You're essentially asking for a toned-down Abyss or EOP with the same amount of rewards that those who did them on day 1 got. If you want to win more get a stronger roster (or actually get a worse roster because Kabam broke BGs so badly).
I dont understand why you are this mad, this is player versus player mode, where you should win if you are better than your opponent, if not, then you have to look at this mode like another PVE mode with strange CPU names.
Lower accounts getting X rewards doesnt make you lose those rewards, so stop complaining about it.
VT should be balanced matches.
GC should be the royal rumble where you have to have both better roster and skills to win, because if you win rewards, he loses rewards.
You are mad because the student that didnt study as hard as you gets the same degree, that doesnt affect you fam, stop being this annoying about it.
You are better so you will have a better job.
Same here, if you are better you will get higher in GC, and you will be able to do content easier, faster and with less amount of resources wasted.
The problem here is that the matchmaking is bad, so you get vs players with better rosters than you, instead of similar ones, when Kabam fixes the matchmaking problem everybody will get what he deserves from VT, and they will compete in GC so see who is the biggest whale on the tank.
Because much worse players than me and others at my level are breezing through the VT.
Do you really not understand that when two 16k+ players fight each other, one HAS to lose? It's not that hard to comprehend.
Apparently they're not so much worse because they're winning their Matches.
Seriously you have a comprehensive issue.
You sure you didn’t skip school when you were 10?
Not really. If people are better, they'd be winning their own Matches.
LoL Better how? Better persons? Better christians? Better musicians? It's amazing how they keep pro kbm trolls on forums
Did you know they are 1 million champ rating Paragon up to 5-6 millions? The gap is too big. (Opps you’re a TB so i bet you didn’t know).
The gap between uc & cav is not that much. They have almost the same champ rating and prestige.
But you’re gonna still missing this important point, cause @GroundedWisdom, maybe you’re dyslexic.
P/S: i’ve seen a lot of lower progression player screaming and ranting about matchmaking. When people asked what is their opinions on how to improve, they can’t answer.
First of all, your Account is a few days old on here, so I suspect you're not new. Given your tone, I'd say that's likely the case. Secondly, those Accounts that are Paragon at such a low Rating have likely pushed through for the sake of the Titles, Ranked very selectively, and are not well-rounded enough to compete with others within their own range. I've already talked about this. A few OP R4s are not enough of a Roster to respond to the different Nodes and variables that take place in BGs. Just because they're Paragon doesn't mean they're automatically supposed to do better. Thirdly, I'm not continuing a conversation with you unless you choose to be less disrespectful. I'm sure those who are dyslexic don't appreciate your comments.
Did you know they are 1 million champ rating Paragon up to 5-6 millions? The gap is too big. (Opps you’re a TB so i bet you didn’t know).
The gap between uc & cav is not that much. They have almost the same champ rating and prestige.
But you’re gonna still missing this important point, cause @GroundedWisdom, maybe you’re dyslexic.
P/S: i’ve seen a lot of lower progression player screaming and ranting about matchmaking. When people asked what is their opinions on how to improve, they can’t answer.
First of all, your Account is a few days old on here, so I suspect you're not new. Given your tone, I'd say that's likely the case. Secondly, those Accounts that are Paragon at such a low Rating have likely pushed through for the sake of the Titles, Ranked very selectively, and are not well-rounded enough to compete with others within their own range. I've already talked about this. A few OP R4s are not enough of a Roster to respond to the different Nodes and variables that take place in BGs. Just because they're Paragon doesn't mean they're automatically supposed to do better. Thirdly, I'm not continuing a conversation with you unless you choose to be less disrespectful. I'm sure those who are dyslexic don't appreciate your comments.
Paragon supposed to do better than uc and cav. What logic are you implying?
They pushing through the titles to get better rewards, yet they were punished in BG, far worst than uc & cav. Is it fair?
See, further proves that you’re dyslexic.
It’s not a disrespect. It’s a medical condition. Even a dyslexic patient admitted that they can’t understand things better than normal human beings. They don’t feel offended cause they know they are sick.
Unlike a dyslexic patient that is in denial, like you.
While I don't agree with GroundedWisdom's take on bgs and how it works, there is no reason to be aggressive towards him and calling him dyslexic is completely uncalled for.
Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean you the right to be rude to them because of their opinions.
Treat others with respect if you want to be treated with respect as well.
Did you know they are 1 million champ rating Paragon up to 5-6 millions? The gap is too big. (Opps you’re a TB so i bet you didn’t know).
The gap between uc & cav is not that much. They have almost the same champ rating and prestige.
But you’re gonna still missing this important point, cause @GroundedWisdom, maybe you’re dyslexic.
P/S: i’ve seen a lot of lower progression player screaming and ranting about matchmaking. When people asked what is their opinions on how to improve, they can’t answer.
First of all, your Account is a few days old on here, so I suspect you're not new. Given your tone, I'd say that's likely the case. Secondly, those Accounts that are Paragon at such a low Rating have likely pushed through for the sake of the Titles, Ranked very selectively, and are not well-rounded enough to compete with others within their own range. I've already talked about this. A few OP R4s are not enough of a Roster to respond to the different Nodes and variables that take place in BGs. Just because they're Paragon doesn't mean they're automatically supposed to do better. Thirdly, I'm not continuing a conversation with you unless you choose to be less disrespectful. I'm sure those who are dyslexic don't appreciate your comments.
Paragon supposed to do better than uc and cav. What logic are you implying?
They pushing through the titles to get better rewards, yet they were punished in BG, far worst than uc & cav. Is it fair?
See, further proves that you’re dyslexic.
It’s not a disrespect. It’s a medical condition. Even a dyslexic patient admitted that they can’t understand things better than normal human beings. They don’t feel offended cause they know they are sick.
Unlike a dyslexic patient that is in denial, like you.
bro chill with the personal attacks damn.
Btw "Even a dyslexic patient admitted that they can’t understand things better than normal human beings." is wrong, they have a problem with the technical side of reading not the understanding side. Also, and it's crazy how I feel I need to say this, dyslexic patients ARE normal human beings. Damn chill dude, you're about to sound like someone who started WWII.
Sorry, @Ironman3000 but you're making it too easy for yourself here. If a player with a bad rooster does a good job, makes a wise choice in choosing their champs, then has a good skill to use the champs and so on up the ladder, that's something to respect in the first place. On the other hand, if a TB or Paragon player with a very strong roster is still hanging around in Silver or Gold 3, it's obviously because he doesn't have the skill. And now he should be rewarded with weaker opponents, just because both are fighting for the same rewards? Sorry, seems illogical to me, because performance must be worthwhile and I only see performance in this context of the smaller account.
That being said, why should that be a contradiction? There are certainly several thousands of players in silver or gold. Why shouldn't it be possible to give a TB player in gold an adequate opponent of his strength, who is also in gold and at the same time to provide the smaller account with a suitable opponent who is more his collar size. There should only be unequal matches if there is so little choice of players that you have no choice. But I can't imagine that, I rather believe that the problem is the matchmaking and in this respect it is absolutely justified to point out the problem as long as it exists.
Did you know they are 1 million champ rating Paragon up to 5-6 millions? The gap is too big. (Opps you’re a TB so i bet you didn’t know).
The gap between uc & cav is not that much. They have almost the same champ rating and prestige.
But you’re gonna still missing this important point, cause @GroundedWisdom, maybe you’re dyslexic.
P/S: i’ve seen a lot of lower progression player screaming and ranting about matchmaking. When people asked what is their opinions on how to improve, they can’t answer.
First of all, your Account is a few days old on here, so I suspect you're not new. Given your tone, I'd say that's likely the case. Secondly, those Accounts that are Paragon at such a low Rating have likely pushed through for the sake of the Titles, Ranked very selectively, and are not well-rounded enough to compete with others within their own range. I've already talked about this. A few OP R4s are not enough of a Roster to respond to the different Nodes and variables that take place in BGs. Just because they're Paragon doesn't mean they're automatically supposed to do better. Thirdly, I'm not continuing a conversation with you unless you choose to be less disrespectful. I'm sure those who are dyslexic don't appreciate your comments.
Paragon supposed to do better than uc and cav. What logic are you implying?
They pushing through the titles to get better rewards, yet they were punished in BG, far worst than uc & cav. Is it fair?
See, further proves that you’re dyslexic.
It’s not a disrespect. It’s a medical condition. Even a dyslexic patient admitted that they can’t understand things better than normal human beings. They don’t feel offended cause they know they are sick.
Unlike a dyslexic patient that is in denial, like you.
Sorry, @Ironman3000 but you're making it too easy for yourself here. If a player with a bad rooster does a good job, makes a wise choice in choosing their champs, then has a good skill to use the champs and so on up the ladder, that's something to respect in the first place. On the other hand, if a TB or Paragon player with a very strong roster is still hanging around in Silver or Gold 3, it's obviously because he doesn't have the skill. And now he should be rewarded with weaker opponents, just because both are fighting for the same rewards? Sorry, seems illogical to me, because performance must be worthwhile and I only see performance in this context of the smaller account.
That being said, why should that be a contradiction? There are certainly several thousands of players in silver or gold. Why shouldn't it be possible to give a TB player in gold an adequate opponent of his strength, who is also in gold and at the same time to provide the smaller account with a suitable opponent who is more his collar size. There should only be unequal matches if there is so little choice of players that you have no choice. But I can't imagine that, I rather believe that the problem is the matchmaking and in this respect it is absolutely justified to point out the problem as long as it exists.
For sure everyone deserves equal matchups based on roster but at the same time the rewards should reflect that and lower strength rosters should get much lower rewards than higher strength roster. Thats the only way it can be fair for everyone.
Sorry, @Ironman3000 but you're making it too easy for yourself here. If a player with a bad rooster does a good job, makes a wise choice in choosing their champs, then has a good skill to use the champs and so on up the ladder, that's something to respect in the first place. On the other hand, if a TB or Paragon player with a very strong roster is still hanging around in Silver or Gold 3, it's obviously because he doesn't have the skill. And now he should be rewarded with weaker opponents, just because both are fighting for the same rewards? Sorry, seems illogical to me, because performance must be worthwhile and I only see performance in this context of the smaller account.
That being said, why should that be a contradiction? There are certainly several thousands of players in silver or gold. Why shouldn't it be possible to give a TB player in gold an adequate opponent of his strength, who is also in gold and at the same time to provide the smaller account with a suitable opponent who is more his collar size. There should only be unequal matches if there is so little choice of players that you have no choice. But I can't imagine that, I rather believe that the problem is the matchmaking and in this respect it is absolutely justified to point out the problem as long as it exists.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
In no way is a UC beating a UC nearly the same as a Paragon beating a Paragon. Low players being barred from playing the best players, and moving up the ladder because of that is just garbage. If the matchmaking was fair this wouldn't be an issue.
im 600k rating and 11k prestige and while i was in victory track i was facing mostly 800k-1.5m players so the climb was not hard at all for me to get to gc, but from time to time i would face the random 3-4m paragon player with a r5 6 star and thats just the game. once i reached GC i accpeted that a 600k rating roster will never get a win ,since GC is to show who the best of the best is, so now i just go for the 3 games every two days for objectives. during VT i would say that match making was pretty balanced other than the random game or two where you get matched against someone way out of your league. also let me add that i also faced some people with 300k rating or less using r3,4 4 stars during my climb in VT so you just gotta accept that the game is the game.
Perfect example of this garbage matchmaking gifting low rosters rewards that they don't deserve.
I disagree, he’s won his games and progressed through the victory track. He won them games.. He deserves to be in GC. Now that he’s in GC he struggles to win any games, so it’s unlikely he will move up past uru3 (at least not until the final week when more people are in) therefore he will only receive the standard 10k trophy tokens for getting to gc, nothing more. He is (I assume) cav, so the price of shards will be significantly higher than if he was tb/ paragon
You shouldn't get act 7 rewards for beating act 4.
They’re not getting those rewards.. UC can’t buy 6* shards only cav+ can… and even then, they’re pretty expensive for cavs to purchase at 1.2k tokens per 1k shards
Wrong.
Everyone gets the same rewards.
Uncollected literally can’t buy 6* shards.. they’re locked to them. how exactly are they getting the same rewards? (Specifically the act 7 rewards you claimed they’re getting)
Sorry, @Ironman3000 but you're making it too easy for yourself here. If a player with a bad rooster does a good job, makes a wise choice in choosing their champs, then has a good skill to use the champs and so on up the ladder, that's something to respect in the first place. On the other hand, if a TB or Paragon player with a very strong roster is still hanging around in Silver or Gold 3, it's obviously because he doesn't have the skill. And now he should be rewarded with weaker opponents, just because both are fighting for the same rewards? Sorry, seems illogical to me, because performance must be worthwhile and I only see performance in this context of the smaller account.
That being said, why should that be a contradiction? There are certainly several thousands of players in silver or gold. Why shouldn't it be possible to give a TB player in gold an adequate opponent of his strength, who is also in gold and at the same time to provide the smaller account with a suitable opponent who is more his collar size. There should only be unequal matches if there is so little choice of players that you have no choice. But I can't imagine that, I rather believe that the problem is the matchmaking and in this respect it is absolutely justified to point out the problem as long as it exists.
What is clearly going over your head, obviously because you are speaking on something you can't relate to, is that it's not as simple as having a great roster and win against other of similar rosters.
At lower levels like UC and Cav, a barely above average players or even a below average player who has good rng can easily streak together multiple wins to progress quick based on their competition.
At Paragon, above average isn't going to help you. Almost every fight, starting at bronze 3, you fight against the best players and strongest rosters in the entire game. Will a very good player get some wins, sure, but you know how hard it is to get multiple consecutive wins against the best players in the game stacked with every top champs and brand-new defender?
If you think it's a skill issue, I can prove you wrong. I'm still in gold right now, go to my channel and watch some of my videos. I've 100% all game content (minus last Carina challenges I'm taking time on while farming revives) and I have lots of guides showing my game play. Am I the best, nowhere close to it, but am I good enough to where I should be out of gold by now if there was a more fair process, absolutely.
In the meantime, 6-8k prestige accounts have gotten 3 times better rewards than me so far this BG season all because they are rewarded for not building their rosters while competing for same rewards as stronger rosters. You seriously think that's okay?
im 600k rating and 11k prestige and while i was in victory track i was facing mostly 800k-1.5m players so the climb was not hard at all for me to get to gc, but from time to time i would face the random 3-4m paragon player with a r5 6 star and thats just the game. once i reached GC i accpeted that a 600k rating roster will never get a win ,since GC is to show who the best of the best is, so now i just go for the 3 games every two days for objectives. during VT i would say that match making was pretty balanced other than the random game or two where you get matched against someone way out of your league. also let me add that i also faced some people with 300k rating or less using r3,4 4 stars during my climb in VT so you just gotta accept that the game is the game.
Perfect example of this garbage matchmaking gifting low rosters rewards that they don't deserve.
I disagree, he’s won his games and progressed through the victory track. He won them games.. He deserves to be in GC. Now that he’s in GC he struggles to win any games, so it’s unlikely he will move up past uru3 (at least not until the final week when more people are in) therefore he will only receive the standard 10k trophy tokens for getting to gc, nothing more. He is (I assume) cav, so the price of shards will be significantly higher than if he was tb/ paragon
You shouldn't get act 7 rewards for beating act 4.
They’re not getting those rewards.. UC can’t buy 6* shards only cav+ can… and even then, they’re pretty expensive for cavs to purchase at 1.2k tokens per 1k shards
Wrong.
Everyone gets the same rewards.
Uncollected literally can’t buy 6* shards.. they’re locked to them. how exactly are they getting the same rewards? (Specifically the act 7 rewards you claimed they’re getting)
The price the store charges has ZERO to do with the fact that everyone wins the same amount of rewards.
15 of the 32 best football teams in the world had losing records this season. I guess they should have just won more because they’re professional athletes and it’s so easy when you’re that good.
im 600k rating and 11k prestige and while i was in victory track i was facing mostly 800k-1.5m players so the climb was not hard at all for me to get to gc, but from time to time i would face the random 3-4m paragon player with a r5 6 star and thats just the game. once i reached GC i accpeted that a 600k rating roster will never get a win ,since GC is to show who the best of the best is, so now i just go for the 3 games every two days for objectives. during VT i would say that match making was pretty balanced other than the random game or two where you get matched against someone way out of your league. also let me add that i also faced some people with 300k rating or less using r3,4 4 stars during my climb in VT so you just gotta accept that the game is the game.
Perfect example of this garbage matchmaking gifting low rosters rewards that they don't deserve.
I disagree, he’s won his games and progressed through the victory track. He won them games.. He deserves to be in GC. Now that he’s in GC he struggles to win any games, so it’s unlikely he will move up past uru3 (at least not until the final week when more people are in) therefore he will only receive the standard 10k trophy tokens for getting to gc, nothing more. He is (I assume) cav, so the price of shards will be significantly higher than if he was tb/ paragon
You shouldn't get act 7 rewards for beating act 4.
They’re not getting those rewards.. UC can’t buy 6* shards only cav+ can… and even then, they’re pretty expensive for cavs to purchase at 1.2k tokens per 1k shards
Wrong.
Everyone gets the same rewards.
Uncollected literally can’t buy 6* shards.. they’re locked to them. how exactly are they getting the same rewards? (Specifically the act 7 rewards you claimed they’re getting)
The price the store charges has ZERO to do with the fact that everyone wins the same amount of rewards.
It does. Paragons and uncollected don't get the same things . The tokens are useless except for what you can buy with them. If there were no store even having 100k tokens is worth less than 1 gold
im 600k rating and 11k prestige and while i was in victory track i was facing mostly 800k-1.5m players so the climb was not hard at all for me to get to gc, but from time to time i would face the random 3-4m paragon player with a r5 6 star and thats just the game. once i reached GC i accpeted that a 600k rating roster will never get a win ,since GC is to show who the best of the best is, so now i just go for the 3 games every two days for objectives. during VT i would say that match making was pretty balanced other than the random game or two where you get matched against someone way out of your league. also let me add that i also faced some people with 300k rating or less using r3,4 4 stars during my climb in VT so you just gotta accept that the game is the game.
Perfect example of this garbage matchmaking gifting low rosters rewards that they don't deserve.
I disagree, he’s won his games and progressed through the victory track. He won them games.. He deserves to be in GC. Now that he’s in GC he struggles to win any games, so it’s unlikely he will move up past uru3 (at least not until the final week when more people are in) therefore he will only receive the standard 10k trophy tokens for getting to gc, nothing more. He is (I assume) cav, so the price of shards will be significantly higher than if he was tb/ paragon
You shouldn't get act 7 rewards for beating act 4.
They’re not getting those rewards.. UC can’t buy 6* shards only cav+ can… and even then, they’re pretty expensive for cavs to purchase at 1.2k tokens per 1k shards
Wrong.
Everyone gets the same rewards.
Uncollected literally can’t buy 6* shards.. they’re locked to them. how exactly are they getting the same rewards? (Specifically the act 7 rewards you claimed they’re getting)
The price the store charges has ZERO to do with the fact that everyone wins the same amount of rewards.
Actually it does have something to do with it. The currency changes value based on what's available. Otherwise you're talking about the ego trip of getting the same number, in which case that's ridiculous.
im 600k rating and 11k prestige and while i was in victory track i was facing mostly 800k-1.5m players so the climb was not hard at all for me to get to gc, but from time to time i would face the random 3-4m paragon player with a r5 6 star and thats just the game. once i reached GC i accpeted that a 600k rating roster will never get a win ,since GC is to show who the best of the best is, so now i just go for the 3 games every two days for objectives. during VT i would say that match making was pretty balanced other than the random game or two where you get matched against someone way out of your league. also let me add that i also faced some people with 300k rating or less using r3,4 4 stars during my climb in VT so you just gotta accept that the game is the game.
Perfect example of this garbage matchmaking gifting low rosters rewards that they don't deserve.
I disagree, he’s won his games and progressed through the victory track. He won them games.. He deserves to be in GC. Now that he’s in GC he struggles to win any games, so it’s unlikely he will move up past uru3 (at least not until the final week when more people are in) therefore he will only receive the standard 10k trophy tokens for getting to gc, nothing more. He is (I assume) cav, so the price of shards will be significantly higher than if he was tb/ paragon
You shouldn't get act 7 rewards for beating act 4.
They’re not getting those rewards.. UC can’t buy 6* shards only cav+ can… and even then, they’re pretty expensive for cavs to purchase at 1.2k tokens per 1k shards
Wrong.
Everyone gets the same rewards.
Uncollected literally can’t buy 6* shards.. they’re locked to them. how exactly are they getting the same rewards? (Specifically the act 7 rewards you claimed they’re getting)
The price the store charges has ZERO to do with the fact that everyone wins the same amount of rewards.
Once again nitpicking my argument… where are these act 7 rewards that they can get because they’ve beat act 4? Non existent. They can’t buy 6* shards AT ALL as UC. Also, everyone doesn’t earn the same amount of rewards(they earn the same amount of currency) That currency is able to buy you more/less rewards depending on your progression level. And once these lower accounts get to GC, they’re staying in the lowest tier.. Whereas you with a bigger roster are more likely to be able to progress further than uru3, provided you have some skill to back it up
Lol, yes I'm the one nitpicking. The rewards are literally the same for everyone. You all are bending over backward to try to spin it but the facts are the facts.
im 600k rating and 11k prestige and while i was in victory track i was facing mostly 800k-1.5m players so the climb was not hard at all for me to get to gc, but from time to time i would face the random 3-4m paragon player with a r5 6 star and thats just the game. once i reached GC i accpeted that a 600k rating roster will never get a win ,since GC is to show who the best of the best is, so now i just go for the 3 games every two days for objectives. during VT i would say that match making was pretty balanced other than the random game or two where you get matched against someone way out of your league. also let me add that i also faced some people with 300k rating or less using r3,4 4 stars during my climb in VT so you just gotta accept that the game is the game.
Perfect example of this garbage matchmaking gifting low rosters rewards that they don't deserve.
I disagree, he’s won his games and progressed through the victory track. He won them games.. He deserves to be in GC. Now that he’s in GC he struggles to win any games, so it’s unlikely he will move up past uru3 (at least not until the final week when more people are in) therefore he will only receive the standard 10k trophy tokens for getting to gc, nothing more. He is (I assume) cav, so the price of shards will be significantly higher than if he was tb/ paragon
You shouldn't get act 7 rewards for beating act 4.
They’re not getting those rewards.. UC can’t buy 6* shards only cav+ can… and even then, they’re pretty expensive for cavs to purchase at 1.2k tokens per 1k shards
Wrong.
Everyone gets the same rewards.
Uncollected literally can’t buy 6* shards.. they’re locked to them. how exactly are they getting the same rewards? (Specifically the act 7 rewards you claimed they’re getting)
The price the store charges has ZERO to do with the fact that everyone wins the same amount of rewards.
Once again nitpicking my argument… where are these act 7 rewards that they can get because they’ve beat act 4? Non existent. They can’t buy 6* shards AT ALL as UC. Also, everyone doesn’t earn the same amount of rewards(they earn the same amount of currency) That currency is able to buy you more/less rewards depending on your progression level. And once these lower accounts get to GC, they’re staying in the lowest tier.. Whereas you with a bigger roster are more likely to be able to progress further than uru3, provided you have some skill to back it up
UC shouldn't even be in this argument.. they should spend energy and units lvling up..
Comments
Better how? Better persons? Better christians? Better musicians?
It's amazing how they keep pro kbm trolls on forums
Secondly, those Accounts that are Paragon at such a low Rating have likely pushed through for the sake of the Titles, Ranked very selectively, and are not well-rounded enough to compete with others within their own range. I've already talked about this. A few OP R4s are not enough of a Roster to respond to the different Nodes and variables that take place in BGs. Just because they're Paragon doesn't mean they're automatically supposed to do better.
Thirdly, I'm not continuing a conversation with you unless you choose to be less disrespectful. I'm sure those who are dyslexic don't appreciate your comments.
Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean you the right to be rude to them because of their opinions.
Treat others with respect if you want to be treated with respect as well.
Btw "Even a dyslexic patient admitted that they can’t understand things better than normal human beings." is wrong, they have a problem with the technical side of reading not the understanding side. Also, and it's crazy how I feel I need to say this, dyslexic patients ARE normal human beings. Damn chill dude, you're about to sound like someone who started WWII.
That being said, why should that be a contradiction? There are certainly several thousands of players in silver or gold. Why shouldn't it be possible to give a TB player in gold an adequate opponent of his strength, who is also in gold and at the same time to provide the smaller account with a suitable opponent who is more his collar size. There should only be unequal matches if there is so little choice of players that you have no choice. But I can't imagine that, I rather believe that the problem is the matchmaking and in this respect it is absolutely justified to point out the problem as long as it exists.
I understand your scepticism, I would be too
I'm sorry I can't provide a screenshot so I understand not believing me
Forget that match or any other individual anomalies
I still think matchmaking should improve and the ai in bgs in much different from quests
Alot is wrong with BG but it is still enjoyable so I will accept the good with the bad
In no way is a UC beating a UC nearly the same as a Paragon beating a Paragon. Low players being barred from playing the best players, and moving up the ladder because of that is just garbage. If the matchmaking was fair this wouldn't be an issue.
At lower levels like UC and Cav, a barely above average players or even a below average player who has good rng can easily streak together multiple wins to progress quick based on their competition.
At Paragon, above average isn't going to help you. Almost every fight, starting at bronze 3, you fight against the best players and strongest rosters in the entire game. Will a very good player get some wins, sure, but you know how hard it is to get multiple consecutive wins against the best players in the game stacked with every top champs and brand-new defender?
If you think it's a skill issue, I can prove you wrong. I'm still in gold right now, go to my channel and watch some of my videos. I've 100% all game content (minus last Carina challenges I'm taking time on while farming revives) and I have lots of guides showing my game play. Am I the best, nowhere close to it, but am I good enough to where I should be out of gold by now if there was a more fair process, absolutely.
In the meantime, 6-8k prestige accounts have gotten 3 times better rewards than me so far this BG season all because they are rewarded for not building their rosters while competing for same rewards as stronger rosters. You seriously think that's okay?