Best Of

Rip anyone that R4ed their Enchantress, shes basically the next Bullseye now with the constant counters (except she didnt need a counter whereas Bullseye did)

Yup, bullseye sucks now that there's a few good counters for him.
Serpent too. 😭
May as well throw sentinel in there, definitely enchantress now that Swoman is out, hell, just sell all the defenders with counters! 😂😂😂

You do realize how the game is produced, right? All Champs have counters eventually.

You do realize I'm completely clowning the guy I quoted, right?

Yet you put sentinel on the same level as bullseye and serpent lol.

It was a good defenders name. Im not the one who came out saying "omg I bet people gonna be pissed their r4 enchantress will have another hard
counter now" like Swoman isn't out already...
Welcome to the game, and how it has ALWAYS worked.
I wish I could say you were just new and didn't know better, but here we are.....

Again, the difference here lies in the fact that you don't need a counter for enchantress, but you do need one for bullseye , for serpent , for Yelena and soon to be high evolutionary etc. People have spots in their deck just for them whereas you can take enchantress with any science champ, and most high damage output nukes.

My point is the constant new releases/buffs of science champs are aimed at her, and not only counter her kit, but trivialize it entirely to the extent that Hulkling and Galan did to Peni. Meanwhile, with serpent or bullseye, you can still lose the match with a counter.

Im willing to bet Modok will also be able to counter her kit in 1 or more ways

So you don't need a specific counter for enchantress, but now that she's gonna have another "hard counter" people are gonna be pissed that they took her to r4?
My dude, you make no sense.

People took her to r4 KNOWING near any champ can take her with good play, but now they'll be pissed because of another hard counter for her.

Make it make sense.....

Last month, people barely gave a flying fig about the store. This month, people are outraged. Makes no sense.

It makes perfect sense actually.

Let's say there's a store which only allows you to use store credit. Now, you don't shop there all the time but it does have some value. Even if you feel like the overall value or majority of the items in the store aren't something you're after doesn't actually matter because you still acknowledge that the value is there and you do like one or two of the items. Since you get store credit anyway, you may as well use it right?

Now, let's say that said store increases the cost of that one or two items you did like and frequently spend the store credit on. Now, let's also say that the store changes it's policy and you notice that you're getting less store credit than you previously did.

Technically, you're being hit by shrinkflation AND inflation.

Even if you didn't think too much about the store before this point, you can still be outraged.

~*~

Now, please note that I'm not outraged, I haven't really studied the store and don't know if we're getting less Mysterium than we previously were or if the deals in the store are more costly, less costly or the exact same. I'm merely explaining the situation as it clearly does make logical sense if what people are claiming is actually true.