Should kabam let us swap items, awakening gems, t4cc, revives (only within your ally)

slayer6slayer6 Member Posts: 377 ★★
in Suggestions and Requests
Within the alliance only of course for instance i have full inventory of t4 tech and another member has full inventory of science then we could swap them with each other for say i dunno 100 units per t4.
Or if someone has an awakening gem they got no champ to use it on maybe swap with someone who has an awakeing gem you need for like 300 units?

Should kabam let us swap items, awakening gems, t4cc, revives (only within your ally) 84 votes

Yes great idea
28%
SpeedbumpProxusername7312gourav0890JustLaCopeThatKnashDrakenRisengawToxicBladeKillSwitchKobster84Ghostboytjiemmmpunchdoctorbhumberto20043WebheadUnltdslayer6Mr_EChuckiesol_I_The_Watcher 24 votes
No i dont think so
60%
DNA3000GroundedWisdomwinterthurdanielmathSkeleton777LeNoirFaineantEb0ny-O-M4wSwe_wolfisdapps2goxNigAddyosFrostyFallencircusRich_RyderTerraFoxhero007JohnyzeroWrathfulRavenSceptilemaniacSpiderCools 51 votes
Maybe
10%
A_Noob_Is1Datman257Nodude78Cap_PiggzKG05_1Arham1chasedobbins50GOLBÆgon0710 9 votes

Comments

  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • winterthurwinterthur Member Posts: 8,066 ★★★★★
    No i dont think so
    Worse scenario could be you handed over items and then get kicked out and removed as friend too.
  • slayer6slayer6 Member Posts: 377 ★★
    Yes great idea
    Ya have to have the same thing to trade like a t4 tech crystal for a t4 skill crystal ya cant just trade a t4cc for a team revive or something small
  • FhfjghhggggjfhfjgFhfjghhggggjfhfjg Member Posts: 4,492 ★★★★★
    No i dont think so
    It would be abused
  • LeNoirFaineantLeNoirFaineant Member Posts: 8,672 ★★★★★
    No i dont think so
    "I don't think so" isn't nearly strong enough
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,693 Guardian
    No i dont think so
    Fhfjghhggggjfhfjg said:

    It would be abused

    Worse: everything players can acquire would have to be evaluated in terms of whether it could be trade-abused, causing players to get fewer opportunities for limited high value items.

    Adding options that can be abused is the second worst thing you can do to a game. Adding options that can be abused and then eliminating every possible way they can be abused number one.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • HerrPopopHerrPopop Member Posts: 185 ★
    No i dont think so
    stop asking for things like these if you already know it can be easily abused
  • xNigxNig Member Posts: 7,332 ★★★★★
    No i dont think so
    100 units? 300 units?

    Maybe add 2 more zeroes behind and Kabam might consider it.
  • Marlo_Mike33Marlo_Mike33 Member Posts: 193 ★
    edited March 2019
    Yes great idea
    I wanted to vote maybe,Why not. Place some kind of strict punishment on it if caught being abused so alliances would think 3 times before allowing members to do things that would get them docked and monitor it just like you monitor other aspects.
  • Cap_PiggzCap_Piggz Member Posts: 48
    Maybe
    Works in theory, fails in practice. Only way I could see it work is only changing item classes, like you can only trade t4cc with other t4cc, but even still that probably wouldn't work
  • A_Noob_Is1A_Noob_Is1 Member Posts: 762 ★★
    Maybe
    It probably could work but only with like premiums, quest/ gold crystals and like t1 alphas
Sign In or Register to comment.