I don't see how someone who has neither r5 4*s nor r4 5*s is qualified to have an opinion about how good either are. This is like me rating two foods I've never eaten.
Guys can someone help me how to create account on my existing I play the game for year now and newer make it so when I try to do I get totally new account not my existing with 100 units rewards as making it, any idea why? I want to switch on another device but I can't do it also I've done same thing with my friends phone made account and he got 100 and can join on any device where game is installed
This is a place for debate. This is not a place to bully people and try to push them out of the conversation.
Most people come here to discuss the game, not "debate". Discussing and debating are two very different things. You can have an opposing side in a discussion without debating. There's a way to intelligently state an opposing viewpoint without interjecting yourself into every thread trying to argue against the ops point.
No one has insulted or shamed anyone in this thread. What's an issue is that you see some statements as shaming when they are not. Now the chat has been spammed and derailed into a discussion about feelings when it should be about the topic.
People do not appreciate having the integrity of their thread being transformed into a question about how to handle themselves. People also don't appreciate those who constantly debate just to debate. If you have an opposing viewpoint, make your case without overrunning the thread. Lets try and keep these forums about the topic at hand. In this case, it's act 5-2.
That's what we were talking about. Then it was turned to me, by one person after another. If you believe no one was attacked or shamed, you are not seeing at all. I suspect you do see it.
The conversation is about 5.2. Not about me. Yet person after person has made comments about me, where they suspect I am in the game, whether I am qualified to participate in the discussion, etc.
This is an open Forum. People have the right to participate. Anyone. Doesn't matter where they are at in the game. Trying to put someone on trial for adding to a discussion is not appropriate. The entire conversation has gone way beyond appropriate. If you read everything and direct the cause to me, that view is not in reality.
Shaming, insulting, attacking, trolling, violating, demanding proof of where someone is at in the game to validate their participation, abusing, ganging up on, etc. That all exists. If you can't see all that, and want to call me the problem, your view is vapid and askewed.
I've said long before this that the discussion is not about me. Tell it to the people who make it so.
So if someone who had started the game yesterday with a 1* Spider-Man and wolverine came on this thread and said he thought the rewards for act 5.2 were awesome for it's difficulty you'd think his opinion is valid, and that his opinion is just as valid as mine, when I have completed act 5.2 or just as valid as some sod from MMXIV who 100% it within 3 hours of it being released?
Sorry web but that's just a big no no. This is why nobody takes you seriously bud
This is a place for debate. This is not a place to bully people and try to push them out of the conversation.
Most people come here to discuss the game, not "debate". Discussing and debating are two very different things. You can have an opposing side in a discussion without debating. There's a way to intelligently state an opposing viewpoint without interjecting yourself into every thread trying to argue against the ops point.
No one has insulted or shamed anyone in this thread. What's an issue is that you see some statements as shaming when they are not. Now the chat has been spammed and derailed into a discussion about feelings when it should be about the topic.
People do not appreciate having the integrity of their thread being transformed into a question about how to handle themselves. People also don't appreciate those who constantly debate just to debate. If you have an opposing viewpoint, make your case without overrunning the thread. Lets try and keep these forums about the topic at hand. In this case, it's act 5-2.
That's what we were talking about. Then it was turned to me, by one person after another. If you believe no one was attacked or shamed, you are not seeing at all. I suspect you do see it.
The conversation is about 5.2. Not about me. Yet person after person has made comments about me, where they suspect I am in the game, whether I am qualified to participate in the discussion, etc.
This is an open Forum. People have the right to participate. Anyone. Doesn't matter where they are at in the game. Trying to put someone on trial for adding to a discussion is not appropriate. The entire conversation has gone way beyond appropriate. If you read everything and direct the cause to me, that view is not in reality.
Shaming, insulting, attacking, trolling, violating, demanding proof of where someone is at in the game to validate their participation, abusing, ganging up on, etc. That all exists. If you can't see all that, and want to call me the problem, your view is vapid and askewed.
I've said long before this that the discussion is not about me. Tell it to the people who make it so.
So if someone who had started the game yesterday with a 1* Spider-Man and wolverine came on this thread and said he thought the rewards for act 5.2 were awesome for it's difficulty you'd think his opinion is valid, and that his opinion is just as valid as mine, when I have completed act 5.2 or just as valid as some sod from MMXIV who 100% it within 3 hours of it being released?
Sorry web but that's just a big no no. This is why nobody takes you seriously bud
Everyone's opinions are valid. That's what makes it a discussion. Have anything to say about the topic, or are you still interested in contributing to the problem? "Bud".
This is a place for debate. This is not a place to bully people and try to push them out of the conversation.
Most people come here to discuss the game, not "debate". Discussing and debating are two very different things. You can have an opposing side in a discussion without debating. There's a way to intelligently state an opposing viewpoint without interjecting yourself into every thread trying to argue against the ops point.
No one has insulted or shamed anyone in this thread. What's an issue is that you see some statements as shaming when they are not. Now the chat has been spammed and derailed into a discussion about feelings when it should be about the topic.
People do not appreciate having the integrity of their thread being transformed into a question about how to handle themselves. People also don't appreciate those who constantly debate just to debate. If you have an opposing viewpoint, make your case without overrunning the thread. Lets try and keep these forums about the topic at hand. In this case, it's act 5-2.
That's what we were talking about. Then it was turned to me, by one person after another. If you believe no one was attacked or shamed, you are not seeing at all. I suspect you do see it.
The conversation is about 5.2. Not about me. Yet person after person has made comments about me, where they suspect I am in the game, whether I am qualified to participate in the discussion, etc.
This is an open Forum. People have the right to participate. Anyone. Doesn't matter where they are at in the game. Trying to put someone on trial for adding to a discussion is not appropriate. The entire conversation has gone way beyond appropriate. If you read everything and direct the cause to me, that view is not in reality.
Shaming, insulting, attacking, trolling, violating, demanding proof of where someone is at in the game to validate their participation, abusing, ganging up on, etc. That all exists. If you can't see all that, and want to call me the problem, your view is vapid and askewed.
I've said long before this that the discussion is not about me. Tell it to the people who make it so.
So if someone who had started the game yesterday with a 1* Spider-Man and wolverine came on this thread and said he thought the rewards for act 5.2 were awesome for it's difficulty you'd think his opinion is valid, and that his opinion is just as valid as mine, when I have completed act 5.2 or just as valid as some sod from MMXIV who 100% it within 3 hours of it being released?
Sorry web but that's just a big no no. This is why nobody takes you seriously bud
Everyone's opinions are valid. That's what makes it a discussion. Have anything to say about the topic, or are you still interested in contributing to the problem? "Bud".
Please explain how someone who started yesterday has a valid opinion on act 5.2. go ahead. I'll wait.
I do not believe R4 5stars are much Better than R5 4stars. Act 5.2 rewards Are very good. 4stars are still Relevant and will be for The rest of the Game. Opinions do not Change these Facts. Again, this is 'my' roster where I'm At in the game. If you have any Reply to me, please do not Bother. This is Where I stand on the Matter. Thanks.
Gonna reply anyway, because you might as well believe up is down and such if you will believe that a R4 5* is not significantly better than a r5 4*. Rank 3 for a 5* is equivalent to Rank 5 for a 4*, and Rank 4 for a 5* is well beyond that (imagine if you could take a 4* to rank 6). 4* will always be relevant in the game for arenas for everyone, but will fade away in all other modes for those at the top, once 5* acquisition rates increase, and that will eventually trickle down.
And the rewards for 5.2 are not very good in comparison to the difficulty. I will fully retract that statement when you clear Collector with your crew, and I will admit to just being personally deficient in skill.
@GroundedWisdom
Precisely. You can't explain why someone's starting yesterday has a valid opinion on 5.2 because they don't. Because you're wrong. And yet again you're either too stubborn to admit it, or too blind to see that you're actually wrong.
This is a place for debate. This is not a place to bully people and try to push them out of the conversation.
Most people come here to discuss the game, not "debate". Discussing and debating are two very different things. You can have an opposing side in a discussion without debating. There's a way to intelligently state an opposing viewpoint without interjecting yourself into every thread trying to argue against the ops point.
No one has insulted or shamed anyone in this thread. What's an issue is that you see some statements as shaming when they are not. Now the chat has been spammed and derailed into a discussion about feelings when it should be about the topic.
People do not appreciate having the integrity of their thread being transformed into a question about how to handle themselves. People also don't appreciate those who constantly debate just to debate. If you have an opposing viewpoint, make your case without overrunning the thread. Lets try and keep these forums about the topic at hand. In this case, it's act 5-2.
That's what we were talking about. Then it was turned to me, by one person after another. If you believe no one was attacked or shamed, you are not seeing at all. I suspect you do see it.
The conversation is about 5.2. Not about me. Yet person after person has made comments about me, where they suspect I am in the game, whether I am qualified to participate in the discussion, etc.
This is an open Forum. People have the right to participate. Anyone. Doesn't matter where they are at in the game. Trying to put someone on trial for adding to a discussion is not appropriate. The entire conversation has gone way beyond appropriate. If you read everything and direct the cause to me, that view is not in reality.
Shaming, insulting, attacking, trolling, violating, demanding proof of where someone is at in the game to validate their participation, abusing, ganging up on, etc. That all exists. If you can't see all that, and want to call me the problem, your view is vapid and askewed.
I've said long before this that the discussion is not about me. Tell it to the people who make it so.
So if someone who had started the game yesterday with a 1* Spider-Man and wolverine came on this thread and said he thought the rewards for act 5.2 were awesome for it's difficulty you'd think his opinion is valid, and that his opinion is just as valid as mine, when I have completed act 5.2 or just as valid as some sod from MMXIV who 100% it within 3 hours of it being released?
Sorry web but that's just a big no no. This is why nobody takes you seriously bud
Everyone's opinions are valid. That's what makes it a discussion. Have anything to say about the topic, or are you still interested in contributing to the problem? "Bud".
Please explain how someone who started yesterday has a valid opinion on act 5.2. go ahead. I'll wait.
Nope. We're done this little dance. Free Forum. Anyone can participate. It's not required to qualify for every Thread. It's certainly not up for people to demand it. This is about 5.2, and the conversation is going to return to that.
So when you run out of arguments and complaints about harassing, you say "Nope we're done"? May I remind you you said you won't post on this subject anymore 3 or 4 pages ago?
Nobody is saying you or any other person can't post. Why are you changing the narrative? You can post your opinion 100 times for all I care. And I have the right to say it's not valid. Are we really done now?
This is a place for debate. This is not a place to bully people and try to push them out of the conversation.
Most people come here to discuss the game, not "debate". Discussing and debating are two very different things. You can have an opposing side in a discussion without debating. There's a way to intelligently state an opposing viewpoint without interjecting yourself into every thread trying to argue against the ops point.
No one has insulted or shamed anyone in this thread. What's an issue is that you see some statements as shaming when they are not. Now the chat has been spammed and derailed into a discussion about feelings when it should be about the topic.
People do not appreciate having the integrity of their thread being transformed into a question about how to handle themselves. People also don't appreciate those who constantly debate just to debate. If you have an opposing viewpoint, make your case without overrunning the thread. Lets try and keep these forums about the topic at hand. In this case, it's act 5-2.
That's what we were talking about. Then it was turned to me, by one person after another. If you believe no one was attacked or shamed, you are not seeing at all. I suspect you do see it.
The conversation is about 5.2. Not about me. Yet person after person has made comments about me, where they suspect I am in the game, whether I am qualified to participate in the discussion, etc.
This is an open Forum. People have the right to participate. Anyone. Doesn't matter where they are at in the game. Trying to put someone on trial for adding to a discussion is not appropriate. The entire conversation has gone way beyond appropriate. If you read everything and direct the cause to me, that view is not in reality.
Shaming, insulting, attacking, trolling, violating, demanding proof of where someone is at in the game to validate their participation, abusing, ganging up on, etc. That all exists. If you can't see all that, and want to call me the problem, your view is vapid and askewed.
I've said long before this that the discussion is not about me. Tell it to the people who make it so.
So if someone who had started the game yesterday with a 1* Spider-Man and wolverine came on this thread and said he thought the rewards for act 5.2 were awesome for it's difficulty you'd think his opinion is valid, and that his opinion is just as valid as mine, when I have completed act 5.2 or just as valid as some sod from MMXIV who 100% it within 3 hours of it being released?
Sorry web but that's just a big no no. This is why nobody takes you seriously bud
Everyone's opinions are valid. That's what makes it a discussion. Have anything to say about the topic, or are you still interested in contributing to the problem? "Bud".
Wrong. People with no experience with an issue or knowledge of an issue/topic do NOT have a valid opinion on that issue/topic.
This is the epitome of the "everyone gets a trophy and everyone is a beautiful and unique snowflake" generation we're in.
So when you run out of arguments and complaints about harassing, you say "Nope we're done"? May I remind you you said you won't post on this subject anymore 3 or 4 pages ago?
He said that thrice actually (or was it four times?)
To get ON topic...I'm not overly concerned with the difficulty of 5.2. In 2017, they only time I've actually NEEDED a stock of revives was for my LOL run and a small amount for Bautista Challenge. So I don't mind using some items to beat 5.2, though a couple of the fights are a tad ridiculous (Collector and Magik 5.2.4). The rewards aren't great as compared to other events of a similar difficulty, but maybe other events should be more like this one. We get tons of revives and pots from solo events if you play frequently, why not make us use them?
The idea of a "Master" difficulty quickly dropped to being completed by players not as far in-game. Personally (and maybe selfishly), I like seeing some content that players need to progress to a certain point before they can beat it. If they can use above-average skill to close the gap, I'm all for that as well.
Rank 5 4* sl against ws in realm about 220 to 240 hit combo
Rank 3 5* sl about 200 hit combo
Rank 4 5* sl about 140 hit combo
What's the Sig of each?
The rank 3 5* and rank 4 ate the same champ at same Sig at different times
Ok. Fair amount more Damage.
I commented that the CR was the same. I didn't say they were equal in every way. What I did say was that 4*'s aren't being phased out of the game.
Rank 5 4* sl against ws in realm about 220 to 240 hit combo
Rank 3 5* sl about 200 hit combo
Rank 4 5* sl about 140 hit combo
What's the Sig of each?
The rank 3 5* and rank 4 ate the same champ at same Sig at different times
Ok. Fair amount more Damage.
I commented that the CR was the same. I didn't say they were equal in every way. What I did say was that 4*'s aren't being phased out of the game.
Would you say 3* have been phased out of the game? Like would you still use 3* in difficult content?
Rank 5 4* sl against ws in realm about 220 to 240 hit combo
Rank 3 5* sl about 200 hit combo
Rank 4 5* sl about 140 hit combo
What's the Sig of each?
The rank 3 5* and rank 4 ate the same champ at same Sig at different times
Ok. Fair amount more Damage.
I commented that the CR was the same. I didn't say they were equal in every way. What I did say was that 4*'s aren't being phased out of the game.
Challenger rating is not the same for 4* or 5*, if that's what you want to say. 5* has higher critical rate than a 4* when you fight a 5* with both, for example.
This is a place for debate. This is not a place to bully people and try to push them out of the conversation.
Most people come here to discuss the game, not "debate". Discussing and debating are two very different things. You can have an opposing side in a discussion without debating. There's a way to intelligently state an opposing viewpoint without interjecting yourself into every thread trying to argue against the ops point.
No one has insulted or shamed anyone in this thread. What's an issue is that you see some statements as shaming when they are not. Now the chat has been spammed and derailed into a discussion about feelings when it should be about the topic.
People do not appreciate having the integrity of their thread being transformed into a question about how to handle themselves. People also don't appreciate those who constantly debate just to debate. If you have an opposing viewpoint, make your case without overrunning the thread. Lets try and keep these forums about the topic at hand. In this case, it's act 5-2.
That's what we were talking about. Then it was turned to me, by one person after another. If you believe no one was attacked or shamed, you are not seeing at all. I suspect you do see it.
The conversation is about 5.2. Not about me. Yet person after person has made comments about me, where they suspect I am in the game, whether I am qualified to participate in the discussion, etc.
This is an open Forum. People have the right to participate. Anyone. Doesn't matter where they are at in the game. Trying to put someone on trial for adding to a discussion is not appropriate. The entire conversation has gone way beyond appropriate. If you read everything and direct the cause to me, that view is not in reality.
Shaming, insulting, attacking, trolling, violating, demanding proof of where someone is at in the game to validate their participation, abusing, ganging up on, etc. That all exists. If you can't see all that, and want to call me the problem, your view is vapid and askewed.
I've said long before this that the discussion is not about me. Tell it to the people who make it so.
So if someone who had started the game yesterday with a 1* Spider-Man and wolverine came on this thread and said he thought the rewards for act 5.2 were awesome for it's difficulty you'd think his opinion is valid, and that his opinion is just as valid as mine, when I have completed act 5.2 or just as valid as some sod from MMXIV who 100% it within 3 hours of it being released?
Sorry web but that's just a big no no. This is why nobody takes you seriously bud
Everyone's opinions are valid. That's what makes it a discussion. Have anything to say about the topic, or are you still interested in contributing to the problem? "Bud".
Please explain how someone who started yesterday has a valid opinion on act 5.2. go ahead. I'll wait.
Nope. We're done this little dance. Free Forum. Anyone can participate. It's not required to qualify for every Thread. It's certainly not up for people to demand it. This is about 5.2, and the conversation is going to return to that.
Classic web, giving his opinion on stuff he hasn't hsd the hands on experience with, then cries victim an abuse then when asked for facts just says an done. Classic websnatcher
You state everyone has an opinion but if it derriere from yours then there wrong, your just bad news for this forum an community, but that's just my opinion
I think we'd ALL appreciate just ONE basic 4* Awakening Gem for either completion or exploration. Please. Unless Grandmaster's Favor gives us like 85 million of every shard and a permanent increase of attack by 1000000% or something insane like that, these rewards aren't great. If Grandmaster's Favor is really as amazing as you say, then leave it. But if there is even a chance that people won't like it, an Awakening Gem HAS to be in there. That's the only notable aspect of rewards, so if it's not freaking awesome, something else needs to go in, and we all agree that an Awakening Gem would easily do the job.
There are several occasions where you've changed the flow of conversation to yourself. If you feel someone has "shamed" you (a bit of an exaggeration as they are just looking for a discussion with those who have similar experience) the rules state to privately message a moderator instead of publicly instigating it yourself. They are perfectly capable of doing their jobs. You should be the bigger person and let it fly to ensure the conversation stays on topic. Lets not keep derailing meaningful discussions with subjective feelings. The mods are here to regulate that, not you @GroundedWisdom .
Now back to 5-2, of course 5* are the future. There are still many useful 4* at r5. They aren't irrelevant yet. They won't be until t2a is more accessible. You can do 5-2 just fine with 4*.
Rank 5 4* sl against ws in realm about 220 to 240 hit combo
Rank 3 5* sl about 200 hit combo
Rank 4 5* sl about 140 hit combo
What's the Sig of each?
The rank 3 5* and rank 4 ate the same champ at same Sig at different times
Ok. Fair amount more Damage.
I commented that the CR was the same. I didn't say they were equal in every way. What I did say was that 4*'s aren't being phased out of the game.
I think the 3 words you are looking for are, "I was wrong". Come on, you can say it
Ok. Fair amount more Damage.
I commented that the CR was the same. I didn't say they were equal in every way. What I did say was that 4*'s aren't being phased out of the game.
4* are (very slowly) being phased out of the game. Those who don't own any rank 4 5* champs and play at high prestige in AQ, don't see it yet.
That's not my opinion, but a fact. Kabam is giving more 4* shards out in Master rewards and Arena rank rewards. They are giving out more 4* sig stones in Master rewards. That devalues 4* champs.
I understand people who haven't done all end game content are doing just fine with 4* champs and that's alright. This doesn't change the fact that 4*s are slowly being phased out of the game though. This fact makes 5.2 rewards not good enough.
Rank 5 4* sl against ws in realm about 220 to 240 hit combo
Rank 3 5* sl about 200 hit combo
Rank 4 5* sl about 140 hit combo
What's the Sig of each?
The rank 3 5* and rank 4 ate the same champ at same Sig at different times
Ok. Fair amount more Damage.
I commented that the CR was the same. I didn't say they were equal in every way. What I did say was that 4*'s aren't being phased out of the game.
I think the 3 words you are looking for are, "I was wrong". Come on, you can say it
You'll get a helpful answer from kabam support before WebWisdom- I mean GroundedSnatcher- no I mean Grounded wisdom admits fault
Webs the problem is you think you know EVERYTHING about the game and cannot take being wrong.
You are also too blinded by fandom that you are unable to critique anything about the game even if it was to be constructive criticism.
Anyone with a different opinion as yourself you get into an argument with, put your point forward then tell everyone else their opinion is wrong or you are being harassed and bullied.
We can all see it apart from you, surely you need to take notice.
Just because you have an opinion doesn't mean you are right, and I don't know why anyone thinks that. It's so annoying.
I have a question about Power Shield node.
If our basic attacks don't deal damage but still cause debuffs, and if our special attacks cause 400% more damage, then will the damage from debuffs from special attacks be increased? Like, Hyperion 1st special (incinerate), Deadpool 2nd special (bleed), etc.
Yeah they do in 5.3.1 I basically used a team of SW hyperion Widow rogue and hawkeye. Bleed from Hawkeye l1 is insane and hyperion incinerate just destroys opponents. The synergies in this team had more power gain to help get to specials quicker. Hope that helps.
Just wanted to confirm this.
Any damage-dealing secondary effect that is applied during the Special Attack animation will be 400% more powerful. Hyperion's incinerates, Black Panther's Bleeds, etc.
Comments
Either tone down the difficulty or up the rewards significantly.
Beautifully said.
Everyone's opinions are valid. That's what makes it a discussion. Have anything to say about the topic, or are you still interested in contributing to the problem? "Bud".
Get a thread that isn't a sticky. Please
Gonna reply anyway, because you might as well believe up is down and such if you will believe that a R4 5* is not significantly better than a r5 4*. Rank 3 for a 5* is equivalent to Rank 5 for a 4*, and Rank 4 for a 5* is well beyond that (imagine if you could take a 4* to rank 6). 4* will always be relevant in the game for arenas for everyone, but will fade away in all other modes for those at the top, once 5* acquisition rates increase, and that will eventually trickle down.
And the rewards for 5.2 are not very good in comparison to the difficulty. I will fully retract that statement when you clear Collector with your crew, and I will admit to just being personally deficient in skill.
Rank 3 5* sl about 200 hit combo
Rank 4 5* sl about 140 hit combo
What's the Sig of each?
Precisely. You can't explain why someone's starting yesterday has a valid opinion on 5.2 because they don't. Because you're wrong. And yet again you're either too stubborn to admit it, or too blind to see that you're actually wrong.
So when you run out of arguments and complaints about harassing, you say "Nope we're done"? May I remind you you said you won't post on this subject anymore 3 or 4 pages ago?
Nobody is saying you or any other person can't post. Why are you changing the narrative? You can post your opinion 100 times for all I care. And I have the right to say it's not valid. Are we really done now?
Wrong. People with no experience with an issue or knowledge of an issue/topic do NOT have a valid opinion on that issue/topic.
This is the epitome of the "everyone gets a trophy and everyone is a beautiful and unique snowflake" generation we're in.
The rank 3 5* and rank 4 ate the same champ at same Sig at different times
He said that thrice actually (or was it four times?)
The idea of a "Master" difficulty quickly dropped to being completed by players not as far in-game. Personally (and maybe selfishly), I like seeing some content that players need to progress to a certain point before they can beat it. If they can use above-average skill to close the gap, I'm all for that as well.
Ok. Fair amount more Damage.
I commented that the CR was the same. I didn't say they were equal in every way. What I did say was that 4*'s aren't being phased out of the game.
Would you say 3* have been phased out of the game? Like would you still use 3* in difficult content?
Challenger rating is not the same for 4* or 5*, if that's what you want to say. 5* has higher critical rate than a 4* when you fight a 5* with both, for example.
Classic web, giving his opinion on stuff he hasn't hsd the hands on experience with, then cries victim an abuse then when asked for facts just says an done. Classic websnatcher
You state everyone has an opinion but if it derriere from yours then there wrong, your just bad news for this forum an community, but that's just my opinion
There are several occasions where you've changed the flow of conversation to yourself. If you feel someone has "shamed" you (a bit of an exaggeration as they are just looking for a discussion with those who have similar experience) the rules state to privately message a moderator instead of publicly instigating it yourself. They are perfectly capable of doing their jobs. You should be the bigger person and let it fly to ensure the conversation stays on topic. Lets not keep derailing meaningful discussions with subjective feelings. The mods are here to regulate that, not you @GroundedWisdom .
I think the 3 words you are looking for are, "I was wrong". Come on, you can say it
4* are (very slowly) being phased out of the game. Those who don't own any rank 4 5* champs and play at high prestige in AQ, don't see it yet.
That's not my opinion, but a fact. Kabam is giving more 4* shards out in Master rewards and Arena rank rewards. They are giving out more 4* sig stones in Master rewards. That devalues 4* champs.
I understand people who haven't done all end game content are doing just fine with 4* champs and that's alright. This doesn't change the fact that 4*s are slowly being phased out of the game though. This fact makes 5.2 rewards not good enough.
You'll get a helpful answer from kabam support before WebWisdom- I mean GroundedSnatcher- no I mean Grounded wisdom admits fault
You are also too blinded by fandom that you are unable to critique anything about the game even if it was to be constructive criticism.
Anyone with a different opinion as yourself you get into an argument with, put your point forward then tell everyone else their opinion is wrong or you are being harassed and bullied.
We can all see it apart from you, surely you need to take notice.
Just because you have an opinion doesn't mean you are right, and I don't know why anyone thinks that. It's so annoying.
Just wanted to confirm this.
Any damage-dealing secondary effect that is applied during the Special Attack animation will be 400% more powerful. Hyperion's incinerates, Black Panther's Bleeds, etc.
Joe Fixit OP.