I've 100% act 7 so far I've dealt with these annoying paradox things, hated them, would like to see Kabam to go back to the drawing board, the idea of that sort of thing is right but that wasnt very fun or interesting imo
That all being said, GOOD! I dont care about compensation, i dont want it and i dont need it. I chose to the do the content, if i really didnt like it i could have not done it. But i did. I made that decision. If they've adjusted it now to make it easier, great for those players
I dont need compensation, i dont deserve it and neither do you.
This guy gets it.
If controlling your paradox charges were this problematic for you, then you weren't doing it right. You just can't go full ham on every path, node, and defender and expect to win. Have to play smart and use strategy.
I don't think Kabam needs to announce when they make content easier, just be grateful for when they do.
Should there be compensation because the content is now mildly easier? No. Should there be compensation because Kabam made a change to end game content without even as much as a whisper? Absolutely.
Should there be compensation because the content is now mildly easier? No. Should there be compensation because Kabam made a change to end game content without even as much as a whisper? Absolutely.
Should you just wait to see if it was an unintentional update that went live a month early before making demands? Absolutely.
Act 7 isn't endgame content. They technically don't even need to communicate anything really.
What compensation would you even think is appropriate if the change was intentional for this month and they just forgot to notate it in the release notes. What did you miss out on from not knowing 3 days before the update went live? Compensation is to replace items you missed/lost out on, not to make your feelings less hurt.
Should there be compensation because the content is now mildly easier? No. Should there be compensation because Kabam made a change to end game content without even as much as a whisper? Absolutely.
Should you just wait to see if it was an unintentional update that went live a month early before making demands? Absolutely.
Act 7 isn't endgame content. They technically don't even need to communicate anything really.
What compensation would you even think is appropriate if the change was intentional for this month and they just forgot to notate it in the release notes. What did you miss out on from not knowing 3 days before the update went live? Compensation is to replace items you missed/lost out on, not to make your feelings less hurt.
I disagree with the notion that it’s not endgame content. People misconstrue that endgame means it has to be the hardest content available and that’s simply not true, in MCOC or in other games and MMOs. More often than not the optional content is harder than the endgame of a story. Act 7 is currently the endgame as that is where the progression ends for a lot of things, including titles and higher resources.
Should there be compensation because the content is now mildly easier? No. Should there be compensation because Kabam made a change to end game content without even as much as a whisper? Absolutely.
Literally what is the difference to your gameplay if this change was announced at the start of March instead as it was intended? We have found out about it earlier than we otherwise would have done. There is no downside to this yet people expect compensation, it’s baffling
Content gets nerfed after some time to make it compatible with the game economy & progression It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
Atleast those who have completed the 7.3 100% they should be compensated. As some paradox paths are really difficult and took long to complete. We spent units and potion and boost to complete the paradox. we should be getting some compensation. And there is no discussion or any information given for the changes in any news or anywhere in forum.
Content gets nerfed after some time to make it compatible with the game economy & progression It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
It's been 5 months, nearly 6. But what are you being compensated for? Put it in quantitative terms. Energy refills? Pots? 6 star generic AG? What loss did you incur because it went from 9-12?
This is great. I just need to explore 7.3.6 to 100% 7.3. Some paradox was annoying during exploring 7.3 but I wouldn't care for compensation from this change. It's not like Kabam will compensate for every health potions/revives you used. The offset will be a few potions/revives.
If anyone used more resources on the paradox paths than they're comfortable with, then they clearly weren't skilled and/or prepared enough to deserve the ability to clear them.
I disliked those paths as much as any other player, but I get the purpose for which they were designed.
Content gets nerfed after some time to make it compatible with the game economy & progression It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
It's been 5 months, nearly 6. But what are you being compensated for? Put it in quantitative terms. Energy refills? Pots? 6 star generic AG? What loss did you incur because it went from 9-12?
7.3 was released 2021. October 13, Wednesday. It hasn't been 4 months yet (4 days to go). Not 5, definitely not 6.
Content gets nerfed after some time to make it compatible with the game economy & progression It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
It's been 5 months, nearly 6. But what are you being compensated for? Put it in quantitative terms. Energy refills? Pots? 6 star generic AG? What loss did you incur because it went from 9-12?
7.3 released on 13th Oct in game....today is 9th Feb It hasn't been even 4 months completely & u're saying 5-6....that itself lessens the credibility of anything u said Coming to what loss it caused.....those few extra potions & revives which would've been saved if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 I remember a few fights where I died just bcoz the charges went up to 9 bcoz AI behavior is not something the player can control completely I know u still won't get it bcoz u have a reputation to maintain on the forums....but it's a genuine take that exploring 7 3 would've cost less to some players if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 Now go ahead & do ur disagree spams
Content gets nerfed after some time to make it compatible with the game economy & progression It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
It's been 5 months, nearly 6. But what are you being compensated for? Put it in quantitative terms. Energy refills? Pots? 6 star generic AG? What loss did you incur because it went from 9-12?
7.3 released on 13th Oct in game....today is 9th Feb It hasn't been even 4 months completely & u're saying 5-6....that itself lessens the credibility of anything u said Coming to what loss it caused.....those few extra potions & revives which would've been saved if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 I remember a few fights where I died just bcoz the charges went up to 9 bcoz AI behavior is not something the player can control completely I know u still won't get it bcoz u have a reputation to maintain on the forums....but it's a genuine take that exploring 7 3 would've cost less to some players if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 Now go ahead & do ur disagree spams
October 13th to Feb 13th is 5 months. March is 6 months. October November December January February
This update wasn't even supposed to happen this month if the rumors are true and likely would have come with 7.4 in March which is 6 months.
So you not being able to count, lessens your credibility right?
I don't disagree spam. I don't even use the reaction buttons for any comments. If I disagree with someone, I'm going to respond. Unlike many others on this forum who think they hold some power by using that button.
Content gets nerfed after some time to make it compatible with the game economy & progression It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
It's been 5 months, nearly 6. But what are you being compensated for? Put it in quantitative terms. Energy refills? Pots? 6 star generic AG? What loss did you incur because it went from 9-12?
7.3 released on 13th Oct in game....today is 9th Feb It hasn't been even 4 months completely & u're saying 5-6....that itself lessens the credibility of anything u said Coming to what loss it caused.....those few extra potions & revives which would've been saved if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 I remember a few fights where I died just bcoz the charges went up to 9 bcoz AI behavior is not something the player can control completely I know u still won't get it bcoz u have a reputation to maintain on the forums....but it's a genuine take that exploring 7 3 would've cost less to some players if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 Now go ahead & do ur disagree spams
October 13th to Feb 13th is 5 months. March is 6 months. October November December January February
This update wasn't even supposed to happen this month if the rumors are true and likely would have come with 7.4 in March which is 6 months.
So you not being able to count, lessens your credibility right?
I don't disagree spam. I don't even use the reaction buttons for any comments. If I disagree with someone, I'm going to respond. Unlike many others on this forum who think they hold some power by using that button.
Content gets nerfed after some time to make it compatible with the game economy & progression It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
It's been 5 months, nearly 6. But what are you being compensated for? Put it in quantitative terms. Energy refills? Pots? 6 star generic AG? What loss did you incur because it went from 9-12?
7.3 released on 13th Oct in game....today is 9th Feb It hasn't been even 4 months completely & u're saying 5-6....that itself lessens the credibility of anything u said Coming to what loss it caused.....those few extra potions & revives which would've been saved if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 I remember a few fights where I died just bcoz the charges went up to 9 bcoz AI behavior is not something the player can control completely I know u still won't get it bcoz u have a reputation to maintain on the forums....but it's a genuine take that exploring 7 3 would've cost less to some players if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 Now go ahead & do ur disagree spams
October 13th to Feb 13th is 5 months. March is 6 months. October November December January February
This update wasn't even supposed to happen this month if the rumors are true and likely would have come with 7.4 in March which is 6 months.
So you not being able to count, lessens your credibility right?
I don't disagree spam. I don't even use the reaction buttons for any comments. If I disagree with someone, I'm going to respond. Unlike many others on this forum who think they hold some power by using that button.
Are u sure u know how to count ?? Ok let me make it easier & simple enough fr u Oct 13 - Nov 12 : 1m Nov 13 - Dec 12 : 2m Dec 13 - Jan 12 : 3m Jan 13 - Feb 12 : 4m
U added 12 days more of Oct, & 15 more of Feb....giving u that extra 5th month U should've rechecked yr calculations before posting it online only to lessen ur credibility even more than u already had
Further, irrespective of when the change ws "supposed" to come, it's live in game now so it's still effectively less than 4 months of the node getting nerfed And u're trying to extend that 4 to 5 & 6 (even though u're repeatedly failing at that) like that would make any difference in terms of significance of game progression
Content gets nerfed after some time to make it compatible with the game economy & progression It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
It's been 5 months, nearly 6. But what are you being compensated for? Put it in quantitative terms. Energy refills? Pots? 6 star generic AG? What loss did you incur because it went from 9-12?
7.3 released on 13th Oct in game....today is 9th Feb It hasn't been even 4 months completely & u're saying 5-6....that itself lessens the credibility of anything u said Coming to what loss it caused.....those few extra potions & revives which would've been saved if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 I remember a few fights where I died just bcoz the charges went up to 9 bcoz AI behavior is not something the player can control completely I know u still won't get it bcoz u have a reputation to maintain on the forums....but it's a genuine take that exploring 7 3 would've cost less to some players if the limit had been 12 instead of 9 Now go ahead & do ur disagree spams
October 13th to Feb 13th is 5 months. March is 6 months. October November December January February
This update wasn't even supposed to happen this month if the rumors are true and likely would have come with 7.4 in March which is 6 months.
So you not being able to count, lessens your credibility right?
I don't disagree spam. I don't even use the reaction buttons for any comments. If I disagree with someone, I'm going to respond. Unlike many others on this forum who think they hold some power by using that button.
Are u sure u know how to count ?? Ok let me make it easier & simple enough fr u Oct 13 - Nov 12 : 1m Nov 13 - Dec 12 : 2m Dec 13 - Jan 12 : 3m Jan 13 - Feb 12 : 4m
U added 12 days more of Oct, & 15 more of Feb....giving u that extra 5th month U should've rechecked yr calculations before posting it online only to lessen ur credibility even more than u already had
Further, irrespective of when the change ws "supposed" to come, it's live in game now so it's still effectively less than 4 months of the node getting nerfed And u're trying to extend that 4 to 5 & 6 (even though u're repeatedly failing at that) like that would make any difference in terms of significance of game progression
I'm not worried about my credibility. As in the past, if I'm wrong I'll admit it. So yeah, 4 months. I'll agree with that.
Still don't see a need for compensation. You and others cry all the time about how Kabam doesn't care about players and when a beneficial big appears all you can do is ask about compensation. It's not that big of a change and it's not game altering.
It would have saved a decent amount of revives, energy, and health pots I used on certain Paradox paths because of how crappy it was to manage the charges in spite of the champ abilities, and other nodes.
So as already discussed here, this is an intended change, but not one that was meant to go out yet. There was to be communications ahead of its release, but we don't intend to turn it back now that it's already out.
When we Beta tested Act 7 Chapter 4, we got a lot of feedback on the Paradox Charges in Act 7 Chapter 3, so we decided to go back and make a tuning update. This is usually the kind of stuff we like to cover in Beta Tests for the content itself, but unfortunately, the Act 7 Chapter 3 Beta did not give us very much feedback at all, so the adjustment afterwards was necessary.
The changes made are: - Increased Max Paradox Charges from 9 to 12 - Decreased Resistance Reduction for 5% to 3.5%
The new description reads: "If the Attacker ever has 12 or more Paradox Charges at one time, all Paradox Charges are removed and the Attacker suffers a burst of damage equal to 200% of their modified Attack. Each Paradox Charge on the Attacker reduces their Resistances by 3.5%."
We had not had time to discuss if there will be any compensation or what it would look like yet, but will let you all know if we do decide to move ahead with something.
So as already discussed here, this is an intended change, but not one that was meant to go out yet. There was to be communications ahead of its release, but we don't intend to turn it back now that it's already out.
When we Beta tested Act 7 Chapter 4, we got a lot of feedback on the Paradox Charges in Act 7 Chapter 3, so we decided to go back and make a tuning update. This is usually the kind of stuff we like to cover in Beta Tests for the content itself, but unfortunately, the Act 7 Chapter 3 Beta did not give us very much feedback at all, so the adjustment afterwards was necessary.
The changes made are: - Increased Max Paradox Charges from 9 to 12 - Decreased Resistance Reduction for 5% to 3.5%
The new description reads: "If the Attacker ever has 12 or more Paradox Charges at one time, all Paradox Charges are removed and the Attacker suffers a burst of damage equal to 200% of their modified Attack. Each Paradox Charge on the Attacker reduces their Resistances by 3.5%."
We had not had time to discuss if there will be any compensation or what it would look like yet, but will let you all know if we do decide to move ahead with something.
That’s great and all but will Kabam pleeeeease do something so we can see how many paradox charges we have from fight to fight??? I’m pretty sure this feedback was given when paradox charges came out. As is, it seems rather silly that this isn’t shown.
So as already discussed here, this is an intended change, but not one that was meant to go out yet. There was to be communications ahead of its release, but we don't intend to turn it back now that it's already out.
When we Beta tested Act 7 Chapter 4, we got a lot of feedback on the Paradox Charges in Act 7 Chapter 3, so we decided to go back and make a tuning update. This is usually the kind of stuff we like to cover in Beta Tests for the content itself, but unfortunately, the Act 7 Chapter 3 Beta did not give us very much feedback at all, so the adjustment afterwards was necessary.
The changes made are: - Increased Max Paradox Charges from 9 to 12 - Decreased Resistance Reduction for 5% to 3.5%
The new description reads: "If the Attacker ever has 12 or more Paradox Charges at one time, all Paradox Charges are removed and the Attacker suffers a burst of damage equal to 200% of their modified Attack. Each Paradox Charge on the Attacker reduces their Resistances by 3.5%."
We had not had time to discuss if there will be any compensation or what it would look like yet, but will let you all know if we do decide to move ahead with something.
Thank you for this. Id say we dont need compensation for something so player friendly.
Comments
If controlling your paradox charges were this problematic for you, then you weren't doing it right. You just can't go full ham on every path, node, and defender and expect to win. Have to play smart and use strategy.
I don't think Kabam needs to announce when they make content easier, just be grateful for when they do.
Should there be compensation because Kabam made a change to end game content without even as much as a whisper? Absolutely.
Act 7 isn't endgame content. They technically don't even need to communicate anything really.
What compensation would you even think is appropriate if the change was intentional for this month and they just forgot to notate it in the release notes. What did you miss out on from not knowing 3 days before the update went live? Compensation is to replace items you missed/lost out on, not to make your feelings less hurt.
It happened with Act 6 (though it had a different primary reason & people were compensated fr that) & Acts 1-4 as well
BUT.....nerfing difficulty just a few months after release of a content is not usual & doesn't follow the trend of making it compatible with game progress
It's been roughly 3-4 months since 7.3 released & merely 1-2 months since most people explored it
Bcoz of that reason alone I think people deserve compensation in this case
If it would've been 1.5-2 yrs then it would be a different story, but considering the time passed since release, players deserve compensation IMO even if something minor like the monthly packages we are getting fr performance issues
It should be equal for all.
If they want to give out compensation I'll take it, but I honestly don't care if they don't.
I disliked those paths as much as any other player, but I get the purpose for which they were designed.
🙂
It hasn't been even 4 months completely & u're saying 5-6....that itself lessens the credibility of anything u said
Coming to what loss it caused.....those few extra potions & revives which would've been saved if the limit had been 12 instead of 9
I remember a few fights where I died just bcoz the charges went up to 9 bcoz AI behavior is not something the player can control completely
I know u still won't get it bcoz u have a reputation to maintain on the forums....but it's a genuine take that exploring 7 3 would've cost less to some players if the limit had been 12 instead of 9
Now go ahead & do ur disagree spams
October
November
December
January
February
This update wasn't even supposed to happen this month if the rumors are true and likely would have come with 7.4 in March which is 6 months.
So you not being able to count, lessens your credibility right?
I don't disagree spam. I don't even use the reaction buttons for any comments. If I disagree with someone, I'm going to respond. Unlike many others on this forum who think they hold some power by using that button.
October 13th to November 13th is one month.
Nov 13 to Dec 13 is two.
Dec 13 to Jan 13 is three.
Jan 13th to Feb 13 is 4.
Ok let me make it easier & simple enough fr u
Oct 13 - Nov 12 : 1m
Nov 13 - Dec 12 : 2m
Dec 13 - Jan 12 : 3m
Jan 13 - Feb 12 : 4m
U added 12 days more of Oct, & 15 more of Feb....giving u that extra 5th month
U should've rechecked yr calculations before posting it online only to lessen ur credibility even more than u already had
Further, irrespective of when the change ws "supposed" to come, it's live in game now so it's still effectively less than 4 months of the node getting nerfed
And u're trying to extend that 4 to 5 & 6 (even though u're repeatedly failing at that) like that would make any difference in terms of significance of game progression
Still don't see a need for compensation. You and others cry all the time about how Kabam doesn't care about players and when a beneficial big appears all you can do is ask about compensation. It's not that big of a change and it's not game altering.
The keyword here being 'intended.'
Fairness, compensation are an entirely separate topic that do not need to be addressed at this time.
So as already discussed here, this is an intended change, but not one that was meant to go out yet. There was to be communications ahead of its release, but we don't intend to turn it back now that it's already out.
When we Beta tested Act 7 Chapter 4, we got a lot of feedback on the Paradox Charges in Act 7 Chapter 3, so we decided to go back and make a tuning update. This is usually the kind of stuff we like to cover in Beta Tests for the content itself, but unfortunately, the Act 7 Chapter 3 Beta did not give us very much feedback at all, so the adjustment afterwards was necessary.
The changes made are:
- Increased Max Paradox Charges from 9 to 12
- Decreased Resistance Reduction for 5% to 3.5%
The new description reads: "If the Attacker ever has 12 or more Paradox Charges at one time, all Paradox Charges are removed and the Attacker suffers a burst of damage equal to 200% of their modified Attack. Each Paradox Charge on the Attacker reduces their Resistances by 3.5%."
We had not had time to discuss if there will be any compensation or what it would look like yet, but will let you all know if we do decide to move ahead with something.
Really enjoyed that 7.3
Was a really good Challenge, and i am happy yo see that nerf to give players a breath to make 7.4.