Why Iceman isn’t coldsnap immune Etc

124»

Comments

  • StellarStellar Member Posts: 1,086 ★★★★

    Even our universe's physics disagree with what you just said.

    Seriously ? you can damage something made of fire by burning it ?
    Guys try to sell your invention to the army or the fire department ! you'll become rich :D
  • SpideyFunkoSpideyFunko Member Posts: 21,943 ★★★★★
    edited June 2020
    Stellar said:

    Even our universe's physics disagree with what you just said.
    Seriously ? you can damage something made of fire by burning it ?
    Guys try to sell your invention to the army or the fire department ! you'll become rich :D

    it’s hellfire, not earth fire.

    there’s a difference
  • FolksFolks Member Posts: 2
    It’s juste because they’re outdated champ. Iceberg was the first and only one that did cold snap. And when GR and Dorma was realeased there was no (or really not a lot) champions that can put incinerate debuff. Just an outdated problème dudes
  • FolksFolks Member Posts: 2
    That is a shame too see how some people get contradiction spirit x). Everybody is pissed when He’s seein his GR incinerated. Don’t lie to yourself xD
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,658 Guardian
    Stellar said:

    DNA3000 said:

    Stellar said:

    Old subject....

    if it re-appears again and again , maybe kabam should take it, explain the why of their decision. If it happen their decision is justified, close the subject (and all incoming ones), if it happens they made a mistake on some champions immunity, decide how they will rectify their error !

    As for me, it's hard to accept the fact that a man "made of ice" could take damage from cold.... at the minimum ice man should be immune to cold snap and frostbite. at the maximum, cold snap and frost bite should allow him to instantly reform his armor ;)

    As for Ghost Rider and Dormammu, well they are essentially using mystic fire (hellfire as some pointed out) so having them not immune to "normal fire" is acceptable.

    Applying physics law to some fictional comic universe is somewhat strange... but just some common sense should be enough .

    If we shouldn't apply physics laws to fictional comic universes, on what basis are you saying Iceman should be immune to frost bite and cold snap? On what basis are you saying that the way frost bite and cold snap damages things is only by making them cold? Aren't these physics extrapolations? Shouldn't we just say cold snap is a comic book effect, and we shouldn't try to understand how comic book effects work, so when the game says cold snap deals energy damage, that's it?
    on what basis ? common sense ;)
    No need to applys physics law to acknowledge the fact that something made of ice should take no damage from ice or cold.
    Like something made of fire will take no damage from fire or heat
    It is as simple as that.
    Common sense being short hand for I'm always right and the game is always wrong, unless real physics disagrees in which case I'm right and the real world is wrong.
  • MathgeekMathgeek Member Posts: 609 ★★★

    Mathgeek said:

    Giodood_1 said:

    class dismissed

    Recess!
    i mess recess
    Me too :(
  • J0eySn0wJ0eySn0w Member Posts: 979 ★★★★

    Ghost Rider isn’t incinerate immune because he’s not on actual fire. As stated above, it’s Hellfire, which isn’t actual fire.

    There’s a difference.

    But it's still fire, and and he's able to set his enemies on fire burning them. The "its not an actual fire" isn't a sound argument.
    If Ghost Rider were to be released 2020 or even last year, I think he would have been incinerate immune. That will make the most sense considering where his power originates from.
Sign In or Register to comment.