**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Comments
Read his abilities in the quest. He’s absurd
Plus I prefer it when they nerf champs with content instead of a direct champion nerf. Not that I like nerfs.
HERES YA BOI AEGON
Well, people cried about nerf of Blade and turned out to be right. And it makes more sense to want nerf sooner before later. If you let players to spend s*load of money and resources to get him and rank him up, you can never ever nerf him after. That's obvious.
XXX?.. 🤔
Aegon is going to be very much a ramp up champion. Some of his abilities don't kick in until he has 750-1000 combo hits in a quest. Most of the time you aren't ever going to get to that point. I'll agree that he is a difficult fight without the right champ, however, I don't think we can call for nerfs until we see him without all of the ridiculous nodes that he has on him currently. And he for sure isn't going to be a good defender, because he will never be able to get into a combo.
Now The Champion on the other hand... He just seems like an excuse for Kabam to throw block penetration and unstoppable on the boss node in war, and then make him extremely powerful against the champions that typically solo bosses. I don't like his mechanics at all.
He is a marvel character that was created by kabam. There could be a day when you see an Aegon comic out there or in a movie long down the line. You're that this game is not as it intended, and that is a playable comic book.
How were people "right" about nerfing Blade? Blade hasn't been nerfed, we've had other champions introduced that are as powerful (or more powerful), and we've had counters to blade introduced, and the game moves on.
How exactly was the call to nerf blade "right"?
From where I'm sitting, it was an overreaction caused mainly by the fact it was the first rank 5 for many people, and they were comparing him to rank 4s....Blade wasn't changed, the game just added counters and other powerful champs.
It’s because at the time aw defense was basically just villains and mystics and blade countered most of them which made him a must have champ
@ON12355 how do you know? Do you already have him? You have tested his offensive abilities out personally? Did you get early access to him?
No? Oh ok so you ARE basing this off the UC version which you shouldn't ever do. Blade isn't as OP as you are making him out to be as he relies on a few synergies to really make him great. You are always going to have champs that are better than others no matter what. Its part of the game.
If you get him, I bet you wont ask for a nerf at that point will you?
Regardless of your forum name, you dont decide who's worthy. Marvel and Kabam do. Kabam cant make a character without permission and approval from Marvel. Even if you separate them in your mind, hes not going anywhere and now has a place in Marvel history.
he has nothing crazy he's mainly a champion for loong fights
/ the champion in other hands is gonna be a crazy problem in aw
such as groot ? hahaha
Except he will be able to carry over his combo fight to fight so ye
When it stops being the case as it happens everytime, I'll stop using the argument. Take a look at the "nerf blade" posts. 100's of them, then people got him. As the posts kept coming more and more people who got, him suddenly did a 180 and started saying not to nerf him. Its a continuous cycle.
-.-
95% is only at 3 bars of power and is the least useful ability on Blade.
So Taskmasters ability to become debuff immune after 10 placed debuffs is less effective than Blade staying at 3 bars of power in order to shrug off debuffs 95% faster?
Well, they did it to Dr. Strange
Those Champs stopped the game from being able to move forward.