Summoners, due to a technical issue, this week's series of Alliance Quests will be cancelled at 4pm PT. There will not be any Rewards for this series. The next series of Alliance Quests will start on April 18 at 12pm PT. We will be assessing the impact on Alliances and compensating accordingly, as well as returning Alliance Tickets.
Comments
That's the big question for many people- will it be easier than Act 6? Most of us don't work for Kabam so we don't have that information. As for the rest, I would like to see a couple of things very minor tweaked, but overall I think it can be ok, especially if the difficulty is like the side quests we've seen.
Rewards just need to be buffed by 50% (minimum acceptable) to 100% (where the game actually should be atm imo). As is, it’s just out of touch, which is okay-they’ve shown they can adjust when we speak up.
I mean, at this point Kabam probably figures we’ll complain no matter what they do (which I can’t blame them), so they start low and have room to increase to what they actually want it to be.
If that’s not the case... they promised to be better moving forward when the roadmap had to be made. Let’s make it more than a couple months before that promise is broken, please, Kabam.
And putting the rarest item in contest behind 4*s which no one wants to invest there resources in.
Its just terrible when we are forced to rank champs because of a temporary content.
Variant etc i understand its permanent we can rank up whenever we want and complete that content
But
When it comes to temporary events. Its just bad. Now everyone will be forced to rank up 4* variations of champs that are good counter to cavalier bosses.
Just add that 10% t5cc to exploration rewards too. Or come up with Any other challenge that doesn't force us to rank up 4* champs( useless nowdays)
Thank you
In other words, a position that can't defend itself on the forums is unlikely to be considered interesting by the devs. Nor should they be. Anyone who believes their position is something the devs should read should welcome opposition posts. Because good ideas only look good when they overcome opposing viewpoints successfully. If no one questions or challenges them at all, that's generally a mark of a boring idea.
I should also point out that when opposing viewpoints are presented on the forums, the one the devs think is better isn't always the one that the majority of forum posters support. Just like each and every one of us, the devs judge winners and losers in the marketplace of ideas on their own, and likes and disagrees have nothing to do with it. So if you genuinely believe someone is attacking your ideas unfairly, and you believe a neutral observer would agree, then those attacks should be irrelevant to you, as the devs will similarly ignore them. I know for a fact that the devs make the same judgments we do on that score also.
The problems the devs face is which player do they want to convince they are doing their job correctly.
It all boils down to what you can cumulatively get through the month though. Top AQ/AW players are already getting around 3/4 of a t5c per month. This takes that to around a full one. Players lower in rankings of those modes will be getting substantially less but that's how it's always been. They're not about to just start handing t5c out like candy especially when the vast majority of players have barely scratched let alone finished Act 6 and/or Abyss.
Like You did for first uncollected event
Theyve shown with V4 that they're adding more and more content which relies on a diverse roster, that includes rarities sadly. Saying 3*/4* in UC as a cavalier only option would be better, as 3*s are considerably cheaper to rank up.
Its only this month, next month it would be complete with mystics only, or certain tags. Complete a path itemless or without dying.. theres loads they could do in time. At least they're trying to add challenge, reward that challenge and think outside of the box whilst doing it, instead of just going shove 10k attack and 400k health on it
I’m fine with opposing viewpoints. Simply complaining about others who took the time to post their viewpoints is just trolling. If you can’t see the difference, you really shouldn’t be grandstanding about what should and should not be happening on the forums.
My opinion is the rewards aren’t good enough. I didn’t search out posts that liked the rewards and attempt to derail the thread or complain about their opinion or try to get personal. That’s not what the forums are for, I’m sorry you disagree and feel that behaviour should be allowed. If he had said “I disagree with you because _______....it’s then a discussion on a forum.
PS - you are never in a position to determine what is or is not irrelevant to someone else.
Can only hope following months are still challenging and more open at the same time. Mainly because I want those who will struggle in my alliance to pick up the items so we can keep progressing together
That isn’t the case. I’m constantly lacking t2a and try to grab every fragment i can.
1. Everyone seems to be blinded by the fact they are putting 10% T5C in, if this was put in as 4'500 Frags I think everyones take on this would be different!
When Uncollected was released we had the chance to pick up 9'000 T5B and thats just basic's doesn't have the RNG element between 6 classes.
2. Ok I hear everyone saying its not 10% its 20% with the Objectives, so great I have to rank up a bunch of 4 stars (last one I ranked 5 was Thing when he was released in January 2019 and I only did that for fun) my biggest need is T4B it will mean using 8 of them to rank/level up 1 4 star for possibly a one off objection.
I really think that stinks a little, Act 6 is released in March 2019 you can't take them in, no one that is at that level is going to rank up 4 star that was 18 months ago!