tigra, but more messed with him. I think he’s more likely to come first.
    I worded my comment wrong, it's not that it's entirely irrelevant I just don't think that that makes a champ worse if that makes sense. The abilities and the potential are both there regardless.

    As for ease of use, I would agree with that if Juggs and Red Guardian weren't already in the game as 7*, but they are so I can't really agree with that either.

    I don't know what their true reasons are for not adding Hulkling but I find it hard to believe they genuinely think he'd be that strong at this point. Look at Red Guardian doing 550k HPs in six hits or Juggs doing fights in 20 seconds, it's absurd to even think Hulkling would do more harm than good to the game when champs like that are already 7*. You could try to argue the dual threat potential for which the other two obviously suck but as it stands, Hulkling is not even that good of a defender anymore because of all the mystic attackers that melt anything with a lot of buffs (Chavez, Kushala etc) these days.
    Just my opinion here, but it’s not just the damage output when looking at Hulkling, his utility is even more insane. He’s immune to shock, poison, power drain, burn and steal. He reduces healblock duration and his immunities can be used to fuel his in a kit. In addition to that when converting his charges he gains power. As a result there’s no easy way to turn off his kit without punishing any champ that uses buffs. Right now he’s one of the toughest toughest defenders in the Battlegrounds as a 6star as he’s constantly going indestructible and stalling either his power bar.

    Conversely, both Red G and Juggy have really no defensive value and the game team has access to fairly easy off buttons that don’t hinder 60% of the other champions in the game.

    Now again, I’m not arguing that he’s too OP, but I can even foresee a reality where Hercules comes out as a 7star first now as even he’s easier to turn off than Hulkling now that we have champs that limit burst damage. And Hulkling hits harder, faster, and has far far more utility
    You are not arguing hes too OP but still providing them reasons if they were to cherrypick this thread and quote the 1 person supporting them. But your analysis is missing a chunk, I will try to go in depth.

    1) he is nowhere near the speed of Juggs, Red Guardian, Thanos, Sparky, Tigra etc.
    Did you see my screenshot and the one from @HungaryHippo ? Tigra is punching up 2 ranks and still destroying red skull (a champion that Hulkling has class advantage for)

    2) those champs i listed above are just as easy to play as him except for Tigra, who i wont repeat all the details but the skill requirement is less in BGs.go look at trappys vid on her being too OP to be released as 7*

    3) you act like hes a top defender when almost every mystic counters? Hes no serpent and not even a medusa. Medusa needs a lot more specific counters.

    4) Also as i mentioned above, you dont even need a mystic counter. Crossbones works, so does black cat or titania. Im sure theres more

    5) deathless thanos is a far better dual threat and brain dead easy to play, hello?

    6) hulkling has no long form content use. FAM who is a top tech dual threat and similar to Tigra and Hulkling in the crystal, does.

    7) onslaught is another top dual threat that has several uses in every game mode including long form content.
  • CdjcdkjCdjcdkj Member Posts: 143 ★★
    I disagree
    We got serpent is the biggest example as no one is too op as 7* with a defender like this
Sign In or Register to comment.