Arenas - Do we fight AI?

Disgruntled_User_123Disgruntled_User_123 Member Posts: 1,094 ★★★
in General Discussion
When you fight in the Arenas, do you fight against AI rather than another person? If it’s a person, how can you pause the game? Just wondering.

Comments

  • NikSalvatore013NikSalvatore013 Member Posts: 14 ★
    I also think it's AI. I mean, we can choose our match and whose champion is to fight whom, and our opponents seem like they don't have a choice.

    I think our champions are in the pool of the arena during the 2-hour hibernation period before we can use them again.
  • roberto94roberto94 Member Posts: 779 ★★
    We’re fighting against AI. If it were against an oridinary player then the fight could be be too long and stupid because both would wait for parry, intercepting, shallow evade and all that that we mastered in the game. That’s why it’s better to fight against AI because their purpose is to go all out
  • IcsGrecIcsGrec Member Posts: 919 ★★★
    All the fights in the game are against AI.
  • winterthurwinterthur Member Posts: 8,063 ★★★★★
    roberto94 wrote: »
    We’re fighting against AI. If it were against an oridinary player then the fight could be be too long and stupid because both would wait for parry, intercepting, shallow evade and all that that we mastered in the game. That’s why it’s better to fight against AI because their purpose is to go all out

    It need not be so. A timer can be implemented and a random damage over time debuff is activated at start (example). It could actually be very interesting.
  • roberto94roberto94 Member Posts: 779 ★★
    winterthur wrote: »
    roberto94 wrote: »
    We’re fighting against AI. If it were against an oridinary player then the fight could be be too long and stupid because both would wait for parry, intercepting, shallow evade and all that that we mastered in the game. That’s why it’s better to fight against AI because their purpose is to go all out

    It need not be so. A timer can be implemented and a random damage over time debuff is activated at start (example). It could actually be very interesting.

    Now that’s something that could work

  • TheSquish671TheSquish671 Member Posts: 2,880 ★★★★★
    winterthur wrote: »
    roberto94 wrote: »
    We’re fighting against AI. If it were against an oridinary player then the fight could be be too long and stupid because both would wait for parry, intercepting, shallow evade and all that that we mastered in the game. That’s why it’s better to fight against AI because their purpose is to go all out

    It need not be so. A timer can be implemented and a random damage over time debuff is activated at start (example). It could actually be very interesting.

    Yeah that's a good idea and maybe when the timer runs out both champions start to degen 1% of their own health per second(so high health champs do not have the advantage)and all healing is blocked.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Duke_SilverDuke_Silver Member Posts: 2,421 ★★★★
    winterthur wrote: »
    roberto94 wrote: »
    We’re fighting against AI. If it were against an oridinary player then the fight could be be too long and stupid because both would wait for parry, intercepting, shallow evade and all that that we mastered in the game. That’s why it’s better to fight against AI because their purpose is to go all out

    It need not be so. A timer can be implemented and a random damage over time debuff is activated at start (example). It could actually be very interesting.

    I like that idea, maybe something similar to Brute Force or Bane.
  • ZzyzxGuyZzyzxGuy Member Posts: 1,292 ★★★
    Human vs human in MCoC would be a disaster. The game and champs are not designed that way.
  • likewhoa021likewhoa021 Member Posts: 38 ★
    I thought quikmatches were PVP ? My last one sure felt like it was, did not play like AI at all ...
  • ZzyzxGuyZzyzxGuy Member Posts: 1,292 ★★★
    likewhoa021 wrote: »
    I thought quikmatches were PVP ? My last one sure felt like it was, did not play like AI at all ...

    Nope. AI.

    All AI every single fight in any scenario.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • winterthurwinterthur Member Posts: 8,063 ★★★★★
    DaywalkerUK wrote: »
    The servers cant even handle AI opponents, can you imagine the outages if kabam tried to implement proper PVP? 🤣
    Haji_Saab wrote: »
    It really annoys me when the other person pauses the game to go on a 10 minute break ... common courtesy not to do that !

    I was thinking it should not be free for all play.
    Maybe something like a controlled event, with set timing for various time zones. Borrowing an idea from Goldpool, say only 1024 Summoners qualify for it and with knockout progression.
    Interesting to find out who will be champ overall.
  • ZzyzxGuyZzyzxGuy Member Posts: 1,292 ★★★
    Wakanda4Ever278 wrote: »
    You didn't notice the name of the opponents? It's always "Thanos Team", or "Kang Team", or something generic like that.6xe807w348cj.jpg

    No, that's only during a certain string of fights with a certain PI.
  • IrishReaverIrishReaver Member Posts: 27 ★
    It’s AI using other players champs. Always AI, nothing but AI.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • DankestChefDankestChef Member Posts: 420 ★★★
    of course! If it was actually real players it will be impossible to reach 1mil points. why?


    cuz its gonna be a parry party. nobody wants that


















    unless ur using mordo or BP CW. thats a difference story.
  • Blade2099Blade2099 Member Posts: 34
    Finlghting other players will be a disaster .
    Arenas are already time consuming and power consuming but if you fight against real players which can have boosts on you will hate arena more than anything
  • winterthurwinterthur Member Posts: 8,063 ★★★★★
    :D

    There are at least three groups of people.
    1/ B) Bring it on! B)
    2/ No, servers can't take it, people will just sit back - how to fight?, the whales will win
    3/ PvP, don't we have that already?

    :D:D:D
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.